RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. Clinical trial data suggest early diagnosis and treatment are critical. The purpose of this study was to evaluate neurology appointment wait times for newborn screening identified infants, pediatric cases mirroring SMA symptomatology, and cases in which SMA is suspected by the referring physician. Approaches for triaging and expediting referrals in the US were also explored. METHODS: Cure SMA surveyed healthcare professionals from two cohorts: (1) providers affiliated with SMA care centers and (2) other neurologists, pediatric neurologists, and neuromuscular specialists. Surveys were distributed directly and via Medscape Education, respectively, between July 9, 2020, and August 31, 2020. RESULTS: Three hundred five total responses were obtained (9% from SMA care centers and 91% from the general recruitment sample). Diagnostic journeys were shorter for infants eventually diagnosed with SMA Type 1 if they were referred to SMA care centers versus general sample practices. Appointment wait times for infants exhibiting "hypotonia and motor delays" were significantly shorter at SMA care centers compared to general recruitment practices (p = 0.004). Furthermore, infants with SMA identified through newborn screening were also more likely to be seen sooner if referred to a SMA care center versus a general recruitment site. Lastly, the majority of both cohorts triaged incoming referrals. The average wait time for infants presenting at SMA care centers with "hypotonia and motor delay" was significantly shorter when initial referrals were triaged using a set of "key emergency words" (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Infants directly referred to a SMA care center versus a general sample practice were more likely to experience shorter SMA diagnostic journeys and appointment wait times. Triage guidelines for referrals specific to "hypotonia and motor delay" including use of "key emergency words" may shorten wait times and support early diagnosis and treatment of SMA.

RESUMEN

Background: Telemedicine may increase access to clinical care, particularly for mobility-limited communities such as the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) community. However, much of the information on exposure to and attitudes toward telemedicine in neuromuscular diseases generally and SMA specifically is anecdotal or from focus groups. Gaining greater insight into patient perspectives is important, given telemedicine's potential for expanding access to care and growing use of telemedicine as a result of technology advances and the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Cure SMA collected information on the SMA community's exposure to, comfort with, and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine through its 2021 Community Update Survey. The final analytic sample represented 463 SMA-affected individuals, resident in the United States. Descriptive analyses, correlations, and ordered logit regression models were used to characterize the sample and identify predictors of exposure, comfort, and perceived effectiveness. Data were analyzed on weighted and unweighted bases to account for differences between the survey sample and the SMA community. Stratified analyses were used to compare self-completed surveys with caregiver-completed surveys. Results: 463 individuals answered questions about telemedicine. Approximately four-fifths of these respondents had used telemedicine previously. Factors predicting greater likelihood of prior telemedicine use included male gender, increasing income, having received drug treatment for SMA, history of mental illness, and having non-neutral views regarding comfort and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine. Several factors were also significant predictors of comfort with and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine. Stratified analyses indicated differences between self-completed and caregiver-completed surveys. Conclusion: These results can provide insight into patient experiences with telemedicine and can inform approaches to its use by health care professionals and clinical trial sponsors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Understanding clinical trial experiences can illuminate opportunities to optimize trial design and management, with potential benefits for recruitment and retention. This study sought to better understand clinical trial participant experiences and attitudes within spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and how the evolving treatment landscape and participant characteristics may predict attitudes. METHODS: A survey was developed following a review of published literature and discussions with caregivers of SMA trial participants. This was distributed via email to known trial participants in Cure SMA's database, announcements in Cure SMA's newsletter, and emails to SMA clinical trial principal investigators. RESULTS: Seventy complete surveys reflecting unique clinical trial experiences were included in analysis. Responses revealed positive attitudes about clinical trial management overall. Top motivators for trial participation included clinical benefit, investigational drug access, and the opportunity to help others. Top concerns were safety, whether benefits would justify risks, and concerns about pain accompanying tests. The greatest stressors were fear of pain, adverse event concerns, and challenges managing medical complications of SMA. Top benefits of trial participation were hope for a better future, helping others, and relationships with the study team. In regression analysis, participant gender, age, and race all emerged as significant predictors (p < 0.05) of motivators, concerns, stressors, and benefits, as did respondent type, knowledge about SMA, distance to the trial site, and treatment era. Top recommendations for improving study management all related to receiving more information. CONCLUSION: This research provides new perspective on patient experiences in SMA clinical trials. It underscores the importance of information and efforts to anticipate and accommodate participant needs. These findings may inform study design and interactions with research participants. They may become especially important in supporting recruitment and retention as more treatment options become available.

Clinical trials can be stressful experiences for patients and their caregivers, especially when participants are affected by serious diseases. By understanding trial participants' attitudes and experiences, researchers may be better able to accommodate their interests when designing and conducting research studies. This study sought insight into attitudes and experiences of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) clinical trial participants by surveying people who participated in SMA clinical trials in the USA. The data used in analysis reflected 70 unique clinical trial experiences. Survey responses revealed positive attitudes about clinical trial management overall. Top motivators for trial participation included clinical benefit, investigational drug access, and the opportunity to help others. Top concerns were safety, whether benefits would justify risks, and concerns about pain accompanying tests. The greatest stressors were fear of pain, adverse event concerns, and challenges managing medical complications of SMA. Top benefits of trial participation were hope for a better future, helping others, and relationships with the study team. Whether or not specific motivators, concerns, stressors, and benefits were important was predicted by participant gender, age, and race, as well as respondent type (participant or caregiver), knowledge about SMA, distance to the trial site, and treatment era. Top recommendations for improving study management all related to receiving more information. This research provides new perspective on patient experiences in SMA clinical trials, and may be used to inform future study design and interactions with research participants.

RESUMEN

Health systems and insurers alike are increasingly interested in leveraging mHealth (mobile health) tools to support patient health-related behaviors including medication adherence. However, these tools are not widely used by older patients. This study explores patient preferences for functionality in a smartphone application (app) that supports medication self-management among older adults with multiple chronic conditions. We conducted six discussion groups in Chicago, Miami, and Denver (N = 46). English-speaking older adults (55 and older) who owned smartphones and took five or more prescription medicines were invited to participate. Discussions covered familiarity with and use of current apps and challenges with taking multidrug regimens. Participants reviewed a range of possible mobile app functions and were asked to give feedback regarding the acceptability and desirability of each to support medication management. Very few participants (n = 3) reported current use of a mobile app for medication support, although all were receptive. Challenges to medication use were forgetfulness, fear of adverse events, and managing medication information from multiple sources. Desired features included (1) a list and consolidated schedule of medications, (2) identification and warning of unsafe medication interactions, (3) reminder alerts to take medicine, and (4) the ability record when medications were taken. Features relating to refill ordering, pharmacy information, and comparing costs for medication were not considered to be as important for an app.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review mobile applications currently available to patients to support outpatient medication self-management. METHODS: Three online stores were searched in March 2013 using nine distinct search terms. Applications were selected if they supported general outpatient medication self-management for adults; they were excluded if they focused on only one medication or condition, provided only a medication list or reference, only ordered refills, were written in a non-English language, or were for local pharmacy/hospital patients only. A multi-step review process was utilized by two independent reviewers to identify eligible applications. A standardized form was used to abstract data. User reviews were compiled from a subsample of applications and qualitatively coded to identify common criticisms. RESULTS: 14,893 applications were initially identified. After the multi-step review process, 424 applications were deemed eligible for inclusion by reviewers (κ=0.85). On average, applications were rated 2.8 stars (out of 5) from 107 reviews. Almost all provided medication reminders (91.0%), half enabled patients to create a medication history or log (51.5%), and 22% could email the log to a third party. Few helped patients organize their regimen (6.2%), check for drug interactions (2.8%), or identify pills (4.0%). User reviews (N=1091) from the subsample of 26 applications revealed common criticisms, including technical malfunctions, poor compatibility with certain medications, and absence of desired features. CONCLUSIONS: Hundreds of applications exist in the marketplace to support medication self-management. However, their quality, content, and functionality are highly variable. Research is needed to determine optimal capabilities, evaluate utility, and determine clinical benefit.

Asunto(s)