Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Fertil Steril ; 107(2): 483-493, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27887716

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report findings from 10 years of requests from adults eligible to obtain their open-identity sperm donor's information. DESIGN: Analysis of archived family and donor data. Semistructured interviews at information releases. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 85 DI adults requesting 43 donor identities; program data on 256 DI families. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We identified [1] demographic predictors of requesting donor identities, [2] information release timing and length, and [3] request motives. RESULT(S): Just >35% of eligible DI adults requested their donor's identity. Adults ranged from 18-27 years, requesting at median age 18 years. More women than men requested. Proportionally fewer adults requested when they had heterosexual-couple parents, and proportionally more when they had one rather than two parents. In interviews, the common theme was wanting to know more about the donor, especially about shared characteristics. Most adults planned to contact their donor. More than 94% of adults had donors who were open to contact; adults expressed modest expectations about this contact. CONCLUSION(S): In 2001, the first adults became eligible to obtain their open-identity sperm donor's information. Ten years of identity requests at one program indicates that information about one's donor is important to a significant proportion of these DI adults. Most requested their donor's identity soon after becoming eligible, suggesting some urgency to wanting the information. Interview data highlighted the role of donor information in helping adults better understand themselves and their ancestry. Findings hold important implications for practice and policy.


Asunto(s)
Hijos Adultos/psicología , Difusión de la Información , Donadores Vivos/psicología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/psicología , Espermatozoides , Donantes de Tejidos/psicología , Revelación de la Verdad , Donante no Emparentado/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , California , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Herencia , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Motivación , Linaje , Factores Sexuales , Bancos de Esperma , Adulto Joven
3.
Fertil Steril ; 104(3): 507-12, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26235569

RESUMEN

Mental health professionals have engaged in mandatory pretreatment counseling and assessment of patients seeking treatment at IVF programs in the United States since the 1980s. At present, most recipient patients undergoing IVF with egg or embryo donation in the United States are required to meet with a mental health professional for one pretreatment session. Mandatory counseling of gamete recipients is fraught with ethical questions for the mental health professional. Attention to issues of autonomy, confidentiality, role clarity, along with self-evaluation and openness with the patient can help lessen the impact of these ethical challenges.


Asunto(s)
Consejo/ética , Selección de Donante/ética , Infertilidad/terapia , Programas Obligatorios/ética , Donación de Oocito/ética , Padres/psicología , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/ética , Femenino , Fertilidad , Humanos , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Infertilidad/psicología , Masculino , Donación de Oocito/psicología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/ética , Seguridad del Paciente , Autonomía Personal , Embarazo , Autonomía Profesional , Donantes de Tejidos/ética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA