RESUMEN
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Therefore, patients with AF require appropriate management and anticoagulant therapy. To balance therapy risks and benefits, oral anticoagulants (OAC) treatment should be 'tailored' in patients at a high risk of stroke and bleeding. However, some studies have demonstrated that certain groups of patients do not receive anticoagulants despite the high risk of stroke or thromboembolism. The study aimed to analyse therapeutic methods of stroke prevention in very high-risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥5 in men and ≥6 in women), identify factors predisposing against the use of OACs and assess the administration of anticoagulants before the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist OAC (NOAC) in 2004-2011 and beyond (years 2012-2019). The analysis covered 2441 patients with AF at a very high thromboembolic risk who were hospitalised in a reference cardiological centre from 2004 to 2019. Data concerning patients' sex, age, comorbidities, type of AF, renal and echocardiographic parameters, reasons for hospitalisation and applied treatment were collected from medical records. HAS-BLED, CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated for all patients. The treatment with oral anticoagulants was compared in the entire population over 2004-2011 and 2012-2019. In this study, a fifth of patients were not treated with OAC. Most patients hospitalised in the years 2012-2019 were treated with OAC. The predictors of not using OAC turned out to be: age of >74 years, heart failure, cancer, paroxysmal AF, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a reason for hospitalisation. The introduction of NOAC was associated with a decline in the use of VKA (from 62% to 19.1%) and APT (from 29.1% to 1.3%). This study outlines reasons to initiate OAC treatment in very high-risk patients in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tromboembolia , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Polonia/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Hemorragia/complicaciones , Tromboembolia/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend electrical cardioversion (ECV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after at least 3 weeks of adequate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment without prior transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). However, in clinical practice in some centres, TEE is performed before ECV in patients with AF. The aim of the study was to evaluate prevalence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with AF treated with NOACs and undergoing ECV without prior TEE. METHODS: This observational, multicentre study included consecutive patients with AF treated with NOACs who were admitted for ECV without prior TEE. Thromboembolic events and major bleeding complications were investigated during a 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: In the study group there were 611 patients, mean age was 66.3 ± 9.2 years, 40% were women. 52 (8.5%) patients had a low thromboembolic risk, 148 (24.2%) patients had an intermediate thromboembolic risk and 411 (67.2%) patients had a high thromboembolic risk. In the study group 253 (41.4%) patients were treated with rivaroxaban, 252 (41.2%) patients were treated with dabigatran and 106 (17.3%) patients were treated with apixaban. Reduced doses of NOACs were administered to 113 (18.9%) patients. In the entire study group, there were no thromboembolic events or major bleeding complications during the in-hospital stay and the 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this "real-world" study of AF patients treated with NOACs, it was proved that ECV is safe without a preceding TEE, regardless of the risk of thromboembolic complications and of the type of NOAC used.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Administración Oral , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/etiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common disease in elderly patients and thromboembolic complication prophylaxis significantly improves the prognosis in these patients. The study assessed the frequency of individual non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use among patients ≥75 years and attempted to identify factors predisposing to their prescription. METHODS: The data of patients with non-valvular AF hospitalized in the reference cardiology center between 2011 and 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 1443 analyzed patients, 329 (22.8%) received apixaban, 618 (42.8%) dabigatran, and 496 (34.4%) rivaroxaban. The entire population mean age was 82.3 ± 5 years, and 57.9% were females. Independent predictors of apixaban use were age, and bleeding history. Hospitalization for the implantation/reimplantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) reduced the chance of apixaban use. Hypertension was a predictor of dabigatran prescription. The chance of using dabigatran decreased with age. Hypertension and bleeding history decreased the chance of rivaroxaban application. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized AF patients ≥75 years, dabigatran was the most frequently used NOAC. Age, comorbidities and bleeding risk determined the selection of individual NOACs.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Hipertensión , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tromboembolia , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial/inducido químicamente , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hemorragia/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Masculino , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the recent years, antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has changed significantly. The main aim of this study is to assess the temporal trends of antithrombotic therapy and identify factors predisposing oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in stroke prevention in AF patients. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective, observational, single-center study, which includes consecutively hospitalized patients in the reference cardiology center from January 2004 to December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 9656 patients (43.7% female, mean age 71.2 years) with AF between 2004-2019 are included. Among the total study population, in most of the patients (81.1%), OAC therapy was used, antiplatelet (APT) therapy was prescribed for 13.5% patients, heparins for 2.1% patients and 3.3% of patients did not receive any stroke prevention. OAC prescription significantly increased from 61.6% in 2004 to 97.4% in 2019. The independent predictors of OAC prescription were: the period of hospitalization, non-paroxysmal AF, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous thromboembolism, hospitalization due to electrical cardioversion, ablation or AF without any procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized patients with AF, during sixteen years of the study period, a significant increase in OAC use and a decrease in APT use were noted. Factors other than these included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score were independent predictors of OAC use.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prescripciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although guidelines endorse cardioversion after adequate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment without prior transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), the majority of patients still undergo this examination. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess factors determining the decision to perform TEE in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are eligible for elective cardioversion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the medical records of consecutive patients with AF who were admitted for elective cardioversion after prior NOAC treatment. RESULTS: Of a total of 668 patients included in the study, 362 individuals (54%) underwent TEE before cardioversion. In the univariable analysis, paroxysmal AF, hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), thromboembolic events, a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, a history of bleeding, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, a reduced dose of NOACs, hemoglobin levels, impaired renal filtration, and a high CHA2DS2VASc score were significant predictors of the decision to perform TEE. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a history of CAD, bleeding, and stroke / transient ischemic attack / thromboembolism remained independent predictors of referring a patient for TEE (odds ratio [OR], 3.92, P <0.001; OR, 7.92, P <0.001; and OR, 2.36, P = 0.02, respectively). In contrast, paroxysmal AF (OR, 0.31; P = 0.02) and hypertension (OR, 0.28; P <0.001) were indicators of refraining from TEE. CONCLUSIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion was more frequently performed in patients with a history of CAD, bleeding, or thromboembolic events. Patients with paroxysmal AF and hypertension more often received cardioversion without prior TEE.