RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Fetal therapy is part of the available care offer for several severe malformations. The place of these emergent prenatal interventions in the prenatal path of care is poorly known. The objective of this study is to describe the decision-making process of patients facing the option of an emergent in utero intervention. METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective monocentric descriptive study in the department of maternal-fetal medicine of Necker Hospital. We collected data regarding eligibility or not for fetal surgery and the pregnancy outcomes of patients referred for myelomeningocele, diaphragmatic hernia, aortic stenosis and low obstructive uropathies. RESULTS: All indications combined, 70% of patients opted for fetal surgery. This rate was lower in the case of myelomeningocele with 21% consent, than in the other pathologies: 69% for diaphragmatic hernias, 90% for aortic stenoses and 76% for uropathy. When fetal intervention was declined, the vast majority of patients opted for termination of pregnancy: 86%. In 14% of the considering fetal surgery, the patient was referred too far. CONCLUSION: The acceptance rate for fetal surgeries depends on condition. It offers an additional option and is an alternative for couples for which termination of pregnancy (TOP) is not an option. Timely referral to an expert center allows to discuss the place of a fetal intervention and not to deprive couples of this possibility.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Terapias Fetales , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía PrenatalRESUMEN
Toxidermia is a well-known complication of antidepressant therapy. The authors report two cases of adverse cutaneous reactions after treatment by several serotonin uptake blockers. The first case concerns a 38-year-old woman, who suffered from depressive disorder. She has been treated with fluoxetine. After eight days, a cutaneous reaction appeared. This reaction subsided when fluoxetine was stopped. Two months later, she had a prescription of paroxetine, and the same skin adverse effect appeared. The cutaneous lesion decreased with the suppression of paroxetine. The chronology of the eruption suggests that it was caused by an adverse reaction to the both serotonin uptake blockers. The second case concerns a 40-year-old man who had several prescriptions of antidepressant treatment in a period of one year: fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline. Each time a cutaneous reaction appeared. It is advisable to substitute after an adverse effect a medication from one of the other classes of antidepressants. But what we saw in these cases is that the serotonin uptake blockers could be involved in the same allergic reaction while these drugs have different chemistry structures. Only three of them have the same excipient. These cases ask the question of cross-reactivity between the serotonin uptake blockers.