RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status can often dictate access to timely surgical care and postoperative outcomes. We sought to analyze the impact of county-level poverty duration on hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer outcomes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare 2010 to 2015 database linked with county-level poverty from the American Community Survey and the US Department of Agriculture between 1980 to 2010. Counties were categorized as never high-poverty, intermittent high-poverty, and persistent poverty. Hierarchical generalized linear models and accelerated failure time models with Weibull distribution were used to assess diagnosis, treatment, textbook outcomes, and survival. RESULTS: Among 41,077 patients, 1,758 (4.3%) lived in persistent poverty. Counties exposed to greater durations of poverty had increased proportions of non-Hispanic Black patients (never high-poverty: 7.6%, intermittent high-poverty: 20.4%, persistent poverty: 23.2%), uninsured patients (never high-poverty: 0.5%, intermittent high-poverty: 0.5%, persistent poverty: 0.9%), and patients with a rural residence (never high-poverty: 0.6%, intermittent high-poverty: 2.4%, persistent poverty: 11.5%). Individuals residing in persistent poverty had lower odds of undergoing resection (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.98), achieving textbook outcomes (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.84), and increased cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.15) (all P < .05). Non-Hispanic Black patients were less likely to present with early-stage disease (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.95) and undergo surgical treatment (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.66) compared to non-Hispanic White patients (both P < .01). Notably, non-Hispanic White patients in persistent poverty were more likely to present with early-stage disease (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.52) and undergo surgery for localized disease (odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.74) compared to non-Hispanic Black patients in never high-poverty (both P < .05). CONCLUSION: Duration of poverty was associated with lower odds of receipt of surgical treatment, achievement of textbook outcomes, and worse cancer-specific survival. Non-Hispanic Black patients were at particular risk of suboptimal outcomes, highlighting the impact of structural racism independent of socioeconomic status.
Asunto(s)
Medicare , Neoplasias , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pobreza , Pacientes no AseguradosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) transformed the US healthcare system, expanding healthcare insurance coverage. However, its impact on rare malignancies that lack an established screening strategy such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains ill-defined. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ICC were identified from the National Cancer Database and divided relative to ACA implementation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate association with stage at diagnosis, receipt of surgical and multimodal treatments, and survival. RESULTS: Among the 9095 patients, 5636 (62.0%) were diagnosed before and 3459 (38.0%) after the implementation of the ACA. Across US regions, rates of early-stage diagnosis increased in the post-ACA era (Northeast, 62.9% vs. 85.2%; South, 63.7% vs. 78.5%; Midwest, 62.1% vs. 83.4%; West, 55.5% vs. 75.4%; p < 0.001). On multivariate analyses, the post-ACA era was associated with increased early-stage diagnosis (OR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.79-2.69), and receipt of surgical treatment (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.38) (both p < 0.01). Furthermore, the ACA's Medicaid expansion (ME) was also associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99, p = 0.038). Of note, although the odds of receiving surgical treatment increased after ACA for non-Hispanic White patients (OR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.20-1.49; p < 0.001), no such effect was observed in non-Hispanic Black (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.71-1.45), Hispanic (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.99-2.09), or others (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.98-2.10) (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ACA increased rates of early diagnosis and receipt of surgical treatment. Additionally, ME improved short- and long-term outcomes. However, racial and socioeconomic disparities persist, resulting in inequitable access to care and outcomes for patients with ICC.