RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rifamycin SV is under development for treatment of travelers' diarrhea (TD) in a new oral formulation, Rifamycin SV MMX (RIF-MMX; Santarus Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), which targets its delivery to the colon, making it a unique rifamycin drug. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of adult travelers to Mexico or Guatemala experiencing acute diarrhea. A total of 264 patients received RIF-MMX (2 × 200 mg twice daily for 3 days, n = 199) or placebo (n = 65) in a 3 : 1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the length of time between the administration of first dose of study drug and passage of the last unformed stool (TLUS; after which clinical cure was declared). Other endpoints included eradication of pathogens from the stools, pathogen minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: TLUS was significantly shorter in the RIF-MMX group (median: 46.0 hours) compared with placebo (median: 68.0 hours; p = 0.0008) and a larger percentage of RIF-MMX treated patients (81.4%) achieved clinical cure compared with placebo patients (56.9%). TLUS was significantly shorter in the subgroups of patients with enteroaggregative, enterotoxigenic, or diffusely adherent Escherichia coli infections (p = 0.0035) with nonsignificant activity against invasive bacteria (p = 0.3804). Overall pathogen eradication rates were numerically higher in the RIF-MMX group (67.0%) compared with placebo (54.8%) but the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.0836). In vitro resistance to rifamycin SV was observed in some bacteria remaining after treatment of patients with RIF-MMX but was not associated with lower efficacy in them. AEs appeared to be more frequent with placebo (38.5%) than with RIF-MMX (29.6%). CONCLUSIONS: RIF-MMX shortened the duration of TD in patients with a broad range of pathogens and was well tolerated. The unique pharmacokinetic properties of the drug offer evidence that TD pathogens work at the level of the colon.
Asunto(s)
Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Rifamicinas/administración & dosificación , Viaje , Administración Oral , Adulto , Diarrea/microbiología , Diarrea/prevención & control , Método Doble Ciego , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/prevención & control , Femenino , Guatemala , Humanos , Masculino , México , Rifaximina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
GOALS: To compare the effects of immediate-release omeprazole and 2 different delayed-release proton pump inhibitors on 24-hour intragastric acidity in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients. BACKGROUND: Because of its unique pharmacokinetic properties, immediate-release omeprazole does not need to be dosed before a meal to control intragastric acidity. Previous studies showed effectiveness of immediate-release omeprazole in controlling nocturnal intragastric acidity with bedtime dosing. This is the first study to compare the effects of prebreakfast dosing of immediate-release omeprazole and delayed-release lansoprazole and pantoprazole on 24-hour intragastric acidity. AIM: To compare the effects of prebreakfast dosing of immediate-release omeprazole 40 mg capsules, lansoprazole 30 mg capsules, and pantoprazole 40 mg tablets on 24-hour intragastric acidity. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease received 7 consecutive once-daily morning doses of each drug in this open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover study. On day 7, intragastric pH was recorded for 24 hours. RESULTS: After 7 days, the percentage of time with intragastric pH >4 over 24 hours was 59.7% (14.3 hours) with immediate-release omeprazole, 48.8% (11.7 hours) with lansoprazole (P=0.005), and 41.8% (10.0 hours) with pantoprazole (P<0.001). Median intragastric pH was significantly higher with immediate-release omeprazole than with lansoprazole (P=0.003) or pantoprazole (P<0.001). All drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: When dosed in the morning, immediate-release omeprazole provided significantly better control of 24-hour intragastric acidity than lansoprazole and pantoprazole.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Ácido Gástrico/química , Determinación de la Acidez Gástrica , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Lansoprazol , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omeprazol/administración & dosificación , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Pantoprazol , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that a new immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. DESIGN: A noninferiority analysis was used to compare rates of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a prospective, phase 3, double-blind trial with parallel omeprazole suspension and cimetidine treatment groups. SETTING: A total of 47 intensive care units in the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 359 critically ill patients who required mechanical ventilation for > or =48 hrs, had an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score of > or =11 at baseline, had an intact stomach with a nasogastric or orogastric tube in place, and had at least one additional risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to treatment with omeprazole suspension (two 40-mg doses on day 1, via orogastric or nasogastric tube, and 40 mg each day thereafter) or intravenous cimetidine (300-mg bolus and 50 mg/hr thereafter) for up to 14 days. Gastric aspirates were sampled for bleeding and pH. Medication doses were doubled for failure of pH control (two successive aspirates with pH < or = 4). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding (bright red blood not clearing after 5-10 mins of lavage or persistent Gastroccult-positive "coffee-grounds" material for 8 hrs on days 1-2 or for 2-4 hrs on days 3-14 and not clearing with > or =100 mL of lavage) was the primary end point of the trial. The rate of clinically significant bleeding in the per-protocol population was 4.5% with omeprazole suspension and 6.8% with cimetidine, meeting the criteria for the noninferiority of omeprazole suspension. Median gastric pH was > or =6 on all trial days with omeprazole suspension treatment and on 50% of days with cimetidine treatment (p < .001, all trial days). In the omeprazole suspension group, median gastric pH was >4 on each trial day in 95% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate-release omeprazole suspension is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding and more effective than intravenous cimetidine in maintaining gastric pH of >4 in critically ill patients.
Asunto(s)
Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Cimetidina/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Omeprazol/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Formas de Dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/fisiopatología , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estómago/fisiopatología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Suspensiones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether LJP 394 delays or prevents renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a history of renal disease. METHODS: In a 76-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 230 SLE patients were randomized to receive 16 weekly doses of 100 mg of LJP 394 or placebo, followed by alternating 8-week drug holidays and 12 weekly doses of 50 mg of LJP 394 or placebo. An assay measuring the affinity of the serum IgG fraction for the DNA epitope of LJP 394 identified a high-affinity population of patients (189 of 213 patients; 89% taking LJP 394 and 90% taking placebo). Analyses were performed on both the intent-to-treat population and the high-affinity population. RESULTS: Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies decreased and C3 levels tended to increase during treatment with LJP 394. In the intent-to-treat population, the time to renal flare was not significantly different between treatment groups, but patients taking LJP 394 had a longer time to institution of high-dose corticosteroids and/or cyclophosphamide (HDCC) and required 41% fewer treatments with HDCC. In the high-affinity population, the LJP 394 group experienced a longer time to renal flare, 67% fewer renal flares, longer time to institution of HDCC, and 62% fewer HDCC treatments compared with the placebo group. In patients with serum creatinine levels >/=1.5 mg/dl at study entry, those taking LJP 394 had 50% fewer renal flares; no renal flares were observed in the high-affinity group taking LJP 394. Serious adverse events were observed in 25 of the 114 LJP 394-treated patients (21.9%) and 34 of the 116 placebo-treated patients (29.3%). CONCLUSION: Treatment with LJP 394 in patients with high-affinity antibodies to its DNA epitope prolonged the time to renal flare, decreased the number of renal flares, and required fewer HDCC treatments compared with placebo. The study drug appeared to be well tolerated.