RESUMEN

Background: Rapid Urease Test (RUT) is a simple, cheap and relatively fast method for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. It is therefore the preferred method used for patients undergoing gastroscopy. Most kits require 24h to give results. The new Ultra-Rapid Urease Test (URUT) kit by Biohit(R) requires less than 1h. Objective: To determine URUT's diagnostic accuracy. Method: Prospective, blind, multi-centre study involving dyspeptic patients. One corpus biopsy and three antral biopsies were obtained during gastroscopy for standard histological analysis, RUT and URUT. The URUT result was checked after 1min, 5min, 30min and 60min and the RUT was checked over the course of 24h. Histology was used as the gold standard test. Results: 144 patients were included, 68% female, with a mean age of 49 years old; 50% were H. pyloripositive. RUT and URUT diagnoses were correct in 85.9% and 90% of the cases, respectively. The mean waiting time for a positive RUT result was 6h. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for RUT were, respectively, 82%, 90%, 89% and 84%. The URUT's results were similar (85%, 94%, 94% and 87%). These figures improved when patients taking PPIs were excluded (RUT: 86%, 91%, 93% and 83%; URUT: 91%, 94%, 96% and 89%). No statistically significant differences were found when comparing RUT and URUT distributions of correct diagnoses (McNemar's Test, p=0.3) but there was a tendency towards better results with the URUT. Conclusion: The URUT is equivalent to (or slightly better than) the traditional RUT in diagnosing H. pyloriinfection, and provides results in less than an hour (AU)

Introducción: El test de la ureasa (TRU) es un método simple, barato y relativamente rápido para el diagnóstico de la infección por Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Por tanto, es el método de elección en pacientes sometidos a gastroscopia. La mayoría de los kits requieren 24 h para obtener un resultado. En nuevo test ultrarrápido de la ureasa (TURU) de Biohit requiere menos de una hora. Objetivo: Determinar la exactitud diagnóstica del TURU. Método: Estudio multicéntrico, prospectivo y ciego, en el que se incluyó a pacientes dispépticos. Se obtuvieron 3 biopsias de antro y una de corpus durante la gastroscopia para análisis histológico estándar, TRU y TURU. El resultado del TURU se comprobó a los 1, 5, 30 y 60 min, mientras que el TRU se evaluó a lo largo de 24 h. La histología se utilizó como patrón oro. Resultados: Se incluyó a 144 pacientes, 68% mujeres, edad media 49 años, el 50% fueron positivos para H. pylori. TRU y TURU diagnosticaron correctamente el 85,9% y 90,0% de los casos, respectivamente. La duración media de espera para un resultado positivo del TRU fue 6 h. La sensibilidad, la especificidad y los valores predictivos negativo y positivo para el TRU fueron, respectivamente, del 82, el 90, el 89 y el 84%. Los resultados del TURU fueron equivalentes (el 85, el 94, el 94 y el 87%). Estos resultados mejoraron al excluir los pacientes que tomaban IBP (TRU: 86, 91, 93 y 83%; TURU: 91, 94, 96 y 89%). La comparación de distribución de diagnósticos correctos entre TRU y TURU no encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas (test de McNemar p=0,3) pero existe una tendencia a mejores resultados con el TURU. Conclusión: El TURU es equivalente (o algo superior) al TRU tradicional en el diagnóstico de la infección por H. pylori y obtiene los resultados en menos de una hora (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid Urease Test (RUT) is a simple, cheap and relatively fast method for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. It is therefore the preferred method used for patients undergoing gastroscopy. Most kits require 24h to give results. The new Ultra-Rapid Urease Test (URUT) kit by Biohit® requires less than 1h. OBJECTIVE: To determine URUT's diagnostic accuracy. METHOD: Prospective, blind, multi-centre study involving dyspeptic patients. One corpus biopsy and three antral biopsies were obtained during gastroscopy for standard histological analysis, RUT and URUT. The URUT result was checked after 1min, 5min, 30min and 60min and the RUT was checked over the course of 24h. Histology was used as the gold standard test. RESULTS: 144 patients were included, 68% female, with a mean age of 49 years old; 50% were H. pylori positive. RUT and URUT diagnoses were correct in 85.9% and 90% of the cases, respectively. The mean waiting time for a positive RUT result was 6h. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for RUT were, respectively, 82%, 90%, 89% and 84%. The URUT's results were similar (85%, 94%, 94% and 87%). These figures improved when patients taking PPIs were excluded (RUT: 86%, 91%, 93% and 83%; URUT: 91%, 94%, 96% and 89%). No statistically significant differences were found when comparing RUT and URUT distributions of correct diagnoses (McNemar's Test, p=0.3) but there was a tendency towards better results with the URUT. CONCLUSION: The URUT is equivalent to (or slightly better than) the traditional RUT in diagnosing H. pylori infection, and provides results in less than an hour.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Angiogenic factors are involved in the physiopathology of several inflammatory diseases and they probably play a role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis (AP). AIMS: To investigate if angiogenic factors are elevated in patients with AP, their relationship with severity and clinical evolution of AP, and their use as prognosis markers of AP. METHODS: A case (25)-control (30) study was carried out. Patients with AP were classified according to severity (using Ranson and Glasgow scores) and according to their clinical evolution (taking into account the development of complications during hospital stay). Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFBB), angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), angiopoietin tyrosine-kinase receptor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF tyrosine-kinase receptor 1, and VEGF tyrosine-kinase receptor 2 were determined at 12 hours and then at 5 days after hospitalization. RESULTS: PDGFBB, Ang-2, angiopoietin tyrosine-kinase receptor, and HGF were significantly higher in cases (P<0.001), and in patients with unfavorable clinical evolution (P<0.001). PDGFBB and HGF were significantly higher in patients with severe AP (P<0.05). To predict unfavorable clinical evolution, PDGFBB, Ang-2, and HGF showed an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: PDGFBB and HGF are related to severity of AP. These factors along with Ang-2 are related to clinical evolution and are useful in predicting the development of several complications during hospital stay. Therefore, these angiogenic factors could be useful as prognosis markers of AP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Antecedentes Las tiopurinas son los inmunosupresores más utilizados para el tratamiento de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.ObjetivosEvaluar la incidencia de eventos adversos (EA) en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal tratados con azatioprina (AZA) o con 6-mercaptopurina (MP) en nuestro hospital, las características de dichos efectos, la distribución de los factores socio-demográficos y los posibles factores predisponentes.MétodosSe incluyeron 377 pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal que fueron diagnosticados hasta 2008 y que recibieron AZA o MP durante el curso de su enfermedad. Se recogieron retrospectivamente datos demográficos, clínicos y de laboratorio sobre su enfermedad e información detallada sobre cualquier EA.ResultadosCincuenta y un pacientes tuvieron algún tipo de EA con AZA o MP (13,5%), y el 11% suspendieron el tratamiento por toxicidad. Se observó una asociación estadísticamente significativa con la enfermedad de Crohn (p=0,008). Hubo mielotoxicidad en 18 pacientes (4,8%) con un tiempo medio de aparición de las anomalías en los análisis de laboratorio de 16 meses. Nueve pacientes presentaron toxicidad hepática secundaria a estos fármacos (2,4%), uno de ellos desarrolló hiperplasia nodular regenerativa e hipertensión portal. Diez pacientes sufrieron pancreatitis aguda (2,7%) con un tiempo medio de aparición de 27 días y una asociación estadísticamente significativa con la enfermedad de Crohn (p=0,03) y tabaquismo (p=0,01). Quince pacientes presentaron intolerancia gastrointestinal (4%), pero cinco pudieron continuar con la medicación administrada en dosis fraccionadas o tras cambiar a MP.ConclusionesLas tiopurinas presentan un porcentaje significativo de EA (13,5%), que si bien suelen ser leves, nos obligan a hacer un seguimiento de todos los casos y, en algunos incluso a suspender el tratamiento(AU)

Background Thiopurine immunomodulators are the most commonly used immunosuppressants in inflammatory bowel disease.AimsTo evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AE) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine (AZA) or 6-mercaptopurine (MP) in our hospital, the features of these effects, the distribution of socio-demographic factors, and the possible predisposing factors.MethodsWe included 377 patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were diagnosed through 2008 and who received AZA or MP during the course of their disease. We collected retrospective demographic, clinical, and laboratory data about their disease and detailed information on any AE.ResultsFifty-one patients had some form of AE with AZA or MP (13.5%) and 11% discontinued therapy because of toxicity. Statistically significant association with Crohn's disease was found (P=.008). Myelotoxicity occurred in 18 patients (4.8%) with a mean time of laboratory abnormalities appearing after 16 months. Nine patients had hepatotoxicity secondary to these drugs (2.4%); one of them developed nodular regenerative hyperplasia and portal hypertension. Ten patients had acute pancreatitis (2.7%) with a mean time occurrence of 27 days and a statistically significant association with Crohn's disease (P=.03) and smoking (P=.01). Fifteen patients had gastrointestinal intolerance (4%) but 5 were able to continue with medication given in divided doses or switching to MP.ConclusionsThiopurine immunomodulators have a significant percentage of AE (13.5%), which, although usually mild, forced us to follow up all cases and sometimes even suspend treatment(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thiopurine immunomodulators are the most commonly used immunosuppressants in inflammatory bowel disease. AIMS: To evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AE) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine (AZA) or 6-mercaptopurine (MP) in our hospital, the features of these effects, the distribution of socio-demographic factors, and the possible predisposing factors. METHODS: We included 377 patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were diagnosed through 2008 and who received AZA or MP during the course of their disease. We collected retrospective demographic, clinical, and laboratory data about their disease and detailed information on any AE. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had some form of AE with AZA or MP (13.5%) and 11% discontinued therapy because of toxicity. Statistically significant association with Crohn's disease was found (P = .008). Myelotoxicity occurred in 18 patients (4.8%) with a mean time of laboratory abnormalities appearing after 16 months. Nine patients had hepatotoxicity secondary to these drugs (2.4%); one of them developed nodular regenerative hyperplasia and portal hypertension. Ten patients had acute pancreatitis (2.7%) with a mean time occurrence of 27 days and a statistically significant association with Crohn's disease (P = .03) and smoking (P = .01). Fifteen patients had gastrointestinal intolerance (4%) but 5 were able to continue with medication given in divided doses or switching to MP. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopurine immunomodulators have a significant percentage of AE (13.5%), which, although usually mild, forced us to follow up all cases and sometimes even suspend treatment.

Asunto(s)