RESUMEN
Aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with a reduction in the risk of developing adenomas and colorectal cancer. The available scientific evidence justifies the need for more studies that evaluate the protective effect of aspirin and other NSAIDs as a preventive measure against cancer of the colon; define the minimum efficient dosage; the age at which to begin treatment; the most convenient duration of the latter; and the sub-populations for which the benefits of chemoprophylaxis outweigh possible adverse effects.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Humanos , Prevención PrimariaRESUMEN
La aspirina y otros antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) se han asociado a una reducción en el riesgo de desarrollar adenomas y cáncer colorrectal. Con la evidencia científica disponible, queda justificada la necesidad de más estudios que evalúen el efecto protector de la aspirina u otros AINE como medida preventiva del cáncer de colon, que definan la dosis mínima eficaz, la edad a la que comenzar el tratamiento, la duración más conveniente del mismo y las subpoblaciones para las que los beneficios de la quimioprofilaxis superan los posibles efectos adversos(AU)
Aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with a reduction in the risk of developing adenomas and colorectal cancer. The available scientific evidence justifies the need for more studies that evaluate the protective effect of aspirin and other NSAIDs as a preventive measure against cancer of the colon; define the minimum efficient dosage; the age at which to begin treatment; the most convenient duration of the latter; and the sub-populations for which the benefits of chemoprophylaxis outweigh possible adverse effects(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Aspirina/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Prevención de EnfermedadesRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Pronóstico , Cirugía Colorrectal/tendencias , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Colon/patología , Colon/fisiología , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Enfermedades del Colon/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Objetivo: Analizar la relación entre la presencia de lesiones sincrónicas en el cáncer colo-rectal y su pronóstico. Método: Revisamos 369 cánceres colo-rectales resecados. Comparamos el porcentaje de cirugía aparentemente curativa, la progresión y recidiva tumoral, aparición posterior de cáncer extra-colónico y mortalidad entre los cánceres sincrónicos y el resto. Analizamos los cánceres con adenomas sincrónicos frente al resto de casos. Repetimos el estudio estratificando los casos según su estadio pTNM: estadios 0-I-II versus III-IV. Resultados: Registramos un 7,6% de cánceres sincrónicos y un 54,7% de adenomas sincrónicos. El seguimiento entre los grupos con y sin cáncer sincrónico fue de 70,8 ± 22,9 vs 67,2 ± 24,5 meses (p = 0,55). Los cánceres sincrónicos mostraron mayor mortalidad: 35,7% vs. 14,4%:p = 0,006; OR = 3,31 (1,33-8,13), mayor progresión tumoral: 39,3 vs.19,1%: p = 0,011; OR = 2,75 (1,14-6,56) y mayor recidiva: 10,7 vs.3,5%: p = 0,096. Al estratificar según el estadio, los pacientes con estadio 0-I-II y cáncer sincrónico mantuvieron peor pronóstico: mortalidad =27,7 vs. 8,1% p = 0,019; OR = 4,45 (1,20-15,10), progresión tumoral =27,8 vs. 8,5% p = 0,02; OR = 4,12 (1,14-14,19), cáncer extra-colónico =16,7 vs. 6,4% p = 0,095. No encontramos diferencias entre los casos con y sin adenomas sincrónicos. Conclusiones: Los cánceres sincrónicos muestran peor pronóstico tras la resección, con mayor tasa de progresión tumoral y mortalidad. Esta diferencia se centra en los casos diagnosticados en estadios 0-I-II, perdiéndose en los estadios III-IV. En nuestra serie, la presencia de adenomas sincrónicos no influye en el pronóstico
Aim: To analyze the relationship between synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal cancer and their prognostic value. Patients and methods: We have retrospectively reviewed 369 patients with resected colorectal cancer. We compared the rate of apparently curative surgery, progression and tumoral relapse, development of extracolonic cancer and mortality between patients with and without synchronous cancer. Afterwards, we analyzed the same parameters incolorectal cancer with and without synchronous adenomas. Finally, were peated the analysis after stratification of cancers in 2 groups accordingto pTNM staging: 0-I-II stage vs III-IV. Results: We found synchronous adenomas in 54.7% of our patients and synchronous cancers in 7.6%. Follow-up period of groups with and without synchronous lesions were: 70.8 ± 22.9 and 67.2 ± 24.5 months (p= 0.55) respectivelly. Synchronous cancers showed higher mortality: 35.7 vs. 14.4%: p = 0.006; OR = 3.31 (1.33-8.13), higher tumoral progression: 39.3 vs. 19.1%: p = 0.011; OR = 2.75 (1.14-6.56) and higher relapse rate: 10.7 vs. 3.5%: p = 0.096. Stratifying according to stage, patients with stage 0-I-II and synchronous cancer showed worse prognosis:mortality = 27.7 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.019; OR = 4.45 (1.2-15.1), tumoral progression = 27.8 vs. 8.5%, p = 0.02; OR = 4.12 (1.14-14.19), and extracolonic cancer = 16.7 vs. 6.4% p = 0.095. There were no statistical differences between cases with and without synchronous adenomas. Conclusions: Synchronous cancers showed worse prognosis after resection, with higher rate of tumoral progression and mortality. This difference is focused on the cases diagnosed in stage 0-I-II, not being found inIII-IV. The presence of synchronous adenomas doesnt influence prognosis
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIM: To analyze the relationship between synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal cancer and their prognostic value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have retrospectively reviewed 369 patients with resected colorectal cancer. We compared the rate of apparently curative surgery, progression and tumoral relapse, development of extracolonic cancer and mortality between patients with and without synchronous cancer. Afterwards, we analyzed the same parameters in colorectal cancer with and without synchronous adenomas. Finally, we repeated the analysis after stratification of cancers in 2 groups according to pTNM staging: 0-I-II stage vs III-IV. RESULTS: We found synchronous adenomas in 54.7% of our patients and synchronous cancers in 7.6%. Follow-up period of groups with and without synchronous lesions were: 70.8 +/- 22.9 and 67.2 +/- 24.5 months (p = 0.55) respectively. Synchronous cancers showed higher mortality: 35.7 vs. 14.4%: p = 0.006; OR = 3.31 (1.33-8.13), higher tumoral progression : 39.3 vs. 19.1%: p = 0.011; OR = 2.75 (1.14-6.56) and higher relapse rate: 10.7 vs. 3.5%: p = 0.096. Stratifying according to stage, patients with stage 0-I-II and synchronous cancer showed worse prognosis: mortality = 27.7 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.019; OR = 4.45 (1.2-15.1), tumoral progression = 27.8 vs. 8.5%, p = 0.02; OR = 4.12 (1.14-14.19), and extracolonic cancer = 16.7 vs. 6.4% p = 0.095. There were no statistical differences between cases with and without synchronous adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous cancers showed worse prognosis after resection, with higher rate of tumoral progression and mortality. This difference is focused on the cases diagnosed in stage 0-I-II, not being found in III-IV. The presence of synchronous adenomas doesn't influence prognosis.