RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chest drain insertion after chest trauma is often associated with high rate of complications. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with blunt and penetrating chest trauma to prevent empyema and pneumonia after chest drain insertion has been debated. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo to prevent complications in patients with blunt and penetrating chest injuries who require the insertion of a chest drain. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and grey literature databases were searched during May 2017 for randomized clinical trails comparing prophylactic antibiotic versus placebo in patients with chest injuries requiring chest drain insertion. Good quality randomized studies which met the inclusion criteria were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias and then were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of the included studies was concluded using Stata to analyze the relative risk of empyema and pneumonia in these patients. RESULTS: The study identified 12 randomized studies that included 1263 patients with isolated blunt and penetrating chest trauma. The incidence of empyema after a chest drain insertion was 1% in the antibiotic group and 7.2% in the placebo group. The incidence of pneumonia after a chest drain insertion was 4.4% in the antibiotic group and 10.7% in the placebo group. The use prophylactic antibiotic in those patients was associated with a reduced risk of empyema (relative risk [RR] 0.25; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.49) and pneumonia (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71) after chest drain insertion when compared with placebo alone. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic antibiotic administration in patients with penetrating and blunt chest injuries requiring the insertion of a chest drain was associated with a reduced risk for post-traumatic empyema and pneumonia. Further studies should evaluate the optimal type, dose, and duration of antibiotic given to patients with chest trauma requiring chest drain insertion.
RESUMEN
Physical examination is a critical component of medical practice yet the focus on efficient patient turnover has impacted the availability of patients with clinical findings willing to be examined by students and skills' teaching is not consistent across clinical rotations. This work evaluates simulation methodologies for teaching of the peripheral arterial examination and evaluates whether skills learnt are transferable to clinical practice. Second-year medical students were taught peripheral arterial examination on a SimMan 3G or with simulated patients (SPs). Both groups were assessed by Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with outpatients who have been diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease. There was no difference in the pass rate at OSCE between the two groups. SimMan better facilitated repeated practice, group learning, peer teaching and discussion, which were highly valued by the students. Students felt that the SImMan tutorial did not facilitate development of spatial cognition or pattern recognition. They also felt less well prepared to deal with real patients in terms of having practised appropriate language, issuing instructions and attempting to reassure patients. Both methods of simulation teaching have distinct merits and the ideal approach maybe to use the SimMan in combination with SPs.
RESUMEN
Gastroduodenal intussusception secondary to gastrointestinal stromal tumour is a very rare cause for intestinal obstruction. The diagnosis of this condition can be challenging, as symptoms are often non-specific and intermittent. This article reports a case where the diagnosis was made preoperatively with abdominal imaging and was treated by a combination of endoscopic reduction and laparoscopic resection.