Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 25(5): 1207-1210, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37084018

RESUMEN

Current guidelines recommend that physicians use a shared decision-making (SDM) approach to engage with patients on the potential benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening based on their individual risk. In a sample of 4,118 men aged 55-69 from the 2018 New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), we compared the frequency of screening recommendations and SDM conversations according to four race/ethnic groups. In logistic regression, we evaluated the likelihood of SDM conversations between race/ethnic groups. Our findings suggest that the odds of never having a SDM conversation with their healthcare provider were significantly higher among Hispanic men (OR 95% CI: 2.10, 1.11-3.99) and other/multiracial men (OR, 95% CI: 3.08, 1.46-6.52) compared to white men, while black men had comparable odds (1.52, 0.98-2.34). The lower frequency of SDM conversation among Hispanic and other/multiracial men suggest a missed opportunity for healthcare providers to guide informed screening decisions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , New York , Toma de Decisiones , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Prevalencia , Tamizaje Masivo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA