RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stroke after durable left ventricular assist device (d-LVAD) implantation portends high mortality. The incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and the impact on stroke outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) management among patients requiring bridge to d-LVAD with micro-axial flow-pump (mAFP, Abiomed) is unsettled. METHODS: Consecutive patients, who underwent d-LVAD implantation after being bridged with mAFP at 19 institutions, were retrospectively included. The incidence of early ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke after d-LVAD implantation (<60 days) and association of pre-d-LVAD characteristics and peri-procedural management with a specific focus on tMCS strategies were studied. RESULTS: Among 341 patients, who underwent d-LVAD implantation after mAFP implantation (male gender 83.6%, age 58 [48-65] years, mAFP 5.0/5.5 72.4%), the early ischemic stroke incidence was 10.8% and early hemorrhagic stroke 2.9%. The tMCS characteristics (type of mAFP device and access, support duration, upgrade from intra-aortic balloon pump, ECMELLA, ECMELLA at d-LVAD implantation, hemolysis, and bleeding) were not associated with ischemic stroke after d-LVAD implant. Conversely, the device model (mAFP 2.5/CP vs. mAFP 5.0/5.5: HR 5.6, 95%CI 1.4-22.7, p = 0.015), hemolysis on mAFP support (HR 10.5, 95% CI 1.3-85.3, p = 0.028) and ECMELLA at d-LVAD implantation (HR 5.0, 95% CI 1.4-18.7, p = 0.016) were associated with increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke after d-LVAD implantation. Both early ischemic (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.9-4.5, p < 0.001) and hemorrhagic (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.49-7.88, p = 0.004) stroke were associated with increased 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing d-LVAD implantation following mAFP support, tMCS characteristics do not impact ischemic stroke occurrence, while several factors are associated with hemorrhagic stroke suggesting a proactive treatment target to reduce this complication.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Cardiac support systems are being used increasingly more due to the growing prevalence of heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Reducing cardiac afterload, intracardiac pressure, and flow support are important factors. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intracardiac microaxial pump systems (Impella) as non-permanent MCS (mechanical circulatory support) are being used increasingly. METHODS: We reviewed the recent literature and developed an international European registry for non-permanent MCS. RESULTS: Life-threatening conditions that are observed preoperatively often include reduced left ventricular function, systemic hypoperfusion, myocardial infarction, acute and chronic heart failure, myocarditis, and valve vitia. Postoperative complications that are commonly observed include severe systemic inflammatory response, ischemia-reperfusion injury, trauma-related disorders, which ultimately may lead to low cardiac output (CO) syndrome and organ dysfunctions, which necessitates a prolonged ICU stay. Choosing the appropriate device for support is critical. The management strategies and complications differ by system. The "heart-team" approach is inevitably needed.However despite previous efforts to elucidate these topics, it remains largely unclear which patients benefit from certain systems, when is the right time to initiate (MCS), which support system is appropriate, what is the optimal level and type of support, which therapeutic additive and supportive strategies should be considered and ultimately, what are the future prospects and therapeutic developments. CONCLUSION: The European cardiac surgical register ImCarS has been established as an IIT with the overall aim to evaluate data received from the daily clinical practice in cardiac surgery. Interested colleagues are cordially invited to join the register. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024560. POSITIVE ETHICS VOTE: AZ 246/20 Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University-Gießen.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: A logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (logEuroSCORE) ≥20% is frequently recognised as a finite criteria for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) reimbursement, despite guideline modifications to reflect the appropriacy of TAVI in selected lower-risk patients. The aim was to evaluate the clinical value of this threshold cut-off in TAVI patients and to identify factors associated with mortality in those below this threshold. Methods: We analysed data from a single-centre, German, observational, TAVI-patient registry, gathered between 2008 and 2016. Patients were stratified by logEuroSCORE (≥ or <20%) for comparisons. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of mortality at 1 year, with this analysis used to generate a calculated ('real') risk value for each patient. Results: 1679 patients (logEuroSCORE <20%: n=789; logEuroSCORE ≥20%: n=890) were included. LogEuroSCORE <20% patients were significantly younger (80.1 vs 81.6 years; p<0.001) and less comorbid than logEuroSCORE ≥20% patients, with a higher rate of transfemoral TAVI (35.6% vs 26.1%; p<0.001) and predilation (70.0% vs 63.3%; p=0.004). Patients with a logEuroSCORE <20% experienced more vascular complications (3.4% vs 1.5%; p=0.010). One-year survival was 88.3% in the logEuroSCORE <20% and 81.8% in the logEuroSCORE ≥20% group (p=0.005), with the calculated mortality risk falling within 2% of the logEuroSCORE in just 12.9% of patients. In the logEuroSCORE <20% group, only coronary artery disease was significantly predictive of 1-year mortality (OR 2.408; 95% CI 1.361 to 4.262; p=0.003). Conclusions: At our institution, patients with a logEuroSCORE <20% selected for TAVI have excellent outcomes. The decision not to reimburse TAVI in such patients may be viewed as inappropriate.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Selección de Paciente , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/economía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: It may be expected that patients with left ventricular dysfunction may be at greater risk of complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via transapical (TA) access compared with via transfemoral (TF) access. There is a lack of data comparing the outcomes of TAVI using TA and TF access in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of data from a high-volume heart centre in Germany. TAVI access route assignment was based on a 'best for TF' approach, where only patients who met a strict set of criteria underwent TF-TAVI, with the remainder receiving TA-TAVI. For this analysis, patients were included if they had a pre-TAVI EF of ≤ 40%. Early mortality and late (1-year) mortality were compared through multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients in the registry had an EF of ≤ 40%, of which 74.9% underwent TA-TAVI and 25.1% underwent TF-TAVI. Higher proportions of the TA group presented with certain comorbidities, and their logistic EuroSCORE and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk scores were higher than in the TF group. At 1 year, TA access was associated with greater mortality in the univariate analysis (odd ratio 2.43; 95% confidence interval 1.04-5.69). However, after multivariate adjustment, no significant differences were found in either 30-day or 1-year mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that, for patients with a reduced EF, TA-TAVI is not associated with a poorer outcome compared with TF-TAVI. Therefore, TA access should not be discounted based on the presence of left ventricular dysfunction alone.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Sistema de Registros , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen SistólicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The "transfemoral (TF) first" approach to access route selection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is popular; however, the risk of major vascular complications is substantial. The "best for TF" approach identifies only the patients with ideal anatomy for TF-TAVI, potentially minimizing complications. AIM: To characterize the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI at a large-volume site that employs this approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent TAVI at the Bad Rothenfelde Heart Centre between 2008 and 2016 were consecutively enrolled. Findings were compared to those from large, multicenter registries. RESULTS: Of the 1,644 patients enrolled, 1,140 underwent TA- and 504 TF-TAVI. Comorbidities were more frequent in TA patients, who also had higher risk scores (EuroSCORE: 25.5% vs. 21.2%; STS score: 11.0% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001 for both). Rates of conversion to open surgery, major vascular complications and intra-procedural mortality did not differ between groups. At 30 days, mortality rates were higher in the TA group (3.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.036). Stroke/transient ischemic attack and permanent pacemaker implantation rates did not differ significantly between groups (2.0% and 9.1% overall, respectively). Compared to multicenter registries, trends in mortality and complication rates were similar, though magnitudes were lower in the present study. In contrast with the present study, major vascular complication rates in multicenter registries are significantly higher for TF compared to TA patients. CONCLUSIONS: At this high-volume center, the use of a "best for TF" approach to TAVI resulted in low mortality and complication rates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a recognized therapeutic option for high-risk and inoperable patients with aortic valve stenosis. The choice of access route is a matter of debate. We are presenting our 5-year experience of transapical TAVI dominance. PATIENTS: This single-center study includes 575 patients. Two groups were compared: transapical (TA) and transfemoral (TF) with 454 and 121 patients, respectively. Individual access route decision was made by our heart team following a clinical and computed tomography (CT) data based nonbiased strategy. The same team performed all procedures. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was significantly higher in the TA group, however, without difference in STS score. The number of patients with coronary artery disease, previous cardiac surgery, and low left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the TA group. There were no significant differences in age and presence of other comorbidities. RESULTS: Procedural success in both TA and TF groups was high (97.9% and 97.6%). No patient died during the procedure. Patient survival (30 days: TF, 97.5% vs. TA, 95.7%; 1 year: TF, 94.6% vs. TA, 81.8%; 2 years: TF, 84.7% vs. TA, 76.7%; 3 years: TF, 59.9% vs. TA, 67.8%) and a low TF vascular complication rate (1.6%) are encouraging compared with other registry data. CONCLUSION: A "no competition" team approach strategy along with an experienced hybrid team leads to fewer vascular complications and better outcomes for both TA and TF TAVI patients.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Ingle , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Radiografía , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/normas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) is the method of choice in patients with severe stenosis of the aortic valve, high operative risk, and an adverse peripheral vasculature. The procedure is generally guided by peripheral arterial access angiography. We report on a 71-year-old patient in whom, because of the absence of an alternative peripheral arterial access route, TA-TAVI was supported by the apical insertion of the angiography catheter. This approach was effective and safe, and proper valve deployment was feasible without unexpected procedural complications.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Anciano , Angiografía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Humanos , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Modulation of organic semiconductor band gap, electron affinities (EA), ionization potentials (IP), and reorganization energies (λ) associated with charge transfer is critical for its applications. We report here that trifluoromethylation not only increases both IP and EA significantly as expected but also narrows the HOMO-LUMO band gaps and increases considerably the air-stability of arene-based n-type organic semiconductors. The increased air-stability results from relatively high EA energies and a change in oxidation mechanism. Calculated EAs and IPs show that trifluoromethylated arenes are excellent candidates for n-type semiconductor materials; though a moderate increase of inner-sphere reorganization energy (λi) associated with charge transfer is the penalty for the improved performance of the trifluoromethylated compounds. However, since λi decreases as the π conjugation increases, a rational design to produce air-stable n-type semiconductor materials with reasonably small λi is simply to prepare trifluoromethylated arenes with extended π conjugation. Furthermore, we found that structural isomerization can fine-tune the optoelectronic and electronic transfer properties of the corresponding aromatics.
RESUMEN
Catheter-based transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) in patients with severe stenosis of the aortic valve and with a high operative risk is a new procedure which is becoming established in clinical practice. Aortic regurgitation is not yet a recognized indication for TA-AVI, and to date valve-in-valve (V-in-V) implantation in patients with incompetent stentless bioprostheses has not been attempted. The case is reported of a successful TA-AVI in a regurgitant, uncalcified stentless Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis. The position and hemodynamic function of the apically implanted valve were excellent, and the patient's current state of health is good.