RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: No previous study has assessed the outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation (C-RFA) of the medial branch nerves (MBN) for the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain nor compared its effectiveness with traditional RFA (T-RFA). This study evaluated 6-month outcomes for pain, function, psychometrics, and medication usage in patients who underwent MBN C-RFA versus T-RFA for lumbar Z-joint pain. METHODS: In this blinded, prospective trial, patients with positive diagnostic MBN blocks (>75% relief) were randomized to MBN C-RFA or T-RFA. The primary outcome was the proportion of 'responders' (≥50% Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) reduction) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included NRS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Patient Global Impression of Change. RESULTS: Forty-three participants were randomized to MBN C-RFA (n=21) or T-RFA (n=22). There were no significant differences in demographic variables (p>0.05). A ≥50% NRS reduction was observed in 52% (95% CI 31% to 74%) and 44% (95% CI 22% to 69%) of participants in the C-RFA and T-RFA groups, respectively (p=0.75). A ≥15-point or ≥30% reduction in ODI score was observed in 62% (95% CI 38% to 82%) and 44% (95% CI 22% to 69%) of participants in the C-RFA and T-RFA groups, respectively (p=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: When using a single diagnostic block paradigm with a threshold of >75% pain reduction, both treatment with both C-RFA and T-RFA resulted in a success rate of approximately 50% when defined by both improvement in pain and physical function at 6-month follow-up. While the success rate was higher in the C-RFA group, this difference was not statistically significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02478437.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/terapia , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Crioterapia/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares , Articulación Cigapofisaria , Adulto , Anciano , Artralgia/diagnóstico por imagen , Ablación por Catéter/tendencias , Crioterapia/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Articulación Cigapofisaria/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for patients with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis; however, little is known about factors that predict procedure success. The current study evaluated the utility of genicular nerve blocks to predict the outcome of genicular nerve cooled radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) in patients with osteoarthritis. Methods: This randomized comparative trial included patients with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to receive a genicular nerve block or no block prior to cRFA. Patients receiving a prognostic block that demonstrated ≥50% pain relief for six hours received cRFA. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in knee pain at six months. Results: Twenty-nine participants (36 knees) had cRFA following a prognostic block, and 25 patients (35 knees) had cRFA without a block. Seventeen participants (58.6%) in the prognostic block group and 16 (64.0%) in the no block group had ≥50% pain relief at six months (P = 0.34). A 15-point decrease in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at six months was present in 17 of 29 (55.2%) in the prognostic block group and 15 of 25 (60%) in the no block group (P = 0.36). Conclusions: This study demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in pain and physical function up to six months following cRFA. A prognostic genicular nerve block using a local anesthetic volume of 1 mL at each injection site and a threshold of ≥ 50% pain relief for subsequent cRFA eligibility did not improve the rate of treatment success.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with difficulty in obtaining imaging studies. While there is a small body of literature regarding the relationship between fluoroscopy time and BMI during injections for pain management, this has not been studied for intraarticular (IA) hip injections. Further, in academic training centers, trainee involvement may affect this relationship. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between BMI and fluoroscopy time during IA hip injections, both with and without involvement of a trainee. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three academic, outpatient musculoskeletal and pain medicine centers. METHODS: Patients who underwent fluoroscopically guided IA hip injections with encounter data regarding fluoroscopy time during the procedure and BMI were included. Mean and standard deviation fluoroscopy time were recorded. Comparisons were made between BMI categories of normal (18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0 - 29.9 kg/m2), and obese (greater than or equal to30.0 kg/m2). Statistical significance was set at P = 0.01 due to multiple comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 559 IA hip injections are represented in this cohort. Patients had a mean age of 58 (standard deviation [SD] 14) years and 63% were women. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time when comparing BMI categories (P = 0.02). However, when trainees were not involved in the injection, fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter with decreasing BMI category, with normal weight patients requiring the shortest fluoroscopy times (P = 0.01). LIMITATIONS: This study evaluated total fluoroscopy time, not radiation dose exposure per injection, which provides more direct and precise information with regard to provider and patient radiation exposure and overall safety. Future study of the impact of BMI on radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided IA hip injections is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy times during IA hip injections increase with higher BMI categories in a statistically significant manner when performed by experienced clinicians but this relationship is not observed when injections are performed with a trainee in a teaching institution. This finding appears to be related to longer fluoroscopy time required to complete an IA hip injection in patients with lower BMI when a trainee is involved. KEY WORDS: Hip, injections, obesity, overweight, body mass index, fluoroscopy, radiation, pain.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Cadera , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Obesidad , Adulto , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Determine outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation (C-RFA) of the genicular nerves for treatment of chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Academic pain medicine center. SUBJECTS: Consecutive patients with knee OA and 50% or greater pain relief following genicular nerve blocks who underwent genicular nerve C-RFA. METHODS: Survey administration six or more months after C-RFA. Pain numeric rating scale (NRS), Medication Quantification Scale III (MQSIII), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) data were collected. Logistic regression was used to identify factors that predicted treatment success. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (52 discrete knees) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-five percent (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22-48) of procedures resulted in the combined outcome of 50% or greater reduction in NRS score, reduction of 3.4 or more points in MQSIII score, and PGIC score consistent with "very much improved/improved." Nineteen percent (95% CI = 10-33) of procedures resulted in complete pain relief. Greater duration of pain and greater than 80% pain relief from diagnostic blocks were identified as predictors of treatment success. The accuracy of the model was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.78-0.97, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Genicular C-RFA demonstrated a success rate of 35% based on a robust combination of outcome measures, and 19% of procedures resulted in complete relief of pain at a minimum of six months of follow-up. Report of 80% or greater relief from diagnostic blocks and duration of pain of less than five years are associated with high accuracy in predicting treatment success. Further prospective study is needed to optimize the patient selection protocol and success rate of this procedure.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/cirugía , Desnervación/métodos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: No study has compared cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI) with epidural catheter advancement to the side and level of pathology versus standard C7-T1 CIESI. This study investigated whether cervical radicular pain is more effectively treated by CIESI with a targeted epidural catheter versus a standard C7-T1 approach. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain at 1 month. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Oswestry Neck Disability Index (ONDI), Pain Disability Index (PDI), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), daily morphine equivalents (DME), and Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) III scores. RESULTS: Seventy-six participants with a median age of 48 years (IQR, 40-56 years), 59% female, with C4 (n = 2), C5 (n = 27), or C6 (n = 47) radicular pain were enrolled. At 1 month in the catheter and no catheter groups, respectively: 26 (72%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 57%-87%) and 23 (60%; 95% CI, 45%-75%) participants reported 50% or greater NRS reduction; 24 (67%; 95% CI, 52%-84%) and 23 (58%; 95% CI, 42%-73%) participants reported 30% or greater ONDI reduction. There were no group differences in median NRS, ONDI, PDI, MPQ, PGIC, DME, or MQSIII scores (P > 0.05). Intergroup differences were not observed at any follow-up interval. CONCLUSIONS: This trial showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes with CIESI using a targeted epidural catheter compared to a standard C7-T1 approach for the treatment of unilateral cervical radicular pain at the C5 or C6 level. Both techniques were associated with clinically meaningful improvement across outcome domains of pain, function, disability, and medication use. These effects persisted to 6-month follow-up.The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT02095197).