Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; : 1-9, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A single dose epinephrine protocol (SDEP) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) achieves similar survival to hospital discharge (SHD) rates as a multidose epinephrine protocol (MDEP). However, it is unknown if a SDEP improves SHD rates among patients with a shockable rhythm or those receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: This pre-post study, spanning 11/01/2016-10/29/2019 at 5 North Carolina EMS systems, compared pre-implementation MDEP and post-implementation SDEP in patients ≥18 years old with non-traumatic OHCA. Data on initial rhythm type, performance of bystander CPR, and the primary outcome of SHD were sourced from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. We compared SDEP vs MDEP performance in each rhythm (shockable and non-shockable) and CPR (bystander CPR or no bystander CPR) subgroup using Generalized Estimating Equations to account for clustering among EMS systems and to adjust for age, sex, race, witnessed arrest, arrest location, AED availability, EMS response interval, and presence of a shockable rhythm or receiving bystander CPR. The interaction of SDEP implementation with rhythm type and bystander CPR was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1690 patients accrued (899 MDEP, 791 SDEP), 19.2% (324/1690) had shockable rhythms and 38.9% (658/1690) received bystander CPR. After adjusting for confounders, SHD was increased after SDEP implementation among patients with bystander CPR (aOR 1.61, 95%CI 1.03-2.53). However, SHD was similar in the SDEP cohort vs MDEP cohort among patients without bystander CPR (aOR 0.81, 95%CI 0.60-1.09), with a shockable rhythm (aOR 0.96, 95%CI 0.48-1.91), and with a non-shockable rhythm (aOR 1.26, 95%CI 0.89-1.77). In the adjusted model, the interaction between SDEP implementation and bystander CPR was significant for SHD (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Adjusting for confounders, the SDEP increased SHD in patients who received bystander CPR and there was a significant interaction between SDEP and bystander CPR. Single dose epinephrine protocol and MDEP had similar SHD rates regardless of rhythm type.

2.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 5(2): e13144, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504776

RESUMEN

Decompression sickness describes the clinical pathology that ensues when rapid decompression from a highly pressurized environment causes the formation of venous and extravascular inert gas bubbles. Symptoms vary widely, commonly including arthralgias, myalgias, paresthesias, and numbness. Severe and potentially life-threatening pathology, such as neurologic impairment, cardiopulmonary instability, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, can occur as well. Most think of diving endeavors as a common exposure predisposing to this condition, commonly referred to as "the bends." Other occupational exposures documented in the medical literature include military training, caisson work, such as in mining and bridge construction, and hyperbaric treatment attendance. This article presents the case of a 32-year-old male presenting with a mottled rash, arthralgias, myalgias, headache, vision changes, and weakness, which is found to have decompression sickness secondary to occupational exposure in a factory-based pressurized chamber. The patient underwent two hyperbaric chamber sessions with complete resolution of his symptoms. During hospitalization, he was found to have a patent foramen ovale. The patient was counseled to avoid further occupational exposure.

3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(6): 832-837, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36377966

RESUMEN

Heat stroke is a problem that occurs primarily in the out-of-hospital environment. "Cool first, transport second" has been emphasized in consensus statements and systematic reviews regarding the treatment of exertional heat stroke by both EMS and the sports medicine/athletic training communities. However, there remains little guidance on cooling recommendations for the out-of-hospital care of non-exertional heat stroke or classic heat stroke. There is no consensus on the safety or feasibility of cooling classic heat stroke patients in the out-of-hospital environment using cold-water immersion. This case series describes the successful application of on-scene cold-water immersion for five classic heat stroke patients guided by real-time core temperature monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Golpe de Calor , Humanos , Inmersión , Temperatura , Golpe de Calor/terapia , Temperatura Corporal , Agua , Frío , Hospitales
4.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(2): 192-195, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35353005

RESUMEN

Historically, dispatch-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) protocols only allow chest compression instructions to be delivered for patients able to be placed in the traditional supine position. For patients who are unable to be positioned supine, the telecommunicator and caller have no option except to continue attempts to position supine, which may result in delayed or no chest compressions being delivered prior to emergency medical services arrival. Any delay or lack of bystander chest compressions may result in worsening clinical outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. We present the first two cases, to the best of our knowledge, of successfully delivered, bystander-administered, prone CPR instructions by a trained telecommunicator for two OHCA victims unable to be positioned supine.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos
5.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(6): 751-757, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36041188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest guidelines recommend epinephrine every 3-5 minutes during cardiac arrest resuscitation. However, it is unclear if multiple epinephrine doses are associated with improved outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine if a single-dose epinephrine protocol was associated with improved survival compared to traditional multidose protocols. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post study across five North Carolina EMS agencies from 11/1/2016 to 10/29/2019. Patients ≥18 years old with attempted resuscitation for non-traumatic prehospital cardiac arrest were included. Data were collected 1 year before and after implementation of the single-dose epinephrine protocol. Prior to implementation, all agencies used a multidose epinephrine protocol. The Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) was used to obtain patient outcomes. Study outcomes were survival to hospital discharge (primary) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Analysis was by intention to treat. Outcomes were compared pre- vs. post-implementation using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering within EMS agencies. Adjusted analyses included age, sex, race, shockable vs. non-shockable rhythm, witnessed arrest, automatic external defibrillator availability, EMS response interval, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS: During the study period there were 1,690 encounters (899 pre- and 791 post-implementation). The population was 74.7% white, 61.1% male, and had a median age of 65 (IQR 53-76) years. Survival to hospital discharge was similar pre- vs. post-implementation [13.6% (122/899) vs. 15.4% (122/791); OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.89-1.59]. However, ROSC was more common post-implementation [42.3% (380/899) vs. 32.5% (257/791); OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.54-0.81]. After adjusting for covariates, the single-dose protocol was associated with similar survival to discharge rates (aOR 0.88, 95%CI 0.77-1.29), but with decreased ROSC rates (aOR 0.58, 95%CI 0.47-0.72). CONCLUSION: A prehospital single-dose epinephrine protocol was associated with similar survival to hospital discharge, but decreased ROSC rates compared to the traditional multidose epinephrine protocol.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adolescente , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , North Carolina
7.
Evid Based Spine Care J ; 2(2): 49-54, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23637682

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A case report. OBJECTIVE: Pyogenic osteomyelitis is the most common form of vertebral infection and typically resolves following conservative treatment with antibiotics administered long term and immobilization. In cases of spinal instability, severe neurological deficit or disease refractory to medical management, neurosurgical intervention is warranted. Historically, these patients have undergone radical vertebral debridement and grafting with or without posterior instrumentation. We report the case of a 46-year-old female intravenous drug user presenting with L5 pyogenic osteomyelitis with L5 vertebral compression and cortex retropulsion following L2-L4 laminectomy for epidural abscess 8 weeks prior. METHODS: The patient underwent an anterior approach single-stage L5 corpectomy, L4/5 and L5/S1 discectomies, expandable titanium-cage insertion and anterior plating from L4 to the sacrum. RESULTS: The patient recovered without any complications. The infection was successfully eradicated and her fusion remains solid 18 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first case of L5 vertebral osteomyelitis treated with a single-stage corpectomy and anterior instrumentation.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA