RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Purpose of this study is to compare the effects of various anaesthetic combinations on hemodynamics, sedation level, recovery period and complications in the patients which undergo pediatric cardiac catheterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four groups of anaesthetic combinations was created. The groups are classified as propofol-ketamine (group 1), propofol-dexmedetomidine (group 2), dexmedetomidine-ketamine (group 3), midazolam-ketamine (group 4) (for each group n=20). Baseline heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded. This parameters values were recorded at 0., 5., 10., 15., 20., 25., 30. minutes; and the groups were compared according to these measurements data. RESULTS: For heart rate, Group 2 and 3 reduce the HR more than the drugs of Group 1 and 4 (p < 0.05). The SpO2 values of Group 1 were measured to have 5% further reduction compared to the Group 2 and 3; and Group 4 has the same SpO2 recordings compared to the Group 3 (p < 0.05). Comparing the recovery times; Group 4 was found to have the highest recovery time compared to the other drug groups. It is found that additional doses are needed for recovery in Group 4 (p < 0.008). Side effects were lowest for Group 3 and highest for Group 4. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the complication rates, it is concluded that Group 3 is spotted as the better sedation method among the other groups. In terms of additional propofol dose, Group 1 would be the better choice. Thus, the clinician should choose the suitable methods for the patient.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Propofol/uso terapéutico , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Niño , Dexmedetomidina , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
The direct cardiac effects of morphine, alfentanil, ketamine, etomidate, thiopentone, midazolam and propofol were measured in isolated Wistar rat hearts. Experiments were performed using a multiple columnar Langendorff apparatus and the hearts were perfused with a modified Tyrode solution under constant pressure. Each drug was applied from a different column in rising concentrations at 5-min intervals. Dose ranges were chosen to compare effects at sub-clinical, clinically relevant and more than clinical concentrations. Six rat hearts were chosen at random for each drug. Only thiopentone reduced contractile force at a clinically relevant concentration: measured as g contractility per g heart weight-1 (mean +/- standard deviation), base-line contractility was 8.8 +/- 2.4, and contractility at 10(-4) mol litre-1 thiopentone was 7.1 +/- 1.5 (P < 0.01). Alfentanil was the only drug to have no significant effect on the isolated heart at any concentration. Propofol was not cardiodepressant at clinically relevant concentrations, but had a lower therapeutic range than the other drugs.