RESUMEN
Background: As the demand for digital dentistry constantly increases, digital devices are gradually replacing conventional methods of recording occlusal contacts. The study aimed to assess the inter-rater reliability of occlusal contact point detection using 40 µm articulating paper, Medit i700, and OccluSense and to compare the distribution of occlusal contacts using the articulating paper and intraoral scanner. Material and Methods: The study included 25 participants aged 20 to 30 (13 women and 12 men). Photographs of contact points were taken and marked in maximum intercuspal position (MIP), in protrusive and laterotrusive movements, on working and non-working sides using 40 µm articulating paper and digital devices. The Cohen's Kappa coefficient assessed the inter-rater reliability. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dependent groups, articulating paper, and Medit i700. Results: The Cohen's Kappa index showed that almost perfect agreement was achieved with 40 µm articulating paper. Compared to Medit i700, the 40 µm articulating paper showed an increased mean number of contacts per tooth, except for the third molars. Conclusions: The 40 µm articulating paper has detected more overall contacts than the digital devices, particularly in the posterior areas. An ideal method for registering occlusal contacts has not been established yet.
RESUMEN
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Artificial intelligence has been used to enhance the digitalized workflow, especially when undergoing complex oral rehabilitations. However, the reliability of real-time jaw motion registration devices is unclear, and no standard measurement method of the sagittal condylar inclination (SCI) and Bennett angle (BA) has been established. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare and evaluate the reliability of the SCI and BA values recorded by using 2 different digital devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 17 participants, aged between 20 and 30 years (10 women and 7 men) were included in the study. For each participant, the Cadiax Compact 2 and MODJAW tracking devices were used to measure the SCI and BA values at 3 mm and 5 mm of condylar displacement during 3 separate recording sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability of the recordings. Comparisons between the devices were performed with the Wilcoxson rank-sum test (α=.05). The Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the quantitative agreement between the 2 devices. RESULTS: All ICC intrarater reliability values for Cadiax and MODJAW were higher than 0.90. Both at 3 and 5 mm, the SCI measurements were higher for MODJAW registrations than for those recorded by Cadiax. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the SCI values were higher for MODJAW than for Cadiax by 5.9 (95% CI 3.9 to 8.2) and that the BA differences between the MODJAW and the Cadiax were not consistent with the measured value. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent reliability was found with the MODJAW and Cadiax recordings. The SCI and BA values for MODJAW measurements were higher at 3 mm and 5 mm than those acquired with Cadiax. MODJAW showed higher values than Cadiax, and the discrepancies were more pronounced for 3 mm than for 5 mm of condylar displacement, highlighting the need for precision in measurements at lower ranges of motion.