RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Urological disease is prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. Concurrently, the inability to maintain employment or provide family care contributes to poverty. We assessed the microeconomic impacts of urological disease in Belize. METHODS: We conducted a prospective survey-based assessment of patients evaluated during surgical trips by the charity Global Surgical Expedition. Patients completed a survey focusing on impact of urological disease on work and caretaker responsibilities, as well as its economic impact. The primary study outcome was income loss resulting from work impairment or work time missed related to urological disease. Income loss was calculated using the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients completed surveys. Overall, 87.7% and 37.2% of respondents reported a negative impact of urological disease on job and caretaking responsibilities, respectively. Nine (7.9%) patients were unemployed secondary to their urological disease. Sixty-one (53.5%) patients provided financial data sufficient for analysis. In this cohort, median weekly income was $250 Belize dollars (approximately $125 United States Dollars), while median weekly cost for urological disease treatment was $25 Belize dollars. Among the 21 (34.5%) patients who missed work due to urological disease, median weekly income loss was $35.6 Belize dollars, representing 55% of their total income. A vast majority (88.6%) of patients reported that cure of urological disease would increase ability to work and/or care for family. CONCLUSIONS: In Belize, urological disease results in significant impairment of work and caretaking responsibilities, as well as income loss. Efforts are necessary to provide urological surgeries in low- and middle-income countries as urological disease impacts not only quality of life, but also financial health.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) suffer from a high burden of comorbidities, which are managed with multiple medications. Determinants of prescription patterns are largely unknown in this population. This study assesses temporal changes and factors associated with medication prescription in a nationally representative population of patients on PD under the universal coverage healthcare system in Brazil. METHODS: Incident patients recruited in the Brazilian Peritoneal Dialysis Study (BRAZPD) from December 2004 to January 2011, stratified by prior hemodialysis (HD) treatment, were included in the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between medication prescription and socioeconomic factors. Yearly prevalent cross-sections were calculated to estimate prescription over time. RESULTS: Medication prescription was in general higher among patients who had previously received HD, compared with those who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) directly on PD. Prescription increased from baseline to 6 months of PD therapy, particularly in those who did not previously receive HD. After accounting for patient characteristics, significant associations were found between socioeconomic factors, geographic region, and medication prescription patterns. Finally, the prescription of all cardioprotective and anemia medications and phosphate binders increased significantly over time. CONCLUSION: In a PD population under universal coverage in a developing country, there was an increase in drug prescription during the first 6 months on PD, and a trend toward more liberal prescription of medications in later years. Independent from patient characteristics and comorbidities, socioeconomic factors influenced drug prescriptions that likely impact patient outcome, calling for public health action to decrease potential inequities in management of comorbidities in PD patients.