RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children with medical complexity (CMC) have multiple chronic conditions and require a high level of coordinated healthcare. The risk of COVID-19 among CMC is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We aim to identify and describe the prevalence and experience of COVID-19 among CMC and their caregivers during the initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in the NY metropolitan area. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of children enrolled in a structured clinical program for CMC at a large urban, academic general pediatrics practice in NY. RESULTS: In our patient population (n = 132), 16 patients had a known exposure with parents being the most common exposure in 37.5% (n = 6). Two patients were hospitalized for COVID-19 while the remainder of the confirmed or suspected COVID-19 cases were managed as an outpatient. CONCLUSIONS: Common sources of COVID-19 exposure were family members and home care providers. Almost all of our patients experienced interruption of medical care including missed therapies and visits.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Efficacy of multi-disciplinary weight management (MDM) in youth has not been compared to their routine care. OBJECTIVES: To compare body mass index z-score (zBMI) and blood test (lab) changes (Δ) in youth before and after MDM and to correlate bio-impedance analysis (BIA) and lab measurements. METHODS: We compared zBMI Δ (from referring providers' records), within 3 months prior to MDM, to monthly zBMI Δ after MDM, in a retrospective cohort of youth at a tertiary MDM center. BIA and lab measurements after 6 months, MDM were compared to baseline. RESULTS: We reviewed 316 records (12.9 ± 3.5 years, 49% males, 104.8 ± 35.1 kgs). The pre-MDM zBMI Δ (0.02 ± 0.1) was reversed after MDM (-0.03 ± 0.09, visit 2, P < 0.001). The zBMI Δ progressed on follow-up (-0.14 ± 0.05, visit 6). Baseline BIA components correlated with Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure. HbA1c, HOMA-IR, and liver functions significantly improved on follow-up. MDM participation showed progressive attrition and dropped to 11.6% at visit 6. CONCLUSION: MDM in youth resulted in zBMI and lab improvements compared to their pre-MDM measurements. BIA provided additional outcome measures that correlated with metabolic markers. MDM follow-up was limited by the progressive participant drop-out. Behavioral economic strategies are needed to improve adherence.

Asunto(s)

Composición Corporal , Impedancia Eléctrica , Obesidad Infantil/terapia , Programas de Reducción de Peso/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad Infantil/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effects of nonoperative treatments on surgical outcomes for patients who failed conservative management for cervical spine pathologies remain unknown. The objective is to describe conservative modality use in patients indicated for surgery for degenerative cervical spine conditions and its impact on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: The current study comprises a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database. A total of 1522 patients with 1- to 2-level degenerative cervical pathology who were undergoing surgical intervention were included. Outcome measures used were health-related quality-of-life scores, length of hospitalization, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, and return-to-work status at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were grouped by diagnosis (radiculopathy vs. myelopathy), then divided based on epidural injection(s), physical therapy (PT), or opioid use prior to enrollment. Univariate t-tests and χ2 tests were performed to determine differences between groups and impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1319 radiculopathy patients, 25.7% received preoperative epidural injections, 35.3% received PT, and 35.5% received opioids. Radiculopathy patients who received epidurals and PT had higher 1-year postoperative return-to-work rates (P < .05). Radiculopathy patients without preoperative PT had longer hospitalization times, whereas those who received PT had higher 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning and physical component scores, lower 2-year visual analog scale (VAS) neck/arm pain scores, and higher 2-year return-to-work incidence (P < .05). Of myelopathy patients (n = 203), 14.8% received epidural injections, 25.1% received opioids, and 41.5% received PT. Myelopathy patients with preoperative PT had worse VAS arm pain scores 2 years postoperatively (P < .05). Patients receiving opioids were younger and had greater baseline-2-year Neck Disability Index improvement (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Radiculopathy patients receiving epidurals returned to work after 1 year more frequently. PT was associated with shorter hospitalizations, greater SF-36 bodily pain norm and physical component score improvements, and increased return-to-work rates after 1 and 2 years. No statistically significant nonoperative treatment was associated with return-to-work rate in myelopathy patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest certain preoperative conservative treatment modalities are associated with improved outcomes in radiculopathy patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Informed patient selection and counseling is key in improving surgical outcomes. Understanding the impact that certain baseline variables can have on postoperative outcomes is essential in optimizing treatment for certain symptoms, such as radiculopathy from cervical spine pathologies. The aim was to identify baseline characteristics that were related to improved or worsened postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine radiculopathic pain. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patient Sample: Surgical cervical spine patients with a diagnosis classification of "degenerative." Diagnoses included in the "degenerative" category were those that caused radiculopathy: cervical disc herniation, cervical stenosis, and cervical spondylosis without myelopathy. Baseline variables considered as predictors were: (1) age, (2) body mass index (BMI), (3) gender, (4) history of cervical spine surgery, (5) baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, (6) baseline SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores, (7) baseline SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores, (8) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Arm score, and (9) VAS Neck. Outcome Measures: Improvement in NDI (≥50%), VAS Arm/Neck (≥50%), SF-36 PCS/MCS (≥10%) scores at 2-years postoperative. An arm-to-neck ratio (ANR) was also generated from baseline VAS scores. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated predictors for 2-year postoperative outcome improvements, controlling for surgical complications and technique. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-eight patients were included. Patients with ANR ≤ 1 (n = 214) were less likely to reach improvements in 2-year NDI (30.0% vs 39.2%, P = .050) and SF-36 PCS (42.4% vs 53.5%, P = .025). Multivariate analysis for neck disability revealed higher baseline SF-36 PCS (odds ratio [OR] 1.053) and MCS (OR 1.028) were associated with over 50% improvements. Higher baseline NDI were reduced odds of postoperative neck pain improvement (OR 0.958). Arm pain greater than neck pain at baseline was associated with both increased odds of postoperative arm pain improvement (OR 1.707) and SF36 PCS improvement (OR 1.495). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified specific symptom locations and health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores, which were associated with postoperative pain and disability improvement. In particular, baseline arm pain greater than neck pain was determined to have the greatest impact on whether patients met at least 50% improvement in their upper body pain score. These findings are important for clinicians to optimize patient outcomes through effective preoperative counseling.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: History of previous cervical spine surgery is a frequently cited cause of worse outcomes after cervical spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine any differences in clinical outcomes after cervical spine surgery between patients with and without a history of previous cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A multicenter prospective database was reviewed retrospectively to identify patients with cervical spondylosis undergoing surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with (W) or without (WO) previous history of cervical spine surgery. Statistical analyses of Health-Related Quality of Life scores were analyzed with statistical software to fit linear mixed models for continuous longitudinal outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1286 patients (377 W, 909 WO) met criteria for inclusion. Overall, patients in both groups experienced an improvement in their Health-Related Quality of Life scores. However, patients in the W group had significantly decreased improvement compared with WO patients in the Neck Disability Index score and the following SF-36 domain scores: Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Health Transition, and Physical Component Summary at all time points (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the W and WO groups in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, or complications (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of previous cervical spine surgery had inferior improvement in quality of life outcome scores. Patients with a history of previous surgical intervention who elect to undergo subsequent surgeries should be appropriately counseled about expected results.

Asunto(s)

Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the baseline patient characteristics, nonoperative modalities, surgical procedures, and complications rates of surgical cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients. To evaluate risk factors for developing complications and compare the changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) from baseline to 2 years postoperatively. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively collected database of CSM patients. Baseline patient demographic data, comorbidities, clinical information, nonoperative treatment modalities, surgical procedures, and complication rates were collected. HRQOL outcomes were assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Score Component (PCS) and Mental Score Component (MCS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) at baseline and 2 years postoperatively. Statistical analyses included paired-sample t tests and multivariate logistic regression controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: A total of 203 surgical CSM patients were identified (43% female). Average age was 57.7 years and average BMI was 29.6 kg/m2. Before surgical intervention, patients underwent various nonoperative treatment modalities, most commonly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (34%), analgesics (32%), and physical therapy (26%). The overall rate of complications was 7.4%. Complications included cerebrospinal fluid leak (2.5%), postoperative radiculopathy (1.0%), and excessive bleeding (1.0%). A previous history of cervical spine surgery was the sole significant risk factor for developing a complication (odds ratio, 9.22; P = 0.034). Average HRQOL scores improved significantly from baseline to 2 years postsurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate was 7.4% for the cohort. Baseline clinical information, comorbidities, use of nonoperative treatment modalities, and procedure type were not significantly associated with an increased risk of complications. Previous cervical spine surgery increased the risk of complications by 9-fold. The patients showed significantly improved SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, and NDI scores at 2 years after surgery.

Asunto(s)

Vértebra Cervical Axis/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Discectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Radiculopatía/epidemiología , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Espondilosis/cirugía , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Oportunidad Relativa , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Espondilosis/complicaciones

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show increases in cervical spine surgery prevalence and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) diagnoses in the US. However, few studies have examined outcomes for CSM surgical management, particularly on a nationwide scale. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate national trends from 2001 to 2010 for CSM patient surgical approach, postoperative outcomes, and hospital characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective nationwide database analysis provided by the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) including CSM patients aged 25+ who underwent anterior and/or posterior cervical fusion or laminoplasty from 2001 to 2010. Patients with fractures, 9+ levels fused, or any cancer were excluded. Measures included demographics, hospital data, and procedure-related complications. Yearly trends were analyzed using linear regression modeling. RESULTS: 54,348 discharge cases were identified. ACDF, posterior only, and combined anterior/posterior approach volumes significantly increased from 2001 to 2010 (98.62%, 303.07%, and 576.19%; respectively, p<0.05). However, laminoplasty volume remained unchanged (p>0.05). Total charges for ACDF, posterior only, combined anterior/posterior, and laminoplasty approaches all significantly increased (138.72%, 176.74%, 182.48%, and 144.85%, respectively; p<0.05). For all procedures, overall mortality significantly decreased by 45.34% (p=0.001) and overall morbidity increased by 33.82% (p=0.0002). For all procedures except ACDF, which saw a significantly decrease by 8.75% (p<0.0001), length of hospital stay was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: For CSM patients between 2001 and 2010, combined surgical approach increased sixfold, posterior only approach increased threefold, and ACDF doubled; laminoplasties without fusion volume remained the same. Mortality decreased whereas morbidity and total charges increased. Length of stay decreased only for ACDF approach. This study provides clinically useful data to direct future research, improving patient outcomes.

Asunto(s)

Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Espondilosis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Laminoplastia/efectos adversos , Laminoplastia/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/tendencias , Espondilosis/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospective data from the degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) arm of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for DS and compare outcomes between patients who underwent reoperation with nonreoperative patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have examined outcomes following surgery for DS, but few have identified risk factors for reoperation. METHODS: Analysis included patients with neurogenic claudication (>12 weeks), clinical neurological signs, spinal stenosis, and DS on standing lateral x-rays. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate patient characteristics and risk factors. Treatment effects (TEs) were calculated and compared between study groups. RESULTS: Of 406 patients, 72% underwent instrumented fusion, 21% noninstrumented fusion, and 7% decompression alone. At 8 years, the reoperation rate was 22%, of which 28% occurred within 1 year, 54% within 2 years, 70% within 4 years, and 86% within 6 years. The reasons for reoperation included recurrent stenosis or progressive spondylolisthesis (45%), complications such as hematoma, dehiscence, or infection (36%), or new condition (14%). Reoperative patients were younger (62.2 vs. 65.3, P = 0.008). Significant risk factors were use of antidepressants (P = 0.008, hazard ratio [HR] 2.08) or having no neurogenic claudication upon enrollment (P = 0.02, HR 1.82). Patients who were smokers, diabetics, obese, or on workman's compensation were not at greater risk for reoperation. At 8-year follow-up, scores for SF-36 bodily pain (BP), Oswestry Disability Index, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/Modems version (ODI), and stenosis frequency index were better in nonreoperative patients. TE favored nonreoperative patients for SF-36 BP, physical function, ODI, Stenosis Bothersomeness Index, and satisfaction with symptoms (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of reoperation for patients with DS was 22% 8 years following surgery. Patients with a history of no neurogenic claudication and patients taking antidepressants were more likely to undergo reoperation. Outcome scores and TE were more favorable in nonreoperative patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Asunto(s)

Traumatismos en Atletas/cirugía , Análisis de Datos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/tendencias , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Anciano , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Dolor de Espalda/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estenosis Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Espinal/epidemiología , Espondilolistesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Espondilolistesis/epidemiología , Deportes/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective subgroup analysis was performed on surgically treated patients from the lumbar spinal stenosis (SpS) arm of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT), randomized, and observational cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for SpS and compare outcomes between patients who underwent reoperation with those who did not. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SpS is one of the most common indications for surgery in the elderly; however, few long-term studies have identified risk factors for reoperation. METHODS: A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed on patients from the SpS arm of the SPORT, randomized and observational cohorts. Baseline characteristics were analyzed between reoperation and no-reoperation groups using univariate and multivariate analysis on data 8 years postoperation. RESULTS: Of the 417 study patients, 88% underwent decompression only, 5% noninstrumented fusion, and 6% instrumented fusion. At the 8-year follow-up, the reoperation rate was 18%; 52% of reoperations were for recurrent stenosis or progressive spondylolisthesis, 25% for complication or other reason, and 16% for new condition. Of patients who underwent a reoperation, 42% did so within 2 years, 70% within 4 years, and 84% within 6 years. Patients who underwent reoperation were less likely to have presented with any neurological deficit (43% reop vs. 57% no reop, P = 0.04). Patients improved less at follow-up in the reoperation group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgical treatment for SpS, the reoperation rate at 8-year follow-up was 18%. Patients with a reoperation were less likely to have a baseline neurological deficit. Patients who did not undergo reoperation had better patient reported outcomes at 8-year follow-up compared with those who had repeat surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Asunto(s)

Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Reoperación/tendencias , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Estadística como Asunto/tendencias , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/métodos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/tendencias , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estenosis Espinal/diagnóstico , Estadística como Asunto/métodos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lumbar discectomy and laminectomy in patients with intervertebral disc herniation (IDH) is common, with variable reported reoperation rates. Our study examined which baseline characteristics might be risk factors for reoperation and compared outcomes between patients who underwent reoperation and those who did not. METHODS: We performed a retrospective subgroup analysis of patients from the IDH arm of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. We analyzed baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent reoperation and those who did not with use of data collected from enrollment through eight-years of follow-up after surgery. Follow-up times were measured from the time of surgery, and baseline covariates were updated to the follow-up immediately preceding the time of surgery for outcomes analyses. RESULTS: At eight years, the reoperation rate was 15% (691 no reoperation; 119 reoperation). Sixty-two percent of these patients underwent reoperation because of a recurrent disc herniation; 25%, because of a complication or other factor; and 11%, because of a new condition. The proportion of reoperations that were performed for a recurrent disc herniation ranged from 58% to 62% in the individual years. Older patients were less likely to have reoperation (p = 0.015), as were patients presenting with asymmetric motor weakness at baseline (p = 0.0003). Smoking, diabetes, obesity, Workers' Compensation, and clinical depression were not associated with a greater risk of reoperation. Scores on the Short Form (SF)-36 for bodily pain and physical functioning, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Sciatica Bothersomeness Index as well as satisfaction with symptoms had improved less at the time of follow-up in the reoperation group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent surgery for IDH, the overall reoperation rate was 15% at the eight-year follow-up. Patients of older age and patients presenting with asymmetric motor weakness were less likely to undergo a reoperation. Less improvement in patient-reported outcomes was noted in the reoperation group.

Asunto(s)

Discectomía/efectos adversos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares , Calidad de Vida , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Discectomía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Radiografía , Recurrencia , Reoperación/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. OBJECTIVE: To investigate national trends, risks, and benefits of surgical interventions for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The surgical management of DS continues to evolve whereas the most clinically and cost-effective treatment is debated. With an aging US population and growing restraints on a financially burdened health care system, a clear understanding of national trends in the surgical management of DS is needed. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients with DS undergoing lumbar fusions from 2001 to 2010, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis and procedure codes. Analyses compared instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), posterolateral fusion with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF + PLF), PLF with posterior interbody fusion (P/TLIF + PLF), anterior instrumented interbody fusion (ALIF), and posterior interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation (P/TLIF). Clinical data were analyzed representing the initial acute phase care after surgery. RESULTS: There were 48,911 DS surgical procedures identified, representing 237,383 procedures. The percentage of patients undergoing PLF, ALIF + PLF, or ALIF increased whereas the percentage of P/TLIF or P/TLIF + PLF decreased over time. Total charges were less (P < 0.001), average length of hospital stay was shorter (P < 0.01), and average age was older (P < 0.01) for patients who underwent PLF compared with any other procedure. Type of procedure varied on the basis of the geographic region of the hospital, teaching versus nonteaching hospital, and size of hospital (P < 0.01). Patients who had P/TLIF + PLF or ALIF had a higher risk of mortality than patients who had PLF (odds ratios: 5.02, 2.22, respectively). Patients were more likely to develop a complication if they had ALIF + PLF, P/TLIF + PLF, ALIF, and P/TLIF than if they had PLF (odds ratios: 1.45, 1.23, 1.49, 1.12, respectively). CONCLUSION: Variation in the surgical management of DS related to patient demographics, hospital charges, length of hospital stay, insurance type, comorbidities, and complication rates was found within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. During the acute phase of care immediately after surgery, PLF procedures were found to reduce length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Asunto(s)

Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/tendencias , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Proteínas de Drosophila , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spine surgery is usually associated with large amount of blood loss, necessitating blood transfusions. Blood loss-associated morbidity can be because of direct risks, such as hypotension and organ damage, or as a result of blood transfusions. The antifibrinolytic, tranexamic acid (TXA), is a lysine analog that inhibits activation of plasminogen and has shown to be beneficial in reducing surgical blood loss. PURPOSE: To consolidate the findings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of TXA on surgical bleeding in spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A metaanalysis. STUDY SAMPLE: Randomized controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of intravenous TXA in reducing blood loss in spine surgery, compared with a placebo/no treatment group. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, and Google Scholar were used to identify RCTs published before January 2014 that examined the effectiveness of intravenous TXA on reduction of blood loss and blood transfusions, compared with a placebo/no treatment group in spine surgery. Metaanalysis was performed using RevMan 5. Weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals was used to summarize the findings across the trials for continuous outcomes. Dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. A p<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included for TXA (644 total patients). Tranexamic acid reduced intraoperative, postoperative, and total blood loss by an average of 219 mL ([-322, -116], p<.05), 119 mL ([-141, -98], p<.05), and 202 mL ([-299, -105], p<.05), respectively. Tranexamic acid led to a reduction in proportion of patients who received a blood transfusion (risk ratio 0.67 [0.54, 0.83], p<.05) relative to placebo. There was one myocardial infarction (MI) in the TXA group and one deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid reduces surgical bleeding and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing spine surgery. Tranexamic acid does not appear to be associated with an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism, DVT, or MI.

Asunto(s)

Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of a high-throughput, easily implemented, cost-effective, video analysis software-based mobility protocol to quantify spine kinematics. This prospective cohort study of clinical biomechanics implemented 2-dimensional (2D) image processing at a tertiary-care academic institution. Ten healthy, able-bodied volunteers were recruited for 2D videography of gait and functional motion. The reliability of a 2D video analysis software program for gait and range of motion metrics was evaluated over 2 independent experimental sessions, assessing for inter-trial, inter-session, and inter-rater reliability. Healthy volunteers were evaluated for simple forward and side bending, rotation, treadmill stride length, and more complex seated-to-standing tasks. Based on established intraclass correlation coefficients, results indicated that reliability was considered good to excellent for simple forward and side bending, rotation, stride length, and more complex sit-to-standing tasks. In conclusion, a cost-effective, 2D, video analysis software-based mobility protocol represents a feasible and clinically useful approach for objective spine kinematics and gait metrics. As the complication rate of operative management in the setting of spinal deformity is weighed against functional performance and quality of life measures, an objective analysis tool in combination with an appropriate protocol will aid in clinical assessments and lead to an increased evidence base for management options and decision algorithms.

Asunto(s)

Marcha/fisiología , Actividad Motora/fisiología , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Programas Informáticos , Columna Vertebral/fisiología , Grabación en Video , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

To achieve optimal results after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), radiographic parameters must be aligned with motion and performance. The effects of fusion on balance are poorly understood. Center of mass (COM) excursion and instantaneous interaction with center of pressure (COP) provides information about patients' balancing ability during gait. This study investigates the interaction between COM and COP (COM-COP) in AIS patients before and one year after spine fusion and determines what radiographic goals predict restoration of harmonious COM-COP. This was a prospective study that investigated sixteen adolescents with AIS curvature >30˚ requiring surgical correction. Clinical outcomes measures, X-rays, and 3D motion-capture gait analysis were collected. Sagittal and coronal COM and COP offsets and inclination angles were calculated from positional data. COM excursion was calculated as peak COM displacement based on mediolateral and vertical deviation from a line fitted to the patient's path. Radiographic parameters were measured to determine variables predictive of change in COM excursion. Post-operatively, average COM peak displacement decreased (42.6 to 13.1 mm, p=0.001) and COM peak vertical displacement remained unchanged (17.0 to 16.3 mm, p=0.472). COM-COP inclination angles reduced in the coronal, but not sagittal plane. Coronal lower extremity peak inclination angles reduced (8.8˚ to 7.5˚, p=0.025), correlating with C7 plumb-line offset (R=0.581, p=0.018). Thoracic Cobb, thoracic kyphosis, and C7 plumb-line were predictors of change in COM excursion. Mediolateral COM excursion post-surgery may reflect an attempt to reduce kinetic demands with improved spinal alignment. Although AIS correction has historically focused on the coronal plane, sagittal parameters may be more important for motion than previously theorized.

Asunto(s)

Marcha/fisiología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Escoliosis/fisiopatología , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Cinética , Masculino , Presión , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Three-column resection osteotomies (3COs) are commonly performed for sagittal deformity but have high rates of reported complications. Authors of this study aimed to examine the incidence of and intercenter variability in major intraoperative complications (IOCs), major postoperative complications (POCs) up to 6 weeks postsurgery, and overall complications (that is, both IOCs and POCs). They also aimed to investigate the incidence of and intercenter variability in blood loss during 3CO procedures. METHODS: The incidence of IOCs, POCs, and overall complications associated with 3COs were retrospectively determined for the study population and for each of 8 participating surgical centers. The incidence of major blood loss (MBL) over 4 L and the percentage of total blood volume lost were also determined for the study population and each surgical center. Complication rates and blood loss were compared between patients with one and those with two osteotomies, as well as between patients with one thoracic osteotomy (ThO) and those with one lumbar or sacral osteotomy (LSO). Risk factors for developing complications were determined. RESULTS: Retrospective review of prospectively acquired data for 423 consecutive patients who had undergone 3CO at 8 surgical centers was performed. The incidence of major IOCs, POCs, and overall complications was 7%, 39%, and 42%, respectively, for the study population overall. The most common IOC was spinal cord deficit (2.6%) and the most common POC was unplanned return to the operating room (19.4%). Patients with two osteotomies had more POCs (56% vs 38%, p = 0.04) than the patients with one osteotomy. Those with ThO had more IOCs (16% vs 6%, p = 0.03), POCs (58% vs 34%, p < 0.01), and overall complications (67% vs 37%, p < 0.01) than the patients with LSO. There was significant variation in the incidence of IOCs, POCs, and overall complications among the 8 sites (p < 0.01). The incidence of MBL was 24% for the study population, which varied significantly between sites (p < 0.01). Patients with MBL had a higher risk of IOCs, POCs, and overall complications (OR 2.15, 1.76, and 2.01, respectively). The average percentage of total blood volume lost was 55% for the study population, which also varied among sites (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity of 3COs for spinal deformity, it is important for spine surgeons to understand the risk factors and complication rates associated with these procedures. In this study, the overall incidence of major complications following 3CO procedures was 42%. Risks for developing complications included an older age (> 60 years), two osteotomies, ThO, and MBL.

Asunto(s)

Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cervical drains have historically been used to avoid postoperative wound and respiratory complications such as excessive edema, hematoma, infection, re-intubation, delayed extubation, or respiratory distress. Recently, some surgeons have ceased using drains because they may prolong hospital stay, operative time, or patient discomfort. The objective of this retrospective case-control series is to investigate the effectiveness of postoperative drains following one- and two-level cervical fusions. METHODS: A chart review was conducted at a single institution from 2010-2013. Outcome measures included operative time, hospital stay, estimated blood loss and incidence of wound complications (infection, hematoma, edema, and complications with wound healing or evacuation), respiratory complications (delayed extubation, re-intubation, and respiratory treatment), and overall complications (wound complications, respiratory complications, dysphagia, and other complications). Statistical analyses including independent samples t-test, chi-square, analysis of covariance, and linear regression were used to compare patients who received a postoperative drain to those who did not. RESULTS: The study population included 39 patients who received a postoperative drain and 42 patients who did not. There were no differences in demographics between the two groups. Patients with drains showed increased operative time (100.1 vs 69.3 min, p < 0.001), hospital stay (38.9 vs. 31.7 hrs, p = 0.021), and blood loss (62.7 vs 29.1 mL, p < 0.001) compared to patients without drains. The frequency of wound complications, respiratory complications, and overall complications did not vary significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cervical drains may not be necessary for patients undergoing one- and two-level cervical fusion. While there were no differences in incidence of complications between groups, patients treated with drains had significantly longer operative time and length of hospital stay. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This could contribute to excessive costs for patients treated with drains, despite the lack of compelling evidence of the advantages of this treatment in the literature and in the current study.

RESUMEN

Study Type Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database. Introduction Three-column resection osteotomies (3CO), including pedicle subtraction osteotomies and vertebral column resections are performed for correction of sagittal deformity; however, they have high rates of reported complications. This study examined the incidence and intercenter variability of major intraoperative complications (IOC), postoperative complications (POC), and overall complications (IOC + POC) up to 6 weeks postoperation. Objective The aim of the study is to examine the incidence and intercenter variability of major complications associated with 3CO. Patients and Methods A retrospective review of patients with 3CO from eight different sites was performed. The incidence and types of complications were determined for the study population (N = 423). The analysis compared patients with one (n = 391) and two (n = 32) osteotomies, as well as patients with a thoracic osteotomy (ThO) (n = 72) versus a lumbosacral osteotomy (LSO) (n = 319) of the spine. Subsequent analysis was performed to compare sites with low-osteotomy volumes (< 50 patients) to sites with large osteotomy volumes (more than 50 patients). Major blood loss (MBL) was defined as more than 4L. Results Of the 423 patients, the incidence of major IOC, POC, and overall complications was 28, 45, and 58%, respectively (Table 1). The most common major IOC was MBL (24%) and the most common POC was unplanned return to the operating room (OR) (19%). Other IOC included cord deficit (2.6%), pneumothorax (1.5%), large vessel injury (1.7%), nerve root injury (1.4%), and cardiac arrest (0.2%). Other POC included motor deficit (12.1%), deep infection (7.6%), acute respiratory distress/failure (4.7%), deep venous thrombosis (3.1%), pulmonary embolism (2.8%), arrhythmia (1.2%), reintubation and sepsis (0.7%), cauda equine syndrome, myocardial infarction, visual deficit, stroke (0.5%), and death (0.2%). Patients with one 3CO had significantly less POC (43 vs. 69%, p < 0.01) and overall complications (57 vs. 75%, p < 0.01) than patients with two 3CO (Fig. 1). IOC, MBL, and return to the OR were not significantly different between groups. Patients with ThO had significantly more POC (66 vs. 39%, p < 0.01) and overall complications (76 vs. 53%, p < 0.001) than patients with LSO. Patients with LSO had more MBL (25 vs. 14%, p = 0.04). Patients with ThO had more unplanned return to OR (41 vs. 14%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). The incidence of IOC was greater for the low-volume sites than high-volume sites (46 vs. 23%, p < 0.001). Low-volume sites had a higher frequency of patients with MBL than high-volume sites (45 vs. 18%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Patients who experienced MBL had a significantly longer operating time (p < 0.001) and a higher risk of developing other IOC, POC, and overall complications (OR = 2.18, 1.51, 1.63, respectively) than patients who did not experience substantial blood loss. Conclusions The overall incidence of complications was 58% following 3CO surgery. There was significant variation in incidence of complications depending on the number, location, and experience of performing osteotomies. Risks for developing complications included having two osteotomies, ThO, surgery at a low-volume center, and blood loss more than 4 L. With a better understanding of 3CO complications and risk factors, physicians may be more informed in the decision-making process of sagittal plane deformity correction.