RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case control. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study is to determine risk factors associated with chronic opioid use after spine surgery. METHODS: In our single institution retrospective study, 1,299 patients undergoing elective spine surgery at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2010 and August 2017 were enrolled into a prospectively collected registry. Patients were dichotomized based on renewal of, or active opioid prescription at 3-mo and 12-mo postoperatively. The primary outcome measures were risk factors for opioid renewal 3-months and 12-months postoperatively. These primarily included demographic characteristics, operative variables, and in-hospital opioid consumption via morphine milligram equivalence (MME). At the 3-month and 12-month periods, we analyzed the aforementioned covariates with multivariate followed by bivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Multivariate and bivariate analyses revealed that script renewal at 3 months was associated with black race (P = 0.001), preoperative narcotic (P < 0.001) or anxiety/depression medication use (P = 0.002), and intraoperative long lumbar (P < 0.001) or thoracic spine surgery (P < 0.001). Lower patient income was also a risk factor for script renewal (P = 0.01). Script renewal at 12 months was associated with younger age (P = 0.006), preoperative narcotics use (P = 0.001), and ≥4 levels of lumbar fusion (P < 0.001). Renewals at 3-mo and 12-mo had no association with MME given during the hospital stay or with the usage of PCA (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The current study describes multiple patient-level factors associated with chronic opioid use. Notably, no metric of perioperative opioid utilization was directly associated with chronic opioid use after multivariate analysis.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a clinical tool to pre-operatively risk-stratify patients undergoing spine surgery based on their likelihood to have high postoperative analgesic requirements. METHODS: A total of 1199 consecutive patients undergoing elective spine surgery over a 2-year period at a single center were included. Patients not requiring inpatient admission, those who received epidural analgesia, those who had two surgeries at separate sites under one anesthesia event, and those with a length of stay greater than 10 days were excluded. The remaining 860 patients were divided into a derivation and validation cohort. Pre-operative factors were collected by review of the electronic medical record. Total postoperative inpatient opioid intake requirements were converted into morphine milligram equivalents to standardize postoperative analgesic requirements. RESULTS: The postoperative analgesic intake needs (PAIN) score was developed after the following predictor variables were identified: age, race, history of depression/anxiety, smoking status, active pre-operative benzodiazepine use and pre-operative opioid use, and surgical type. Patients were risk-stratified based on their score with the high-risk group being more likely to have high opioid consumption postoperatively compared to the moderate and low-risk groups in both the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: The PAIN Score is a pre-operative clinical tool for patients undergoing spine surgery to risk stratify them based on their likelihood for high analgesic requirements. The information can be used to individualize a multi-modal analgesic regimen rather than utilizing a "one-size fits all" approach.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a thorough review of the literature regarding patient characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes of pancreatic cancer metastasis to the spine. We also provide an illustrative case from our institution of a patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting initially as cervical radiculopathy with an isolated cervical spine lesion. METHODS: Using the PRISMA guidelines, the literature in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases was searched. We excluded systematic reviews and meta-analyses that did not provide novel cases, as well as reports of metastatic disease from other nonpancreatic primary cancers. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients across 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The patients were predominantly male (58%), with a mean age of 59 years. Of patients, 64% presented with back pain, 39% with motor deficits, and 15% with bladder or bowel dysfunction. For treatment, chemotherapy was used in 55% of cases and radiotherapy in 42%. Surgical treatment was performed in 42% of cases, with complete tumor resection achieved in 24% of cases. The mean patient survival after treatment was 28 weeks (range, 1-83 weeks), with patients undergoing treatment involving surgery having increased survival (44 weeks) compared with noninvasive treatment alone (18 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal metastasis of pancreatic cancer is rare and typically portends a poor prognosis. It is vital to recognize the presence of spinal involvement early in the disease course and initiate treatment.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Radiculopatía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Columna VertebralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways implementation has not been previously explored in adult deformity patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of ERAS pathways implementation in adult patients undergoing open thoraco-lumbar-pelvic fusion for degenerative scoliosis on postoperative outcome, opioid consumption, and unplanned readmission rates. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, we included 124 consecutive patients who underwent open thoraco-lumbar-pelvic fusion from October 2016 to February 2019 for degenerative scoliosis. Primary outcomes consisted of postoperative supplementary opioid consumption in morphine equivalent dose (MED), postoperative complications, and readmission rates within the postoperative 90-d window. RESULTS: There were 67 patients in the ERAS group, and 57 patients served as pre-ERAS controls. Average patient age was 69 yr. The groups had comparable demographic and intraoperative variables. ERAS patients had a significantly lower rate of postoperative supplemental opioid consumption (248.05 vs 314.05 MED, P = .04), a lower rate of urinary retention requiring catheterization (5.97% vs 19.3%, P = .024) and of severe constipation (1.49% vs 31.57%, P < .0001), and fewer readmissions after their surgery (2.98% vs 28.07%, P = .0001). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to complex spine surgery can reduce opioid intake, postoperative urinary retention and severe constipation, and unplanned 90-d readmissions in the elderly adult population.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The analysis of perioperative electronic patient portal (EPP) communication may provide risk stratification and insight for complication prevention in patients with affective disorders (ADs). We aimed to understand how patterns of EPP communication in patients with AD relate to preoperative narcotic use, surgical outcomes, and readmission rates. METHODS: The records of adult patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between January 2010 and August 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for analysis. Primary outcomes included preoperative narcotic use, the number of perioperative EPP messages sent, rates of perioperative complications, hospital length of stay, emergency department (ED) visits within 6 weeks, and readmissions within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1199 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with an AD were more likely to take narcotics before surgery (51.69% vs. 41%, P < 0.001) and to have active EPP accounts (75.36% vs. 69.75%, P = 0.014) compared with controls. They were also more likely to send postoperative messages (38.89% vs. 32.75%, P = 0.030) and tended to send more messages (0.67 vs. 0.48, P = 0.034). The AD group had higher rates of postoperative complications (8.21% vs. 3.98%, P = 0.001), ED visits (4.99% vs. 2.43%, P = 0.009), and readmissions postoperatively (2.49% vs. 1.38%, P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: AD patients have specific patterns of perioperative EPP communication. They are at a higher risk of postoperative complications. Addressing these concerns early may prevent more serious morbidity and avoid unnecessary ED visits and readmissions, thus reducing costs and improving patient care.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Trastornos del Humor/complicaciones , Portales del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Anciano , Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Humor/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Spinal involvement in neurocysticercosis is rare and can lead to debilitating injury if not diagnosed and treated early. We aim to provide the reader with a thorough analysis of the best available evidence regarding patient characteristics, optimal treatment modality, and outcomes in cases of spinal neurocysticercosis. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science electronic databases was made according to the PRISMA guidelines. An illustrative case of intramedullary-cervical spinal disease is also presented for illustrative purposes. RESULTS: A total of 46 reports of 103 patients fitting the screening criteria were identified. Isolated spinal involvement was seen in 46.15% of patients. Most infections (76.92%) had an intradural extramedullary localization, with 43.27% of cases involving >1 spinal cord level. The most common presenting symptoms were motor deficits (77.88%), pain syndromes (64.42%), and sensory deficits (53.85%). Combined surgical resection and pharmacologic therapy was the most frequently used treatment modality (49.04%) and had the highest proportion of patients reporting symptomatic improvement at follow-up (78.43%). Combination therapy had a significantly higher rate of neurologic recovery compared with surgery alone (P = 0.004) or medical treatment (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal involvement in neurocysticercosis should be considered in patients from or who traveled to endemic areas presenting with ring-enhancing lesions. Combined treatment with surgery followed by cysticidal and steroid medication seems to be superior to surgery or medical treatment in isolation and seems to provide the highest chances of recovery.