Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(6): 520-7, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26043904

RESUMEN

The development of techniques for endoscopic resection has provided new strategies for radical conservative treatment of superficial esophageal neoplasms, even those that are circumferential, such as Barrett's neoplasia. However, it is necessary to prevent the formation of scar tissue that can be responsible for esophageal strictures following circumferential resection. Preliminary data have suggested the possible efficacy of a hemostatic powder in the promotion of wound healing. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of Hemospray (Cook Medical) in a swine model of post-endoscopic esophageal stricture. Our prospective controlled study included 21 pigs. A 6-cm circumferential submucosal dissection of the esophagus (CESD) was performed in each pig. Group 1 (n = 11) only underwent CESD and Group 2 (n = 10) had repeated Hemospray applications after CESD. Clinical, endoscopic, and radiological monitoring were performed, blood levels of four inflammatory or pro-fibrotic cytokines were assessed, and histological analysis was performed. Median esophageal diameter was greater in the group treated with Hemospray (2 mm [1-3] vs. 3 mm [2-4], P = 0.01), and the rate of symptomatic esophageal stricture was 100% and 60% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.09). The thicknesses of esophageal fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltrate were significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.002 and 0.0003, respectively). The length of the neoepithelium was greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.0004). Transforming growth factor-ß levels were significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.01). The application of Hemospray after esophageal CESD reduces scar tissue formation and promotes reepithelialization, and therefore is a promising therapeutic approach in the prevention of post-endoscopic esophageal stricture.


Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Mucosa Esofágica/efectos de los fármacos , Estenosis Esofágica/prevención & control , Esofagoscopía , Hemostáticos/farmacología , Minerales/farmacología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Repitelización/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Cicatriz/prevención & control , Mucosa Esofágica/cirugía , Esófago/efectos de los fármacos , Esófago/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Porcinos
2.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 42(1): 20-39, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25982288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extensive endoscopic resections for the treatment of early oesophageal neoplasia can result in fibro-inflammatory strictures that require repeated interventions, which significantly alter the patients' quality of life. AIMS: To review current evidence about the prevention of oesophageal strictures following endoscopic resections. METHODS: Systematic search of PubMed and Embase from inception to March 2015 using appropriate keywords. All original publications in English were included, and articles on the treatment of oesophageal stricture were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 461 hits, 62 studies were included in the analysis. Among the wound-protective strategies, polyglycolic acid sheets showed the most convincing evidence with a 37.5% stricture rate and excellent safety. Regenerative medicine, using cell sheets of autologous keratinocytes, resulted in a 25% stricture rate, although with cost and availability concerns. Among anti-proliferative treatment modalities, steroid treatment, either endoscopically injected triamcinolone in the resection wound or orally administered prednisolone, proved effective with an overall stricture rate of 13.5%, with safety concerns regarding late oesophageal perforations and infectious morbidity. Among mechanical treatment options, poorly effective and high-risk preventive balloon dilation tend to be replaced by prophylactic covered stent, with 18-28% stricture rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although oral or locally injected steroids are promising options, no currently available technique is sufficiently efficient and devoid of significant safety concerns to recommend its routine use for the prevention of strictures after extensive endoscopic resection. Improving our knowledge in the mechanisms of oesophageal wound healing will guide the development of novel methods for stricture prevention.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Esofágica/prevención & control , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Perforación del Esófago/epidemiología , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA