RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In-utero myelomeningocele repair is the gold standard treatment after the publication of the MOMS trial. We have performed a retrospective analysis from our prospective in-utero myelomeningocele closure database (started in 2011), and selected only patients with the incontinent bladder pattern according to the Leal da Cruz categorization (Leal da Cruz, et al. J Urol 2015) to review mid-term clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 30 patients with leaking pressure under 40 cmH20 (incontinent pattern) at first urodynamic evaluation (UE) from the whole cohort of 129 patients who underwent in-utero myelomeningocele closure. We selected patients with a minimum active follow-up of 48 weeks (4 years) to provide mid-term data. Patients were followed according to the same protocol with the proposal of yearly sonogram and UE. All clinical and radiological data were reviewed. RESULTS: We found 11 patients, with a mean age of 10.2 years old, median age at diagnosis of 19 weeks, surgery performed at 25.6 weeks and birth at 33.2 weeks. The mean follow-up was 81.73 months (6.81 years). Mean age at first urological evaluation was 5 months, and UE was 5.6 months. Febrile UTI incidence in the whole observation period was 27.3%. The average initial DLPP was 30 cmH2O. 71.4% of the patients had bladder capacity less than 50% of the expected age. Bladder compliance could not be determined in 63.7% of cases due to leakage. A total of 5.7 urodynamic studies per patient were performed. Surgery was recommended for 8 patients and done in 4 (36.3%). Surgery consisted of Macedo catheterizable reservoir and Macedo-Malone ACE, associated with urethral sling (2 patients) and bladder neck closure (2). It took an average of 5 UE before the final surgical decision was confirmed. Last urodynamic study showed persistent leakage and low DLPP in 3 patients, normal bladder pressure in 2 (under CIC and anticholinergics), and 1 patient changed his bladder pattern into a high risk group. All operated patients are fully continent (urinary >4hs) and fecal. CONCLUSION: Despite initially presenting a low risk for the most patients, we found surgery in 36.3% (4/11) and if we considered all cases with surgery indication proposed to treat urinary incontinence it would be even higher (72.7%).