RESUMEN

Folie à deux is a rare condition in which a single person (often with a psychiatric disorder) develops a delusion that is shared by another person. Folie à troix is when a delusion is shared by three people. This case report documents the unusual case of an individual who shared delusions with two different people simultaneously. This report inspires questions about this person, her delusions, and what made them so believable to others. It is known that the development of shared delusions most commonly occurs in relative isolation and disproportionately affects individuals with preexisting psychiatric comorbidities. Because of these risk factors, delusions in a psychiatric unit may be even more "contagious" than in the general population. To our knowledge, this case report is the first to document a newly developed delusion shared between two unrelated patients in a single psychiatric unit. While physical separation of patients is the best practice in such cases, a risk-benefit analysis is needed prior to this intervention given the social barriers that may limit such an approach. Further research is needed to diagnose, manage, and optimize treatment for shared delusions in settings such as inpatient psychiatric facilities.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Over the last decade, there has been an increased focus on firearm use in violent acts and suicides. There is no known published firearm safety curriculum specific to psychiatric training and limited guidance on curriculum development from national organizations. The authors' goals were to develop a firearm lecture series that would encompass essential knowledge related to firearm safety and risk assessments and assess its effect on psychiatric residents' interest and confidence in firearm safety guidance. METHODS: The authors developed a six-lecture series on firearm safety that was conducted over all post-graduate year (PGY) training levels and a grand rounds on basic firearm safety. All levels of psychiatry residents at one urban academic center participated in a pre- and post-lecture series questionnaire designed to evaluate attitudes related to firearm safety guidance. They developed and administered the questionnaire through New Innovations collecting qualitative and quantitative data for analysis. The quantitative analysis was completed using paired t-test. RESULTS: Forty-seven residents participated. Twenty-seven respondents met inclusion criteria: attended at least one lecture or the grand rounds, completed pre- and post-lecture surveys, and submitted their pre-lecture survey before their first lecture. After the educational intervention, there was a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in interest in firearm safety, and confidence in all areas surveyed-risk assessment, safety guidance, and pertinent legislation. CONCLUSIONS: The curriculum increased residents' interest and confidence in providing firearm safety guidance. Areas of development include assessing the curriculum's impact on clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: : Despite treatment with antipsychotic medication, approximately 1/3 of individuals with schizophrenia will fail to have an adequate response. To treat these patients, a commonly utilized approach is antipsychotic combination therapy. Antipsychotic combination therapy is controversial with mixed efficacy and tolerability results. It is also unclear if antipsychotic combination therapy reduces or increases the risk of psychiatric hospitalization. AREAS COVERED: : The authors review the prevalence, efficacy and tolerability concerns, and rationale behind antipsychotic combination therapy. Evidence comparing antipsychotic monotherapy vs polypharmacy using hospitalization as an outcome measure is summarized. EXPERT OPINION: : Psychiatric rehospitalization is a useful measure of treatment effectiveness, incorporating aspects of treatment efficacy and tolerability. The evidence comparing the impact of antipsychotic monotherapy vs combination therapy on rehospitalization is mixed. Evidence is primarily retrospective in nature, and there is high heterogeneity between studies, which could partially explain the mixed results. There is likely a subset of patients for whom antipsychotic combination therapy reduces the risk of hospitalization greater than antipsychotic monotherapy. Patients should be treated individually taking into account their specific pattern of response.

Asunto(s)