RESUMEN
Evidence suggests that chronic ankle instability (CAI) is not merely a peripheral musculoskeletal injury but should be recognized as a neurophysiological dysfunction. This reflects a paradigm shift from focusing on peripheral structural changes to emphasizing the central nervous system. However, changes in cortical activity during functional activities remain poorly understood. Thus, this study aimed to compare preparatory brain activity during gait initiation (GI) through movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) in individuals with CAI and healthy subjects. The proactive components of MRCPs, including contingent negative variation (CNV) and event-related desynchronization (ERD), were measured using electroencephalography. The primary outcomes were late CNV amplitude, CNV peak amplitude, CNV peak time, and alpha/beta ERD. The results indicated that the late CNV amplitude was significantly lower in the CAI group compared to the healthy group at the Fz and Cz electrodes (P < 0.001). The CAI group also demonstrated lower CNV peak amplitude at the Fz, Cz, and Pz electrodes (P < 0.0025). Additionally, in the CAI group, signals peaked earlier at the Cz electrode (P = 0.002). Furthermore, alpha ERD at Pz was significantly lower in the CAI group than in the healthy group (P = 0.003), suggesting diminished preparatory brain activity during GI in CAI subjects. Recognizing CAI as a condition involving both peripheral and central dysfunctions highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment and rehabilitation. This approach should target brain activity in addition to peripheral structures, potentially leading to improved long-term outcomes for patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with balance training could integrate central and peripheral neural mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate the effects of concurrent balance training and tDCS over the supplementary motor area (SMA) on anticipatory postural adjustments during gait initiation (GI) in persons with chronic ankle instability (CAI). HYPOTHESIS: Balance training will increase the center of pressure (COP) velocity and displacement during GI phases in all participants, and those receiving real tDCS will show greater increases. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: A total of 32 subjects were allocated to 2 groups: (1) intervention (balance training plus real tDCS) and (2) control (balance training plus sham tDCS). Outcome measures were COP-related parameters (displacement and velocity) during phases of GI (anticipatory, weight transition, and locomotor). RESULTS: The results showed that, in the anticipatory phase, the anteroposterior displacement of the COP was increased significantly at posttest relative to pretest across both groups, F(1,30) = 5.733, P = 0.02. In addition, both groups revealed an increase in the mediolateral COP velocity at posttest, F(1,30) = 10.523, P < 0.01. In the weight transition phase, both groups had higher mediolateral COP velocity at posttest, F(1,30) = 30.636, P < 0.01. In the locomotor phase, in both groups, the anteroposterior COP velocity was increased significantly at posttest compared with pretest, F(1,30) = 5.883, P = 0.02. CONCLUSION: Both groups demonstrated improvements in the anticipatory and execution phases of GI. Since no between-group difference was found, it can be interpreted that the anodal tDCS applied over the SMA has no added value over sham stimulation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Balance training is beneficial for persons with CAI and can improve the anticipation and execution phases of GI without the aid of brain stimulation.