RESUMEN
Background and purpose Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have been administered clinically since 1988. They are remarkably well tolerated by children and result in dose-dependent tissue deposition, even in patients with normal renal function. No adverse effects of gadolinium deposition in patients with normal renal function have been established. Given the uncertain effects of gadolinium deposition, we sought to analyze gadolinium use in the imaging follow-up of nonenhancing primary brain neoplasms in children. Materials and methods This retrospective, institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study evaluated pediatric patients who received GBCA in the routine evaluation of brain neoplasms. This special subset included 30 patients (<18 years old) with initially nonenhancing primary intracranial neoplasms who received treatment and follow-up at our institution. Patient data included sex, age from diagnosis to most recent imaging follow-up, number of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up exams, and histopathology from a biopsy or resection. Results The group had an expected variety of tumors, including low-grade astrocytomas, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors, oligodendrogliomas, and teratomas. Half of our patients had tumors of unknown histopathology that were not biopsied or resected. The median age at diagnosis was 8.9 years, the median of four follow-up MRIs per patient, and the median follow-up time of four years. Only one of the 30 patients developed an enhancing focus on follow-up MRI that remained stable and asymptomatic over two years and did not require surgical intervention. Conclusion Judicious use of GBCA in children, especially when numerous exams over many years are anticipated, is advised given the data regarding soft-tissue deposition. Preliminary results suggest that it may be feasible to omit GBCA from routine follow-ups of initially nonenhancing brain neoplasms.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate complications and treatment failure rates of percutaneous renal cryoablation (PRC) for small renal masses under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation (LACS), to assess the safety and effectiveness of this approach, as PRC is typically performed under general anaesthesia (GA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed PRC under LACS from 2003 to 2017. We analysed perioperative parameters between patients who successfully underwent PRC under LACS and patients with post-procedural complications or treatment failure (renal mass enhancement after successful intraoperative tumour ablation). Two-sided non-parametric and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare uncomplicated or disease-free PRC with the complication or treatment failure group, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 100 PRCs under LACS were performed during the study period. Of these patients, six patients had at least one postoperative complication (6%), and treatment failure was diagnosed in nine patients (9%) after PRC [mean (SD) follow-up of 42.7 (26.6) months]. The procedural failure rate was 1%. No ablations were converted to GA. The mean tumour size was smaller in patients who had no complications during PRC compared to those who did, at a mean (SD) of 2.2 (0.6) cm vs 3.0 (1.0) cm (P = 0.039). The use of more intraoperative probes during the PRC was also associated with complications, at a mean (SD) 3.0 (1.4) vs 1.8 (0.8) (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: PRC under LACS is an effective and safe procedural approach for managing small renal masses with low complication, treatment failure, and procedural failure rates. Larger renal masses and intraoperative use of multiple probes is associated with an increased risk of PRC complications. ABBREVIATIONS: BMI: body mass index; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; GA: general anaesthesia; LACS: local anaesthesia and conscious sedation; PRC: percutaneous renal cryoablation; R.E.N.A.L.: Radius, Exophytic/Endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/Posterior, Location.
RESUMEN
Anastomosing hemangiomas are rare variants of vascular tumors found in adrenal, hepatic, and gastrointestinal tissue. Frequently, renal anastomosing hemangiomas are misdiagnosed on computed tomography (CT) as kidney cancers, resulting in unnecessary workups and detrimental treatments. We present a rare case of bilateral renal and adrenal anastomosing hemangioma found incidentally on renal biopsy. Patient is a 39 year-old African American male on hemodialysis with a history of end-stage renal disease secondary to lupus who presented with acute pericarditis and worsening renal insufficiency.