RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain is a multidimensional condition of multiple origins. Determining both intensity and underlying cause are critical for effective management. Utilization of painkillers does not follow any guidelines relying on biomarkers, which effectively eliminates objective treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of serum cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) as pain biomarkers. This work could significantly advance the diagnosis and treatment of pain. METHODS: We assessed the potential utility of serum COX-2 and iNOS as objective measures of pain in a sample of American patients. Pain was scaled between level 0-5 in accordance with the level reported by the patients. Blood samples were collected from 102 patients in the emergency room. Sandwich ELISA was used to determine the COX-2 and iNOS levels in the blood serum while statistical analysis was performed using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, Regression and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses. The biomarker results were also compared with self-reports of pain by the patients using conventional pain ratings and patients were asked to report the cause of the pain. Pain levels were clustered into four groups as 0 [self-reported 0], 1 [self-reported as 1], 2 [self-reported as 2 and 3] and 3 [self-reported as 4 and 5]. Co-expression of COX-2 and iNOS could significantly alter pain development and its sensitization. Therefore, iNOS dependent COX-2 levels were employed as categorized level. RESULTS: Self-reported pain levels did not show a correlation with the serum level of COX-2 and iNOS. The lack of correlation is attributed to multiple reasons including patients' intake of painkillers prior to participation, painkiller intake habit, chronic diseases, and subjectivity of self-reported pain. Increased serum COX-2 levels were reported in relation to the subtypes of these health issues. Further, 83% of the patients who reported pain also showed the presence of COX-2 in serum, while only 53% of the patients showed the presence of iNOS in serum. Moderate relation was found between the clustered pain level and categorized COX-2 and iNOS- levels. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the requirement of further studies to use COX-2 and iNOS as prognostic biomarkers for objective quantification of pain at the clinical level.
Asunto(s)
Ciclooxigenasa 2/sangre , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/sangre , Dolor/sangre , Dolor/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/metabolismo , Dolor/metabolismo , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To reduce the reperfusion time with thrombolytics. METHODS: The study was done at Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahimyar Khan, between January and October 2009, and comprised all consecutive patients with ST segment Myocardial Infarction presenting to the hospital in emergency. In phase one, emergency medical services of Rescue 1122 were utilised to minimize transportation time and thrombolytics were instituted in the Emergency Department or the Coronary Care Unit. In Phase II, a chest pain unit was established in the Emergency Department and all patients were thrombolysed there. A proforma describing Total time, Door-to-needle time, demographics, reperfusion criteria, immediate and delayed complications was filled up for each patient. Comparative groups were analysed using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were enrolled. Of them 15 (5.15%) were rescued by the emergency medical services, while 276 (94.84%) presented themselves or were referred. Mean age was 51 +/- 11.5 years. There were 245 (84%) males. Thirty (10.30%) patients were thrombolysed at the Chest Pain Unit; 216 (74.22%) at the Coronary Care Unit; and 45 (15.46%) in the Emergency Department. Total time was 3:52, 5:29, and 4:55 hours respectively (p = 0.003). Door-to-needle time was significantly reduced in the chest pain unit (p = 0.0001). Total time was minimum in emergency medical services (p = 0.0001). ST segment resolution > 70% was maximum in the chest pain unit (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: There was remarkable reduction in Total time utilising emergency medical services and door-to-needle time by establishing the chest pain unit. It is strongly recommended thatsuch units be developed in all districts and tertiary care hospitals as a cost-effective facility.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ambulancias , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) in treating patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Preliminary results of this study were previously reported. The updated results are reported in this paper. METHODS: Ninety seven patients with TN refractory to medical or surgical management underwent GKS between September 1998 and October 2005. Fifteen patients had multiple sclerosis (MS). The radiation dose was escalated from 70 to 99 Gy. The Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Scale (BNIPS) was used to assess pain before and after GKS. Eighty-four patients were available for evaluation with a mean follow up of 8.9 months. The overall response and complete response rates were 70.2% and 36.9%, respectively. At 12 months, there was a greater improvement in BNIPS scores for patients who were treated with two isocenters compared with those treated with a single isocenter. The mean percentage of pain decrease was 56.26% compared with 11.53% (p < 0.001). Patients treated with two isocenters rather than one and patients receiving greater than 85 Gy compared with lower doses had a longer duration of response. Only nine patients (11%) had mild numbness attributable to the GKS. Five of the nine patients experienced complete resolution of facial numbness on follow up. Patients with MS have a shorter duration of response compared with those without MS (p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: These updated results show that GKS continues to be an effective therapy for TN. It appears there is an enhanced response with doses 85 Gy or more and with two isocenters without increased complications.
Asunto(s)
Dolor/prevención & control , Radiocirugia/métodos , Neuralgia del Trigémino/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/patología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neuralgia del Trigémino/etiología , Neuralgia del Trigémino/patología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety and potential therapeutic benefit of spinal manipulation postepidural injection in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with cervical and lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: The study design was a retrospective review of outcomes of 20 cervical and 60 lumbar radiculopathy patients who underwent spinal manipulation postepidural injection in a hospital setting. Patients received either fluoroscopically guided or computed tomography (CT)-guided epidural injection of a combination of lidocaine and Depo-Medrol. The manual therapy consisted of an immediate postepidural application of flexion distraction mobilization and then high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation to the affected spinal regions. Outcome criteria were empirically defined as significant improvement, temporary improvement, or no change. The minimum follow-up time for all patients was 1 year. RESULTS: There were no complications associated with spinal manipulation, whereas 3 complications associated with the epidural injection procedure were noted. Of lumbar spine patients, 36.67% (n = 22) noted significant improvement, 41.67% (n = 25) experienced temporary improvement, and 21.67% (n = 13) reported no change. Of the patients undergoing spinal manipulation after cervical epidural injection, 50% (n = 10) noted significant improvement, 30% (n = 6) experienced temporary improvement, whereas 20% (n = 4) exhibited no change. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that spinal manipulation postepidural injection is a safe nonsurgical procedure to use in the treatment of the patient with radiculopathy of spinal origin. This is also the first report of the use of spinal manipulation postepidural injection in the cervical spine.