Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Dig Liver Dis ; 47(7): 532-43, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25921277

RESUMEN

This Position Paper contains clinically oriented guidelines by the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP) for the diagnosis and treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. The statements were formulated by three working groups of experts who searched and analysed the most recent literature; a consensus process was then performed using a modified Delphi procedure. The statements provide recommendations on the most appropriate definition of the complications of severe acute pancreatitis, the diagnostic approach and the timing of conservative as well as interventional endoscopic, radiological and surgical treatments.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Terapia Combinada , Drenaje/métodos , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/complicaciones , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/terapia , Nutrición Parenteral/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
Pediatr Int ; 55(3): 382-5, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23782371

RESUMEN

Acquired causes of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) are rarely encountered in infancy, having an approximate incidence of 1 per 100,000 live births. Reports of short-term exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs having adverse events are few. We present the case of a previously healthy 3-year-old boy who developed severe chronic gastric outlet obstruction and antral stenosis after a short-term ingestion of liquid ibuprofen at a dosage not thought to be associated with unfavorable effects. Even though the optimal management of these cases remains to be determined, we report on a prompt and successful endoscopic treatment for this condition.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Dilatación/métodos , Obstrucción de la Salida Gástrica/inducido químicamente , Obstrucción de la Salida Gástrica/terapia , Gastritis/inducido químicamente , Gastritis/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Gastroscopía/métodos , Ibuprofeno/efectos adversos , Úlcera Gástrica/inducido químicamente , Úlcera Gástrica/terapia , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Hematemesis/etiología , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Antro Pilórico/patología , Recurrencia
3.
Dig Liver Dis ; 44(2): 128-33, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21924691

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Various types of self-expandable metal stents have been introduced for the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. AIMS: To compare the outcomes of WallFlex™ and Wallstent™ uncovered biliary self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for the palliation of patients with malignant biliary obstruction. METHODS: Between October 2008 and December 2009, all SEMSs placed for malignant biliary obstruction were WallFlex™: all patients palliated were included in the study. Before October 2008, all the SEMSs placed for malignant biliary obstruction were Wallstent™, and the patients palliated from July 2007 to September 2008 were the comparative group. RESULTS: A total of 58 WallFlex™ and 54 Wallstent™ SEMSs were placed, and efficacious biliary decompression was achieved in all patients. Early complications occurred in 5 patients in the WallFlex™ group and in 3 in the Wallstent™ group (p=ns). Late complications occurred in 6 patients in the WallFlex™ group and in 16 in the Wallstent™ group (p<0.01). The overall patency of the self-expandable metal stent in the WallFlex™ and the Wallstent™ groups was similar (227 days vs. 215 days, p=ns). Mean patient survival was 242 days in the WallFlex™ group and 257 days in the Wallstent™ group (p=ns). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in terms of overall patency between the two types of SEMSs, but there was an increased rate of late adverse events in the Wallstent™ group.


Asunto(s)
Aleaciones , Colestasis/cirugía , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Acero Inoxidable , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestasis/diagnóstico , Colestasis/etiología , Endosonografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 46(5): 591-6, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21271788

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of through-the-scope (TTS) large diameter self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2009, all patients who underwent endoscopic SEMS placement for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction were prospectively enrolled. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (17M and 22F; mean age 75.9 ± 10.6 years, range 50-91) were enrolled. The most frequent location was the sigmoid colon (13 cases). The causes of obstruction were colorectal malignancy in 32 patients and extracolonic malignancy in 7. Technical success was achieved in 36/39 patients (92.3%) and clinical success in 35/39 patients (89.7%). Technical failure was related to female sex (p = 0.04) and the extracolonic etiology of the stricture (p < 0.001). There were three early complications: two procedure-related perforations successfully managed conservatively and one hemorrhage treated with APC. Early complications were related to the location of strictures at the recto-sigmoid junction (p < 0.001). Late complications occurred in 10 patients: 8 of these patients experienced occlusive symptoms (attributable to tumor ingrowth in 5 cases and stool impaction in 3 cases); the remaining 2 were one case of tumor ingrowth with sub-occlusive symptoms and hemorrhage, and one case of distal migration. There was no procedure-related mortality and all complications were managed without surgical intervention. SEMS patency duration was 236 ± 128 days (range 31-497) and mean survival of the patients was 259 ± 121 days (range, 32-511). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, TTS large-diameter SEMS placement is a safe and effective treatment for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/terapia , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Obstrucción Intestinal/terapia , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Cuidados Paliativos , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades del Colon/etiología , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Digestion ; 82(4): 213-20, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20588036

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The study examines the outcomes of the 'inject and cut' endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2008 all patients referred to our institution for EMR of large polyps were prospectively evaluated. The accuracy of lifting sign and the rate of en bloc and piecemeal resection, complications and recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients with 182 lesions (median size 24.7 +/- 10.2 mm) were included in the study. The most frequent location was the sigmoid colon in 30.2%. Because of non-lifting sign, 5/182 lesions were referred to surgical resection and 177 (43 flat and 134 sessile) were resected, 79 (44.6%) en bloc and 98 (55.4%) piecemeal. There were 20 procedural (11.3%) and 2 late (1.1%) bleeding, 4 post-polypectomy syndrome (2.2%) and 2 perforations (1.1%). Bleeding was related to malignancy (p = 0.01). Intramucosal cancer was observed in 5 cases (2.8%) while invasive cancer was seen in 8 (4.5%). Malignancy was related to polyp size >or=30 mm (p = 0.002). Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 147 patients with 172 EMR for a mean of 19.8 months. Recurrence was observed in 12/172 (6.9%) polyps. CONCLUSION: Inject and cut EMR is practical and effective with a low risk of complication and local recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Electrocirugia , Femenino , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Dig Dis Sci ; 55(6): 1726-31, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19657735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The most common complication of polypectomy is hemorrhage, and various techniques have been used to prevent this complication. AIM: This study evaluates the outcomes of endoclip-assisted polypectomy in patients with large pedunculated colorectal polyps, in comparison with a historical control group of patients treated with endoloop-assisted polypectomy. METHODS: Between January and December 2007, 32 patients with 32 large pedunculated polyps (>or=15 mm) were treated with endoclip-assisted polypectomy (group A). Between January and December 2006, 35 patients with 35 large pedunculated polyps were treated; 33 with endoloop-assisted polypectomy (control, group B) and two cases with endoclips and needle knife, which were included in group A for the analysis. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) size of polyp head was 26.8 +/- 8.1 mm (range 15-50) in group A and 22.3 +/- 4.1 mm (range 15-30) in group B (P = 0.004). In group A, six polyps had a mean (+/-SD) head size of 40.8 +/- 5.8 mm (range 35-50) and were resected with clips and needle knife. In group A, bleeding occurred in two cases (5.9%), which were associated with the presence of cancer at histology (P = 0.006) and were managed by applying new clips. No bleeding occurred in patients of group B and no perforation and post-polypectomy syndrome occurred in either group. There were three (8.8%) cancerized adenomas in group A and one (3%) in group B. Clip application was possible in all patients, while in two cases, loop placement was impossible. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, endoclip-assisted resection is a safe alternative to endoloop for the resection of large pedunculated colorectal polyps when endoloop placement is difficult or impossible.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopios , Colonoscopía , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Pólipos/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos/patología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 24(6): 1107-12, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19638088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for common bile duct stones (CBDS) and may be used to select patients for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). The aim of this trial is to compare, in patients with non-high-risk for CDBS, the clinical and economic impact of EUS plus ERC performed in a single endoscopic session versus EUS plus ERC in two separate sessions. METHODS: During an 11-month period, all adult patients admitted to the emergency department with suspicion of CBDS were categorized into either high-risk or non-high-risk groups, on the basis of clinical, biochemical, or transabdominal ultrasound findings. Patients in the non-high-risk group were randomized to receive EUS plus ERC in one single or in two separate sessions. RESULTS: Eighty patients were recruited and randomized. Forty patients underwent EUS plus ERC in a single session and 40 patients underwent EUS plus ERC in two separate sessions. Negative EUS examination for CBDS avoided unnecessary ERC to 33 patients. Out of 47 patients with positive EUS (25 from the single session group and 22 from the double session), ERC confirmed the presence of CBDS in 46 cases (EUS sensitivity 100% and specificity 98%). Average time of procedure and hospitalization were significantly shorter in the single session group compared to the two session group. The single session strategy was also less expensive. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasonography plus ERC with sphincterotomy and stone extraction performed during the same endoscopic session was safe and efficacious with a reduction of procedure time, hospitalization and costs.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Coledocolitiasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endosonografía , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Endosonografía/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
9.
Pancreas ; 26(4): 334-8, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12717264

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The rate of complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is about 10%, and early complications have been reported in 20% of patients considered unfit for surgery. AIM: To evaluate the early and long-term results of endoscopic intervention in relation to the anesthesiological risk for 87 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. METHODOLOGY: All patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and were evaluated according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) criteria immediately before the operative procedure. Patients' ASA scores were as follows: 49.4%, ASA 2; 29.9%, ASA 3; and 20.7%, ASA 4. RESULTS: The severity of acute pancreatitis was positively related to the anesthesiological grade (p = 0.014). Six patients (6.9%) had complications related to the endoscopic procedure. There was no significant relationship between the frequency of biliopancreatic complications during the follow-up (23/84, 27.4%) and the ASA grade. The frequency of cholecystectomy was inversely related to the ASA grade (p = 0.003). Seven patients (8.3%) died during the follow-up period: multivariate analysis showed that the ASA grade (odds ratio [OR], 10.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-96.6; p = 0.001) and age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; p = 0.037) were significantly related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective in patients at high anesthesiological risk with acute pancreatitis, and survival is significantly related to the ASA grade.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Esfinterotomía Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Esfinterotomía Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA