RESUMEN

African swine fever (ASF) and classical swine fever (CSF) are transboundary animal diseases (TADs) of pigs. Much effort and resources are regularly put into preventing these diseases' introduction in free areas. Passive surveillance activities bring the highest chances for the early detection of TAD incursions because they are routinely and widely conducted at farms, and because these activities focus on the time between introduction and when the first sample is sent for diagnostic testing. The authors proposed the implementation of an enhanced passive surveillance (EPS) protocol based on collecting data through participatory surveillance actions using an objective and adaptable scoring system to aid the early detection of ASF or CSF at the farm level. The protocol was applied in two commercial pig farms for ten weeks in the Dominican Republic, which is a CSF- and ASF-infected country. This study was a proof of concept, based on the EPS protocol to aid detection of substantial variations in the risk score triggering testing. One of the followed farms had score variation, which triggered testing of the animals, although the test results were negative. The study enables assessment of some of the weaknesses associated with passive surveillance and provides lessons applicable to the problem. Results demonstrate the potential for overcoming some issues preventing the broad application of EPS protocols and suggest that standardised approaches may contribute to the early detection of CSF and ASF introductions.

La peste porcine africaine (PPA) et la peste porcine classique (PPC) sont des maladies animales transfrontalières touchant les porcs. De nombreux efforts et ressources sont régulièrement alloués pour prévenir l'introduction de ces maladies dans des zones indemnes. Les activités de surveillance passive offrent les meilleures perspectives de détection précoce des incursions de maladies animales transfrontalières parce qu'elles sont menées de manière systématique et exhaustive dans les élevages, et parce qu'elles se concentrent sur la période entre l'introduction de la maladie et le moment où le premier échantillon est envoyé au laboratoire pour analyse. Les auteurs proposent la mise en oeuvre d'un protocole de surveillance passive renforcée fondé sur la collecte de données via des actions de surveillance participative utilisant un système de notation objectif et adaptable, en vue d'une détection précoce de la PPA et de la PPC dans les élevages. Ce protocole a été appliqué en République dominicaine, pays infecté par la PPA et la PPC, dans deux élevages porcins commerciaux pendant dix semaines. Cette étude était destinée à valider le principe de la méthode et se fondait sur le protocole de surveillance passive renforcée pour mieux détecter les variations substantielles de la note de risque qui conduisent à tester les animaux. L'un des élevages suivis a présenté une variation de cette note, ce qui a conduit à tester les animaux mais les tests se sont révélés négatifs. L'étude permet d'évaluer certaines des faiblesses associées à la surveillance passive et apporte des enseignements applicables à ce problème. Les résultats illustrent le potentiel de l'approche à surmonter certaines des problématiques empêchant l'application extensive des protocoles de surveillance passive renforcée. Ils suggèrent également que des approches normalisées pourraient contribuer à la détection précoce des cas d'introduction de la PPC et de la PPA.

La peste porcina africana (PPA) y la peste porcina clásica (PPC) son enfermedades animales transfronterizas que afectan al cerdo. Periódicamente se dedican grandes esfuerzos y cuantiosos recursos a evitar que estas enfermedades penetren en zonas que están exentas de ellas. Las actividades de vigilancia pasiva son las más eficaces para detectar con prontitud toda incursión de enfermedades animales transfronterizas, no solo por la regularidad y amplitud con que se llevan a cabo en las explotaciones, sino también porque inciden específicamente en el intervalo entre la penetración de una enfermedad y el momento en que se envía la primera muestra para que sea sometida a pruebas de diagnóstico. Los autores propusieron que se aplicara un protocolo de vigilancia pasiva reforzada que reposaba en la obtención de datos mediante actividades de vigilancia participativa, empleando para ello un sistema objetivo y adaptable de puntuación que ayudaba a detectar con prontitud la presencia en las explotaciones de PPA o PPC. Dicho protocolo fue aplicado a lo largo de diez semanas en dos explotaciones porcinas industriales de la República Dominicana, país en el que ambas infecciones están presentes. El estudio, que sirvió para poner a prueba la idea, pasaba por la aplicación del protocolo de vigilancia pasiva reforzada para ayudar a detectar variaciones sustanciales de la puntuación del nivel de riesgo que activa la realización de pruebas. En una de las explotaciones estudiadas se produjo una variación de la puntuación, cosa que activó la realización de pruebas en los animales, aunque estas arrojaron resultado negativo. El estudio aquí descrito permite evaluar algunos de los puntos débiles de la vigilancia pasiva y extraer enseñanzas aplicables al problema. Los resultados demuestran que es posible salvar algunas de las dificultades que impiden la aplicación generalizada de protocolos de vigilancia pasiva reforzada y dejan pensar que quizá el uso de planteamientos normalizados pueda ayudar a detectar con prontitud los casos de penetración de PPC o PPA.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persistent hyperglycemia is common in alpacas and typically requires insulin administration for resolution; however, little is known about alpacas' response to different insulin formulations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of 3 insulin formulations on blood glucose concentrations and the use of a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in alpacas. ANIMALS: Six healthy alpacas. METHODS: The CGM was installed in the left paralumbar fossa at the start of this crossover study and recorded data every 5 minutes. Regular insulin, NPH insulin, insulin glargine, and dextrose were administered to each alpaca over a 2-week period. Blood samples were collected for glucose testing at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours, and then every 6 hours after each administration of insulin or dextrose. Data were compared by using method comparison techniques, error grid plots, and ANOVA. RESULTS: Blood glucose concentrations decreased most rapidly after regular insulin administration when administered IV or SC as compared to the other formulations. The NPH insulin produced the longest suppression of blood glucose. The mean CGM interstitial compartment glucose concentrations were typically lower than the intravascular compartment glucose concentrations. The alpacas had no adverse reactions to the different insulin formulations. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The NPH insulin might be more appropriate for long-term use in hyperglycemic alpacas because of its extended duration of action. A CGM is useful in monitoring glucose trends and reducing blood collection events, but it should not be the sole method for determining treatment protocols.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hospitalized alpacas are often hyperglycemic requiring frequent blood glucose testing. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of 4 brands of glucometers with a laboratory-based analyzer (LCA) over a range of glucose concentrations in alpacas. ANIMALS: Four healthy male alpacas. METHODS: A 2-treatment cross-over study was utilized. The alpacas were given 0.4 U/kg of regular insulin intravenously and then 500 mg/kg of dextrose intravenously with a 1 week washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected from 10 minutes before until 6 hours after drug administration. Glucose concentrations were measured in whole blood and plasma samples on 4 glucometers, and serum glucose was measured on an LCA. RESULTS: Glucometer performance varied depending on whether glucose concentrations were measured in plasma or whole blood. Based on error grid analysis, the Precision Xtra and One Touch Ultra 2 glucometers were clinically acceptable for testing whole blood samples, whereas the Accu-Chek Aviva and Nova StatStrip Xpress glucometers were clinically acceptable for testing plasma samples in comparison with serum glucose concentrations determined by the LCA. All glucometers had systematic and proportional biases that varied based on sample type. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Human-based glucometers in alpacas should be used cautiously, particularly at higher blood glucose concentrations. The blood sample type (plasma or whole blood) can alter meter performance when compared with serum glucose concentrations and potentially lead to errors in clinical decisions.

Asunto(s)