Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 114(3): 352-358, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264573

RESUMEN

Background: No consensus exists about the indication for surgical rib fixation in patients with rib fractures. Comparison between studies is difficult since a classification system is lacking for rib fractures. We introduced the first classification system for rib fractures, analogue to the Muller AO classification system and tested the classification with an interobserver agreement study. Methods: The classification is build up by four characters: the first one describes the rib number, the second character describes the location of the fracture in cranial-caudal fashion, the third character describes the fracture type and the fourth character described the subtype of the fracture. An interobserver agreement study was performed with the new classification. Results: Twenty CT scans of patients with rib fractures were analyzed. A total of 197 unilateral and bilateral rib fractures were scored by four reviewers. The interobserver agreement was substantial [Fleiss of 0.62 (95% CI 0.59 0.65)]. Conclusion: This is the first classification for rib fractures worldwide. The interobserver agreement of the classification was substantial. This classification is the first step in identifying patients who would benefit from surgical rib fixation.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de las Costillas/clasificación , Fracturas de las Costillas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA