RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients experiencing any malocclusion, may desire for treatment. However, there is no scientific information orthodontic treatment demand and the knowledge of young adults about orthodontic treatment. The aim of the study was to assess orthodontic treatment demand in young adults from Poland and Chile, their previous orthodontic experience and their knowledge on fixed and aligner orthodontic treatment. METHODS: The target group comprised people aged 18-30. The sample size was estimated as above 400 for each country. The survey was carried out in Polish and Spanish within 3 months and consisted of 25 questions delivered via social media. Comparisons were made between countries, age subgroups and gender. RESULTS: The response rate was 1,99%, what stands for 1092 responses, 670 from Chile and 422 from Poland, respectively. The percentage of young adults who were already treated was 42,9% in Poland and 25,0% in Chile. The ones planning to have orthodontic treatment within a year counted for 11,8% in Poland and 5,3% in Chile. Most young adults who want to be treated (20,6%) rely on doctor's recommendation on type of appliance while 14,7% of all respondents are interested solely in aligners. Most respondents have heard about aligners (58%). Direct provider-to-customer service without a doctor is not acceptable, neither in Poland (85,1%) nor in Chile (64,8%). Most young adults provided incorrect answers referring various aspects of aligner treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In both countries, patients demand to be treated and monitored by the orthodontist. A high percentage of patients want to be treated exclusively with aligners. Direct-to-consumer orthodontics does not seem attractive to patients. Young adults do not have adequate knowledge referring to aligner treatment. Many people want to be treated despite a previous orthodontic treatment.
Asunto(s)
Maloclusión , Aparatos Ortodóncicos Removibles , Ortodoncia , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Maloclusión/terapia , Europa (Continente) , Chile , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adult orthodontic treatment has been increasingly popular, and brackets may need to be bonded to provisional crowns, including CAD/CAM crowns. The use of self-adhesive resin cement or light adhesive paste have been suggested with different surface conditioning protocols to improve the adhesion to CAD/CAM PMMA provisional crowns. Objective To determine and compare the in vitro shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to a provisional prosthetic CAD/CAM material after the use of different adhesive cements and surface conditioning protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty Telio® CAD specimens were manufactured in 12 groups (n=10). Each specimen was bonded to a metal bracket and divided according to adhesive technique (3M™Transbond™ XT Light Cure Paste or 3M™RelyX™ U200) surface treatment (macroretentions) and the use of silane. Half of the specimens were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5°C/55°C water baths). The SBS test was carried out using a shear bond strength tester, and the type of adhesive failure was determined by means of the adhesive remnant index. The data were analysed with the Mann-Whitney test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P<0.001) in SBS were found among the groups. The group with macroretentions, silane, and not thermocycled was the one that obtained the highest average value (17.31±4.89MPa). The lowest average value was the group without macroretentions, without silane, and thermocycled (3.4±3.37MPa). CONCLUSION: The shear bond strength of brackets to provisional prosthetic CAD/CAM materials depended on the type of adhesive, surface treatment, and aging by thermocycling.
Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Adulto , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/métodos , Cementos Dentales , Análisis del Estrés Dental , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Cementos de Resina/química , Resistencia al Corte , Silanos , Propiedades de SuperficieRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate color differences (ΔE) of different fabrication steps performed on a feldspathic ceramic and relative translucency parameter (RTP) after glazing; and to evaluate their effects on the color parameters: L*, a* and b*. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) feldspathic maxillary right central incisor ceramic crowns (Cerec Blocs; 1.4 mm thickness) were fabricated through scanning a model preparation and milling. A total of 20 specimens were used and different parameters were compared with each other for color difference (ΔE): original block, milling, polishing, glazing and try-in cements; RTP was measured after glazing. Color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) were evaluated after each step with a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V) and compared using the CIEDE2000 formula. Statistical analyses were done using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests. RESULTS: The highest ΔE value was observed for Original versus Milling group (4.73) and the lowest for Polishing versus Glazing (0.49). RTP after glazing presented a value of 12.01. L*, a*, and b* parameters were different among groups. Milling group was the one that presented more differences compared to the Original block regarding L*, a*, and b* parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Different fabrication steps resulted in perceptible color differences within themselves, and L*, a*, and b* parameters changed according to each step. All milling specimens presented unacceptable color differences when compared to the other steps, and milling specimens showed all color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) statistically different compared to the Original block. A high RTP value was observed, demonstrating that, at 1.4 mm thickness, the feldspathic ceramic presented high translucency, showing that opacification of substrate might be necessary. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Different fabrication steps can greatly affect the optical properties of the feldspathic ceramic restoration studied and cause a relevant impact when compared to the ceramic block itself. Crowns evaluated right after milling presented the highest color differences. In order to obtain optical properties as close as possible to the original feldspathic ceramic block, either polishing or polishing and glazing needs to be performed.