RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Data on prior use of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in acute stroke management by mechanical thrombectomy are controversial. Our primary objective was to make a comprehensive comparative assessment of clinical and angiographic efficacy and safety outcomes in a large prospective observational study. METHODS: We included stroke patients who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy between 2019 and 2021, from an ongoing registry in twenty comprehensive stroke centers in France. We divided patients into two groups based on the thrombolytic agent used (Alteplase vs Tenecteplase). We then compared their treatment times, and their angiographic (TICI scale), clinical (mRS at three months and sICH) and safety outcomes after controlling for potential confounders using propensity score methods. RESULTS: We evaluated 1131 patients having undergone thrombectomy for the final analysis, 250 received Tenecteplase and 881 Alteplase. Both groups were of the same median age (75 vs 74 respectively), and had the same baseline NIHSS score (16) and ASPECTS (8). There was no significant difference for First Pass Effect (OR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.75), time required for reperfusion (OR 0.03, 95 % CI 0.09-0.16, p = 0.49), or for final reperfusion status. Clinically, functional independence at 90 days was similar in both groups (OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.61-1.10, p = 0.18) with the same risk of sICH (OR 1.36, 95 % CI 0.77-2.41, p = 0.28). However, Tenecteplase patients had shorter imaging-to-groin puncture times (99 vs 142 min, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase showed no better clinical or angiographic impact on thrombectomy compared to Alteplase. Nevertheless, it appeared associated with a shorter thrombolysis-to-groin puncture time.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Sistema de Registros , Tenecteplasa , Trombectomía , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Humanos , Tenecteplasa/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trombectomía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angiografía Cerebral , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Francia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: Hemichorea-hemiballismus is a rare hyperkinetic movement disorder. Case Report: A 90-year-old male developed left hemichorea-hemiballismus after his second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. A wide range of investigations including magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal an alternative cause. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) showed increases in right putamen fixation compared to the left side. The patient showed significant improvement after five days of intravenous corticosteroids, with a normal FDG-PET. Discussion: This hemichorea-hemiballismus case shows dynamic restoration of putamen metabolism mirroring clinical evolution after administration of corticosteroids, suggesting an autoimmune COVID-19 vaccine-induced reaction.