RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review systematically the medical literature reporting on the prevalence of a niche at the site of a Cesarean section (CS) scar using various diagnostic methods, on potential risk factors for the development of a niche and on niche-related gynecological symptoms in non-pregnant women. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched. All types of clinical study reporting on the prevalence, risk factors and/or symptoms of a niche in non-pregnant women with a history of CS were included, apart from case reports and case series. RESULTS: Twenty-one papers were selected for inclusion in the review. A wide range in the prevalence of a niche was found. Using contrast-enhanced sonohysterography in a random population of women with a history of CS, the prevalence was found to vary between 56% and 84%. Nine studies reported on risk factors and each study evaluated different factors, which made it difficult to compare studies. Risk factors could be classified into four categories: those related to closure technique, to development of the lower uterine segment or location of the incision or to wound healing, and miscellaneous factors. Probable risk factors are single-layer myometrium closure, multiple CSs and uterine retroflexion. Six out of eight studies that evaluated niche-related symptoms described an association between the presence of a niche and postmenstrual spotting. CONCLUSIONS: The reported prevalence of a niche in non-pregnant women varies depending on the method of detection, the criteria used to define a niche and the study population. Potential risk factors can be categorized into four main categories, which may be useful for future research and meta-analyses. The predominant symptom associated with a niche is postmenstrual spotting.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cicatriz/complicaciones , Enfermedades Uterinas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Uterinas/epidemiología , Adulto , Cicatriz/epidemiología , Cicatriz/etiología , Dismenorrea/epidemiología , Dismenorrea/etiología , Femenino , Fertilidad , Humanos , Metrorragia/epidemiología , Metrorragia/etiología , Dolor Pélvico/epidemiología , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Uterinas/etiología , Enfermedades Uterinas/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between a niche and abnormal uterine bleeding, and to develop a sonographic classification of niches and evaluate its relationship to abnormal uterine bleeding. METHODS: An observational prospective cohort study was performed between October 2007 and May 2009. All women who had a Cesarean section performed in our hospital were asked to participate. Two hundred and twenty-five women were included and examined with both transvaginal sonography (TVS) and gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) 6-12 months after the Cesarean section. In case of a niche, the depth, volume and residual myometrium were measured, and the shape was assessed according to a specified classification. A questionnaire and pictorial blood loss assessment chart were filled in. RESULTS: The prevalence of a niche on evaluation with TVS and GIS was 24.0% and 56.0%, respectively. A niche was considered to be present if the depth was at least 1 mm visualized with GIS. Postmenstrual spotting was reported by 33.6% of women with a niche and 15.2% of women without a niche (P = 0.002). The niche volume was significantly different between women with and without postmenstrual spotting (P = 0.02). Most niches had a semicircular (50.4%) or triangular shape (31.6%). No significant relationship was identified between the shape of the niche and postmenstrual spotting (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: A niche is present in 56.0% of women with a history of Cesarean section when examined by GIS and is associated with postmenstrual spotting. Semicircular and triangular niches are most common, but the shape is not related to postmenstrual spotting.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Cicatriz/diagnóstico por imagen , Metrorragia/diagnóstico por imagen , Útero/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Cicatriz/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Metrorragia/etiología , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) with saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) as diagnostic methods for the evaluation of the uterine cavity. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, between September 2007 and April 2008. We included 65 women suspected of having an intrauterine abnormality with an indication for SCSH/GIS. First SCSH and subsequently GIS were performed in all women. Distension of the uterine cavity, image quality, visualization of intrauterine abnormalities and pain experienced on a visual analog scale (VAS score) were recorded for both procedures. RESULTS: The mean distension with GIS was 9.0 mm and with SCSH it was 8.5 mm (P = 0.15). The mean image quality, on a scale from 0 to 5, for SCSH was 4.0 and for GIS it was 3.6 (P = 0.01). No difference was found for the visualization of intrauterine abnormalities, and the VAS scores for pain experienced on SCSH and GIS were 1.5 and 1.6, respectively (P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: The image quality of SCSH is slightly better than that of GIS. This difference is likely to be attributable to the presence of air bubbles in the gel. The small difference in uterine cavity distension in favor of GIS and comparable stable distension during at least 4 min make GIS a suitable alternative for SCSH if air bubbles can be prevented.