RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychological stress has an established bi-directional relationship with obesity. Mindfulness techniques reduce stress and improve eating behaviours, but their long-term impact remains untested. CALMPOD (Compassionate Approach to Living Mindfully for Prevention of Disease) is a psychoeducational mindfulness-based course evidenced to improve eating patterns across a 6-month period, possibly by reducing stress. However, no long-term evaluation of impact exists. AIMS: This study retrospectively evaluates 2-year outcomes of CALMPOD on patient engagement, weight and metabolic markers. METHOD: All adults with a body mass index >35 kg/m2 attending an UK obesity service during 2016-2020 were offered CALMPOD. Those who refused CALMPOD were offered standard lifestyle advice. Routine clinic data over 2 years, including age, gender, 6-monthly appointment attendance, weight, haemoglobin A1C and total cholesterol, were pooled and analysed to evaluate CALMPOD. RESULTS: Of 289 patients, 163 participated in the CALMPOD course and 126 did not. No baseline demographic differences existed between the participating and non-participating groups. The CALMPOD group had improved attendance across all 6-monthly appointments compared with the non-CALMPOD group (P < 0.05). Mean body weight reduction at 2 years was 5.6 kg (s.d. 11.2, P < 0.001) for the CALMPOD group compared with 3.9 kg (s.d. 10.5, P < 0.001) for the non-CALMPOD group. No differences in haemoglobin A1C and fasting serum total cholesterol were identified between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective evaluation of CALMPOD suggests potential for mindfulness and compassion-based group educational techniques to improve longer-term patient and clinical outcomes. Prospective large-scale studies are needed to evaluate the impact of stress on obesity and the true impact of CALMPOD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite their beneficial effects on weight loss and blood lipids, high-protein (HP) diets have been shown to increase insulin resistance and diabetes risk, whereas high-cereal-fiber (HCF) diets have shown the opposite effects on these outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effects of isoenergetic HP and HCF diets and a diet with moderate increases in both cereal fibers and dietary protein (Mix diet) on insulin sensitivity, as measured by using euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps with infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose. DESIGN: We randomly assigned 111 overweight adults with features of the metabolic syndrome to 1 of 4 two-phased, 18-wk isoenergetic diets by group-matching. Per 3-d food protocols, the percentages of energy derived from protein and carbohydrates and the intake of cereal fiber per day, respectively, were as follows-after 6 wk: 17%, 52%, and 14 g (control); 17%, 52%, and 43 g (HCF); 28%, 43%, and 13 g (HP); 23%, 44%, and 26 g (Mix); after 18 wk: 17%, 51%, and 15 g (control); 17%, 51%, and 41 g (HCF); 26%, 45%, and 14 g (HP); and 22%, 46%, and 26 g (Mix). Eighty-four participants completed the study successfully and were included in the final analyses. Adherence was supported by the provision of tailored dietary supplements twice daily in all groups. RESULTS: Insulin sensitivity expressed as an M value was 25% higher after 6 wk of the HCF diet than after 6 wk of the HP diet (subgroup analysis: 4.61 ± 0.38 compared with 3.71 ± 0.36 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), P = 0.008; treatment × time interaction: P = 0.005). Effects were attenuated after 18 wk (treatment × time interaction: P = 0.054), which was likely explained by lower adherence to the HP diet. HP intake was associated with a tendency to increased protein expression in adipose tissue of the translation initiation factor serine-kinase-6-1, which is known to mediate amino acid-induced insulin resistance. Biomarkers of protein intake indicated interference of cereal fibers with dietary protein absorption. CONCLUSION: Greater changes in insulin sensitivity after intake of an isoenergetic HCF than after intake of an HP diet might help to explain the diverse effects of these diets on diabetes risk. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00579657.