RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: There is reluctance to use donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs for fear of worse outcomes due to increased warm ischemia time. Extensive evidence to confirm the quality of DCD pancreas transplants is not manifest. METHODS: A united network for organ sharing database review of pancreas transplants performed between 1996 and 2012 was conducted. We compared outcomes and all demographic variables between donors after cardiac death and donors after brain death in pancreas transplantation. RESULTS: There were 320 DCD pancreas transplants and 20,448 donation after brain death pancreas transplants performed in the United States between 1996 and 2012. There was no statistically significant difference in graft survival or patient survival in pancreas transplantation in DCD versus donation after brain death donors measured at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year intervals. There was no significant difference between donor and recipient age, race, sex, and body mass index (BMI) between the groups. There was no significant difference between the recipient ethnicity or time on wait list between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreata procured by DCD have comparable outcomes to those procured after brain death. Donation after cardiac death pancreas transplant is a viable method of increasing the donor pool, decreasing wait list mortality, and improving the quality of life for type 1 diabetic patients.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Trasplante de Páncreas , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Adolescente , Adulto , Causas de Muerte , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Listas de Espera , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Heavy post-transplant immunosuppression may contribute to long-term immunosuppression dependence by subverting tolerogenic mechanisms; thus, we sought to determine if this undesirable consequence could be mitigated by pretransplant lymphoid depletion and minimalistic post-transplant monotherapy. STUDY DESIGN: Lymphoid depletion in 17 unselected pediatric recipients of live (n = 14) or deceased donor kidneys (n = 3) was accomplished with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (n = 8) or alemtuzumab (n = 9). Tacrolimus was begun post-transplantation with subsequent lengthening of intervals between doses (spaced weaning). Maintenance immunosuppression, morbidity, graft function, and patient/graft survival were collated. RESULTS: Steroids were added temporarily to treat rejection in two patients (both ATG subgroup) or to treat hemolytic anemia in two others. After 16 to 31 months (mean 22), patient and graft survival was 100% and 94%, respectively. The only graft loss was in a nonweaned noncompliant recipient. In the other 16, serum creatinine was 0.85 +/- 0.35 mg/dL and creatinine clearance was 90.8 +/- 22.1 mL/1.73 m2. All 16 patients are on monotherapy (15 tacrolimus, one sirolimus), and 14 receive every other day or 3 times per week doses. There were no wound or other infections. Two patients developed insulin-dependent diabetes. CONCLUSION: The strategy of lymphoid depletion and minimum post-transplant immunosuppression appears safe and effective for pediatric kidney recipients.