RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in patients with multiple vessel disease with involvement of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). METHODS: 230 patients with multiple vessel disease and severe stenosis of the proximal LAD (113 with PCI, 117 with CABG). They were a cohort of patients from the randomised ERACI (Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease) II study. RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences in 30 day major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat procedures) between the strategies (PCI 2.7% v CABG 7.6%, p = 0.18). There were no significant differences in survival (PCI 96.4% v CABG 95%, p = 0.98) and survival with freedom from myocardial infarction (PCI 92% v CABG 89%, p = 0.94) at 41.5 (6) months' follow up. However, freedom from new revascularisation procedures (CABG 96.6% v PCI 73%, p = 0.0002) and frequency of angina (CABG 9.4% v PCI 22%, p = 0.025) were superior in the CABG group. CONCLUSION: Patients with multivessel disease and significant disease of the proximal LAD randomly assigned in the ERACI II trial to PCI or CABG had similar survival and survival with freedom from myocardial infarction at long term follow up. Repeat revascularisation procedures were higher in the PCI group.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Estenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization (PTCR) employing stent implantation to conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in symptomatic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Previous randomized studies comparing balloon angioplasty versus CABG have demonstrated equivalent safety results. However, CABG was associated with significantly fewer repeat revascularization procedures. METHODS: A total of 2,759 patients with coronary artery disease were screened at seven clinical sites, and 450 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either PTCR (225 patients) or CABG (225 patients). Only patients with multivessel disease and indication for revascularization were enrolled. RESULTS: Both groups had similar clinical demographics: unstable angina in 92%; 38% were older than 65 years, and 23% had a history of peripheral vascular disease. During the first 30 days, PTCR patients had lower major adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization procedures and stroke) compared with CABG patients (3.6% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.002). Death occurred in 0.9% of PTCR patients versus 5.7% in CABG patients, p < 0.013, and Q myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 0.9% PTCR versus 5.7% of CABG patients, p < 0.013. At follow-up (mean 18.5 +/- 6.4 months), survival was 96.9% in PTCR versus 92.5% in CABG, p < 0.017. Freedom from MI was also better in PTCR compared to CABG patients (97.7% vs. 93.4%, p < 0.017). Requirements for new revascularization procedures were higher in PTCR than in CABG patients (16.8% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In this selected high-risk group of patients with multivessel disease, PTCR with stent implantation showed better survival and freedom from MI than did conventional surgery. Repeat revascularization procedures were higher in the PTCR group.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Argentina , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. METHODS: To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n=57) or to optimal PTCA (n=59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). RESULTS: Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63+/-0.59 vs. 0.26+/-0.44, respectively; p=0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32< or =0.3 vs. 1.24+/-0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p=NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p=NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p=NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p=NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/economía , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/normas , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Coronaria/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/economía , Stents/normas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
One hundred four patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction < 24 hours after onset were randomized to 2 groups: group I (n = 52) was treated with balloon angioplasty followed electively with Gianturco Roubin II stents, and group II was treated with conventional balloon angioplasty alone (n = 52). All lesions were suitable for stenting. Baseline clinical, demographic, and angiographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Procedural success was defined as no laboratory death or emergent coronary bypass, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial 2 or 3 flow after the procedure in a culprit vessel, and a residual stenosis < or = 30% for coronary angioplasty and < 20% for stent. Procedural success was 98% in group I versus 94.2% in group II, p = NS. Thirteen patients in group II (25%) had bailout stenting during the initial procedure. Adverse in-hospital events including either death, nonelective coronary bypass, recurrent ischemia, and reinfarction occurred in 3.8% in group I versus 19.2% in group II, p = 0.03. Repeat angiography performed routinely before hospital discharge revealed TIMI 3 flow in the infarct-related artery in 98% in group I versus 83% in group II, p < 0.03. At late follow-up, event-free survival was significantly better in the stent (83%) than in the coronary angioplasty (65%) group (p = 0.002). The procedural in-hospital and late outcomes of this randomized study demonstrate that balloon angioplasty followed electively by coronary stents can be used as the primary modality for patients undergoing coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction, increasing TIMI 3 flow, reducing in-hospital adverse events, and improving late outcome compared with balloon angioplasty alone.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Radiografía , Recurrencia , Retratamiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Although coronary stenting has been useful in the treatment of patients with suboptimal results, abrupt closure, and threatening occlusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), its use in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is controversial because of the presence of intracoronary thrombus. In this study intracoronary stenting was used to treat suboptimal results and complications in 30 patients (35 lesions) undergoing PTCA during AMI. There were 28 men and 2 women, mean age 58 +/- 12 years. Thirteen patients (43%) had undergone rescue PTCA because of unsuccessful thrombolysis. Four patients had Killip's grade IV, 5 Killip's grade III, and 21 Killip's grade < or = 2 heart failure. Stents were placed in the 35 lesions because of suboptimal result (n = 19), early loss (n = 9), abrupt closure (n = 2), and coronary dissection with threatening occlusion (n = 5). All stents were deployed successfully. In-hospital complications included 1 in-hospital death (3.0%); no patient required emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery. One patient (3.0%) developed abrupt closure and was successfully treated with PTCA and intracoronary thrombolysis. Vascular complications requiring blood transfusion developed in 3 of 30 patients (10%). At 11.8 months (range 4 to 24) follow-up, there were no deaths or myocardial infarction. One patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. The remaining patients were free of angina at follow-up. Thus, intracoronary stents can be used successfully to treat both suboptimal results and complications occurring in patients undergoing PTCA during AMI.