RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Steroid withdrawal (SW) after heart transplantation (HT) reduces steroid-associated side effects, although it can increase acute rejection episodes (ARE). Patient selection criteria for SW and the time elapsed after HT for this maneuver are controversial issues. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of late SW after HT with regard to the occurrence of ARE and to analyze risk factors resulting in a poor evolution. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 24 patients who underwent SW late after HT. All of them had gone at least 4 years without any ARE. Independent variables were time after HT, general recipient and donor data, risk factors for ARE, and immunosuppression. The dependent variables were occurrence of ARE (proven or not proven with endomyocardial biopsy) and time and severity of ARE. RESULTS: Among 24 HT patients including 96% men with an overall mean age of 57 years who underwent SW, the mean follow-up was 2.32 +/- 0.86 years. Six patients (25%) displayed an ARE >or=2R according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) at 5 +/- 3 months after SW. There were no deaths. Time from the last rejection episode to SW was 6.6 +/- 2 years. All ARE were treated with steroid boluses (mean total dose 1583 +/- 1044 mg). Among the HT patients with ARE, 5 (85%) had never experienced ARE after HT. Upon long-term follow-up, there were 2 deaths: 1 sudden death at 30 months after SW and 1 due to allograft vasculopathy at 20 months post-SW. Currently 92% are New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 67% +/- 10%. CONCLUSIONS: In our series of HT with late SW after HT (even among an HT population with a low risk of rejection), there was a 25% rate of ARE. This study did not allow us to identify risk factors for ARE after SW. We believe that based upon these observations SW should be implemented with caution.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Trasplante de Corazón/fisiología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Trasplante de Corazón/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Because of improved long-term survival of heart transplants (HT), patients often need noncardiac surgery (NCS). Immunosuppression may increase the infection rate. Inadequate management may increase the risk of dysfunction or acute rejection episodes (ARE). Long-term outcomes of NCS and optimal immunosuppressive management in the perioperative period are not well known. The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence, morbidity, and mortality of late NCS after HT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the incidence and type of late NCS as well as the risk factors for complications and the mortality among 207 HT patients. Immunosuppression and ARE rates were also analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen late NCS (84.5% elective) were performed in 72 HT patients (34.8%). Interventions were: 35 urologic (30.2%), 29 abdominal (25%), 14 vascular (12.1%), 13 ENT (11.2%), 11 skin and soft tissue (9.5%), and 7 orthopedic (6%). Malignancy was the main indication for NCS (33.6%). Only 4 patients (5.6%) died preoperatively. Mortality was higher among emergent vs elective procedures (16.6% vs 1%; P = .012) and among patients with preoperative high vs middle/low risk (26.6% vs 0%). Postsurgical infection was the most frequent complication (6.9%). However, there were no relevant complications in 82.8% of HT patients. Hospitalization time was <15 days in two thirds of patients. Immunosuppression was modified in 33 patients (28.4%), especially when the surgical indication was neoplasia (P < .001). None of the patients with NCS displayed allograft dysfunction or an ARE. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of HT patients needed a late NCS. In our experience, elective surgical procedures with middle/low preoperative cardiovascular risk are safe. In this context, the risk of rejection was low when immunosuppression was carefully monitored to reduce the risk of infection.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón/fisiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/clasificación , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine clinical and prognostic differences between preserved and deteriorated systolic function (defined as left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions > or = 50% and < 50%, respectively) in patients with heart failure satisfying modified Framingham criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records were studied of 1252 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) (mean (SD) age 69.4 (11.7) years; 485 women, 767 men) who had been admitted to a cardiology service for CHF in the period 1991-2002 and whose LV systolic function had been echocardiographically evaluated within two weeks of admission. Data were collected on the main clinical findings, supplementary examinations, treatment, and duration of hospitalisation. Whether the patient was alive in the spring of 2003 was evaluated by searching the general archives of the hospital and by telephone survey. RESULTS: LV systolic function was preserved in 39.8% of patients. Age, female to male sex ratio, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation, valve disease, and other non-ischaemic, non-dilated cardiopathies were all significantly greater in the group with preserved systolic function. New York Heart Association functional class IV, third heart sound, jugular vein congestion, cardiomegaly, radiological signs of lung oedema, pathological Q waves, left bundle branch block, sinus rhythm, ischaemic cardiopathy, and dilated cardiomyopathy were all significantly more prevalent in the group with deteriorated systolic function, as was treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and most other antihypertensive drugs on discharge from hospital. There was no significant difference in survival between the groups with preserved and deteriorated systolic function (either survival regardless of age at admission or in subgroups aged < 75 and > or = 75 years at admission). In the whole group, survival rates after one, three, and five years were 84.0%, 66.7%, and 50.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In view of the poor prognosis of patients with CHF with preserved LV systolic function, who are currently treated empirically, it is to be hoped that relevant controlled clinical trials under way will afford information allowing optimisation of their treatment.