RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether a move to public housing affects people's use of healthcare services. METHOD: Using administrative data from Manitoba, the number of hospitalizations, general practitioner (GP), specialist and emergency department (ED) visits, and prescription drugs dispensed in the years before and after the housing move-in date (2012/2013) were measured for a public housing and matched cohort. Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations tested for differences between the cohorts in utilization trends. The data were modeled using Poisson (rate ratio, RR), negative binomial (incident rate ratio, IRR), and binomial (odds ratio, OR) distributions. RESULTS: GP visits (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06) and prescriptions (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05) increased, while ED visits (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-1.00) and hospitalizations (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.96) decreased over time. The public housing cohort had a significantly higher rate of GP visits (IRR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.13), ED visits (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.37), and prescriptions (IRR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13), and was more likely to be hospitalized (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.21-1.61) compared to the matched cohort. The rate of inpatient days significantly decreased for the public housing cohort, but did not change for the matched cohort. CONCLUSION: Healthcare use changed similarly over time (except inpatient days) for the two cohorts. Public housing provides a basic need to a population who has a high burden of disease and who may not be able to obtain and maintain housing in the private market.

Asunto(s)

Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vivienda Popular/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Manitoba

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Residence in public housing, a subsidized and managed government program, may affect health and healthcare utilization. We compared healthcare use in the year before individuals moved into public housing with usage during their first year of tenancy. We also described trends in use. METHODS: We used linked population-based administrative data housed in the Population Research Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. The cohort consisted of individuals who moved into public housing in 2009 and 2010. We counted the number of hospitalizations, general practitioner (GP) visits, specialist visits, emergency department visits, and prescriptions drugs dispensed in the twelve 30-day intervals (i.e., months) immediately preceding and following the public housing move-in date. Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations tested for a period (pre/post-move-in) by month interaction. Odds ratios (ORs), incident rate ratios (IRRs), and means are reported along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: The cohort included 1942 individuals; the majority were female (73.4%) who lived in low income areas and received government assistance (68.1%). On average, the cohort had more than four health conditions. Over the 24 30-day intervals, the percentage of the cohort that visited a GP, specialist, and an emergency department ranged between 37.0% and 43.0%, 10.0% and 14.0%, and 6.0% and 10.0%, respectively, while the percentage of the cohort hospitalized ranged from 1.0% to 5.0%. Generally, these percentages were highest in the few months before the move-in date and lowest in the few months after the move-in date. The period by month interaction was statistically significant for hospitalizations, GP visits, and prescription drug use. The average change in the odds, rate, or mean was smaller in the post-move-in period than in the pre-move-in period. CONCLUSIONS: Use of some healthcare services declined after people moved into public housing; however, the decrease was only observed in the first few months and utilization rebounded. Knowledge of healthcare trends before individuals move in are informative for ensuring the appropriate supports are available to new public housing residents. Further study is needed to determine if decreased healthcare utilization following a move is attributable to decreased access.

Asunto(s)

Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vivienda Popular/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Manitoba/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Áreas de Pobreza , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Residents of public housing are often in poor health. However, it is unclear whether poor health precedes residency in public housing. We compared the health of people who applied to public housing to people who did not apply and had similar socioeconomic characteristics. METHODS: Population-based administrative databases from Manitoba, Canada, containing health, housing and income assistance information were used to identify a cohort of individuals who applied to public housing and a matched cohort from the general population. Conditional logistic regression was used to test the association between a public housing application and health status and health service use, after controlling for income. RESULTS: There were 10 324 individuals in each of the public housing applicant and matched cohorts; the majority were women, young, urban residents, and received income assistance. A higher per cent of the public housing cohort had physician-diagnosed physical and mental health conditions compared to the matched cohort. Physical health, mental health and health service use were significantly associated with applying to public housing, after controlling for individual and area-level income. CONCLUSIONS: Applicants to public housing were in poorer health compared to people of the same income level who did not apply to public housing. These health issues may affect the long-term stability of their tenancy if appropriate services and supports are not provided. Additionally, preventing ill health, better management of mental health and additional supports may reduce the need for public housing, which, in turn, would alleviate the pressure on governments to provide this form of housing.