RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The practise of paramedicine can be highly stressful particularly where urgent lifesaving decisions need to be made. Traditionally, educators have adopted the approach of placing students in simulated stressful situations as a way of learning to cope with these challenges. It is unclear from the literature whether traditional stress inoculation enhances or hinders learning. This scoping review aims to identify and examine both the peer-reviewed and grey literature reporting physiological stress responses to high-acuity scenarios in paramedicine and cognate healthcare disciplines. METHODS: Adhering strictly to JBI Evidence Synthesis Manual for conducting a scoping review, medical subject headings and areas, keywords and all other possible index terms were searched across EBSCOhost (Medline, CINAHL and APA PsycInfo), Scopus and, PubMed. English language articles both published (peer-reviewed academic papers, reports and conference proceedings) and unpublished (grey literature, Google Scholar reports) were included, and publications citing retrieved articles were also checked. RESULTS: Searches performed across five electronic databases identified 52 articles where abstracts indicated potential inclusion. From this, 22 articles which reported physiological or psychophysiological responses to stressful scenario-based education were included. CONCLUSION: This review identified that an acceptable level of stress during simulation can be beneficial, however a point can be exceeded where stress becomes a hinderance to learning resulting in underperformance. By identifying strategies to moderate the impact of acute stress, educators of paramedic and other healthcare students can utilise high-acuity clinical scenarios to their andragogical armamentarium which has the potential to improve real-world clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Estrés Psicológico , Humanos , Entrenamiento Simulado , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current guidelines of the American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend that when right ventricular myocardial infarction (RVMI) is present patients are not administered nitrates, due to the risk that decreasing preload in the setting of already compromised right ventricular ejection fraction may reduce cardiac output and precipitate hypotension. The cohort study (n=40) underlying this recommendation was recently challenged by new studies suitable for meta-analysis (cumulatively, n=1050), suggesting that this topic merits systematic review. METHODS: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO and published in Evidence Synthesis. Six databases were systematically searched in May 2022: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, Cochrane CENTRAL Register, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Two investigators independently assessed for quality and bias and extracted data using Joanna Briggs Institute tools and methods. Risk ratios and 95% CIs were calculated, and meta-analysis performed using the random effects inverse variance method. RESULTS: Five studies (n=1113) were suitable. Outcomes included haemodynamics, GCS, syncope, arrest and death. Arrest and death did not occur in the RVMI group. Meta-analysis was possible for sublingual nitroglycerin 400 µg (2 studies, n=1050) and found no statistically significant difference in relative risk to combined inferior and RVMI at 1.31 (95% CI 0.81 to 2.12, p=0.27), with an absolute effect of 3 additional adverse events per 100 treatments. Results remained robust under sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that the AHA and ESC contraindications are not supported by evidence. Key limitations include all studies having concomitant inferior and RVMI, not evaluating beneficial effects and very low certainty of evidence. As adverse events are transient and easily managed, nitrates are a reasonable treatment modality to consider during RVMI on current evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020172839.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Nitratos , Humanos , Nitratos/efectos adversos , Volumen Sistólico , Estudios de Cohortes , Función Ventricular DerechaRESUMEN
The physiological impact of transitioning from full-time study to work in occupations that involve high-stress environments and shift work may plausibly impact sleep patterns and quality. There are limited studies focusing on the transition to shift work in graduate paramedics. This study aimed to assess early metabolic markers of health, activity, and sleep quality during the first 5 months of rostered shift work in a cohort of 28 graduate paramedics. Participants were tested for 4-week blocks before starting shift work (baseline), and during their first and fifth month of shift work. In each block, sleep and activity levels were monitored 24 h/day (workdays and nonworking days) using a wrist-worn actigraph. During shift work, the number of sleep episodes increased by 16.7% (p = .02) and self-reporting of poor sleep quality increased by 35.4% (p = .05); however, overall sleep quantity and sleep efficiency did not differ. Sleep metrics recorded during nonwork days were not different to baseline with exception of reduced sleep duration recorded the night before returning to work (5.99 ± 1.66 hours Month 1; 5.72 ± 1.06 hours Month 5). Sedentary behavior increased by 4.8% across the study, attributable to a significant decline in light exercise (p = .05). No changes were recorded in vigorous physical activity, average steps recorded per day, fasting blood glucose levels, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, weight, or waist circumference. These results warrant further large-scale and longitudinal studies to gauge any physiological implications for ongoing paramedic health.