Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
2.
J Fam Pract ; 49(7): 614-21, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10923571

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many case-finding instruments are available to help primary care physicians (PCPs) diagnose depression, but they are not widely used. Physicians often consider these instruments too time consuming or feel they do not provide sufficient diagnostic information. Our study examined the validity and utility of the Quick PsychoDiagnostics (QPD) Panel, an automated mental health test designed to meet the special needs of PCPs. The test screens for 9 common psychiatric disorders and requires no physician time to administer or score. METHODS: We evaluated criterion validity relative to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), and evaluated convergent validity by correlating QPD Panel scores with established mental health measures. Sensitivity to change was examined by readministering the test to patients pretreatment and posttreatment. Utility was evaluated through physician and patient satisfaction surveys. RESULTS: For major depression, sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 96%, respectively. For other disorders, sensitivities ranged from 69% to 98%, and specificities ranged from 90% to 97%. The depression severity score correlated highly with the Beck, Hamilton, Zung, and CES-D depression scales, and the anxiety score correlated highly with the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the anxiety subscale of the Symptom Checklist 90 (Ps <.001). The test was sensitive to change. All PCPs agreed or strongly agreed that the QPD Panel "is convenient and easy to use," "can be used immediately by any physician," and "helps provide better patient care." Patients also rated the test favorably. CONCLUSIONS: The QPD Panel is a valid mental health assessment tool that can diagnose a range of common psychiatric disorders and is practical for routine use in primary care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos
3.
Psychiatr Q ; 71(1): 31-45, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10736815

RESUMEN

Anxiety disorders are common, yet under diagnosed, in primary care settings. Many patients with anxiety and other psychiatric disorders do not seek care in mental health care settings. An integrated primary care/mental health model offers one approach to improving outcomes for patients with anxiety disorders. This model has been researched for the treatment of depression with positive results but has not been well studied for the treatment of anxiety disorders. We describe the results of care for a cohort of adult patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and clinically significant anxiety secondary to Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) treated in an integrated model. Compared to a matched cohort of adults treated in a primary care setting with usual care, the intervention cohort experienced significantly improved reduction in symptoms of anxiety at 6 months. The intervention cohort also was significantly more satisfied with care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Lancet ; 354(9193): 1873-4, 1999 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10584726

RESUMEN

We examined data from two large colorectal chemoprevention trials for possible associations of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas with subsequent development of these lesions. Hyperplastic polyps do not predict metachronous adenomas.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/epidemiología , Pólipos Adenomatosos/epidemiología , Pólipos del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Pólipos Adenomatosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Pólipos del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Masculino , Riesgo
6.
J Fam Pract ; 48(3): 222-7, 1999 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10086767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary care providers are aware of the importance of identifying depression and anxiety in their patients. The diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), however, is less of a priority. METHODS: Primary care physicians and nurse practitioners in an outpatient facility of a large health maintenance organization administered a psychiatric screening questionnaire to patients whom they suspected had depression or anxiety. Patients with positive results were referred for immediate consultation with a clinical psychologist. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen (38.6%) of the 296 patients referred for consultation met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) diagnostic criteria for PTSD. The most frequent traumas associated with PTSD were adult domestic violence and childhood abuse. Patients with a diagnosis of PTSD were frequent users of medical services in the 12 months before diagnosis. The majority of patients sought treatment in primary care settings, not mental health settings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PTSD often visit outpatient primary care settings. Medical providers may identify symptoms of depression or anxiety but may not recognize PTSD because of the high degree of overlap between these conditions, and the lack of familiarity with PTSD diagnostic criteria. We provide screening questions that may help physicians detect PTSD in their practices.


Asunto(s)
Atención Primaria de Salud , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Adulto , Colorado , Femenino , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Anamnesis/métodos , Pruebas Psicológicas , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia
7.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 94(1): 194-9, 1999 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9934755

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Studies of tandem colonoscopies have reported that 15-25% of neoplastic polyps <1 cm in size and 0-6% of larger polyps are overlooked at the time of colonoscopy. We determined the miss rate and "true" 1-yr recurrence of neoplastic polyps in a population of patients reflecting a broad spectrum of different gastroenterology practice settings. METHODS: Patient data from several sources were examined for repeat colonoscopies performed on the same patient within 120 days of each other. Examination pairs were included for analysis if both colonoscopies had good preps and reached the cecum. The miss rate was calculated by two methods: 1) a pooled rate, the total number of polyps on all second examinations divided by the total number on both examinations, and 2) a within-person rate, the average of the individual miss-rates. We estimated a "true" 1-yr recurrence rate by subtracting the proportion of patients with a missed neoplastic polyp from the proportion of patients with a neoplastic polyp found at 1 yr. RESULTS: A total of 76 colonoscopy pairs a mean 47 days apart (range, 1-119 days) were identified from a total of approximately 15,000 examinations and used to calculate the overall miss rates. For the category "all polyps" (neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps), 17% by the pooled method and 11% by the within-person method were missed. The corresponding rates for neoplastic polyps were 12% by the pooled method and 8% by the within-person method. A total of 17% of patients had one or more neoplastic polyps missed on the initial examination. The observed 1-yr recurrence rate was determined from 1,314 colonoscopy pairs performed a mean of 379 days apart and found to be 28% for neoplastic polyps. By comparing this to the proportion of patients with one or more missed neoplastic polyps, we found the true 1-yr recurrence of neoplastic polyps to be 11%. CONCLUSION: There is a significant colonoscopic miss rate for neoplastic polyps and "all polyps" in clinical practice that is comparable to that previously stated in special research settings. The within-person rate more accurately reflects the true colorectal polyp miss rate for any given colonoscopic exam than does the pooled rate. The difference between the observed 1-yr recurrence rate and the proportion of patients with a missed polyp represents the true 1-yr recurrence of neoplastic polyps.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos Adenomatosos/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Pólipos Adenomatosos/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
8.
Postgrad Med ; 103(5): 77-84, 1998 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9590987

RESUMEN

The exact cause of inflammatory bowel disease remains undiscovered, but its destructive nature is clearly recognized. In this article, the authors summarize what is known about the pathogenesis and epidemiology of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and how to distinguish between the two, both clinically and pathologically. They also describe disorders that may mimic inflammatory bowel disease. In part 2 of this article, beginning on page 86, the authors discuss some of the therapeutic options that are the commonly used as well as some that are investigational but show promise for patients with this chronic and relapsing disease.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/etiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/etiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/inmunología , Enfermedad de Crohn/inmunología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
9.
Postgrad Med ; 103(5): 86-90, 95-7, 101-2, 1998 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9590988

RESUMEN

The exact source of interference with the normal protective immune response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease remains unclear. Infectious causes have been proposed, and the increased incidence among family members indicates genetic predisposition. No matter what the pathogenesis may be, the disease is chronic, recurrent, and destructive in many cases. Conventional therapy with 5-ASAs, corticosteroids, immunomodulating agents, methotrexate, and antibiotics often offers relief. However, adverse effects accompany long-term use of many of these agents, so follow-up is important. Much investigation of alternative methods is under way, and anecdotal as well as published experience suggests benefits in at least some patients. Because of the chronic nature of their condition, patients with inflammatory bowel disease often become quite sophisticated in their understanding of treatment methods. Therefore, they should be told of updates regarding new options for disease control. We recommend that patients be seen periodically by a gastroenterologist who has expertise in inflammatory bowel disease, even when the disease is quiescent. Our experience in observing these patients over time strongly supports use of some of the agents discussed in this article for prophylaxis against flares and chronic inflammation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Apoyo Nutricional , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Remisión Espontánea
10.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 91(5): 885-9, 1996 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8633576

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcome of a cohort of patients over the age of 50 yr with iron deficiency anemia in whom a source was not identified during a prior GI evaluation. METHODS: A cohort of 69 patients (43 men, 26 women) with a mean age of 68 yr (range 50-89 yr) who previously had a negative GI evaluation for documented iron deficiency anemia was followed for an average of 39 months (range 2-89 months). RESULTS: In 49 patients (71%), the iron deficiency anemia resolved. All remained stable during the follow-up period except five patients in whom iron deficiency recurred (from 18 months to 5 yr later). Subsequent GI evaluations were negative, and iron deficiency resolved with iron supplementation in all five patients. In 16 patients (23%), a mild chronic anemia persisted during the follow-up period. None of these patients required transfusions, and 12 of the 16 had concomitant medical illnesses that likely contributed to an anemia of chronic disease. Only four patients (6%) had a persistent anemia severe enough to require intermittent transfusions. However, in three of these patients, the anemia was likely secondary to chronic disease (chronic renal failure in two patients, metastatic carcinoma in one patient). Therefore, only one patient (1%) had consistent iron deficiency anemia severe enough to require intermittent transfusions, which was found to be secondary to duodenal angiodysplasia during a subsequent GI evaluation. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of iron deficiency anemia in older patients after a negative GI evaluation is favorable. The anemia resolves and remains stable in the majority of patients after iron replacement. Subsequent GI evaluations should be reserved for those patients whose anemia is refractory to iron replacement and in whom there are not concomitant medical illnesses contributing to an anemia of chronic disease.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/etiología , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hierro/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA