RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to determine the impact of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on sphincter function and overall well-being in patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) and diverting ileostomy due to rectal cancer. For this purpose, anal electromyography (aEMG), low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ)-C30 (generic for cancer) and CR29 (specific to colorectal cancer) were used. The primary endpoint of our study is to determine the effect of PFMT on sphincter function by aEMG, the secondary endpoint is to evaluate the effect on quality-of-life using the LARS score, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and CR-29 questionnaires. METHODS: Conducted between January 2017 and April 2018 at a tertiary hospital's general surgery clinic, the study included 32 patients between the ages of 18 and 75 who underwent low anterior resection and diverting ileostomy surgery. The patients were divided into two: the Study Group (SG), which started PFMT after surgery, and the Control Group (CG), which was not subjected to additional exercises. Six months after closure of the diverting ileostomy, both groups were evaluated with aEMG, LARS scores, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 and CR-29. RESULTS: aEMG duration values were significantly lower in the SG (17.6 m/sec vs. 19.9 m/sec; p=0.001). Additionally, a significant decrease in SG, major LARS rates (12.5% vs. 62.5%; p=0.004) and LARS scores (23.1 vs. 30.0; p=0.003) was observed. While there was no significant difference between the groups in EORTC-QLQ C30, increased sexual interest and decreased fecal incontinence were observed in SG in EORTC-QLQ-CR29. CONCLUSION: PFMT significantly improves LARS scores, quality-of-life questionnaires and aEMG parameters, positioning PFMT as an accessible, non-invasive, easy-to-use first-line treatment option in the treatment of LARS.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer remains a significant health concern, necessitating reliable prognostic indicators for effective management. This study explores the preoperative prognostic significance of the Glucose/Lymphocyte Ratio (GLR) in colorectal cancers. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed records of patients who underwent surgery for elective colorectal cancers between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021, at the Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital Gastroenterologic Surgery Department. Demographic, clinicopathological, and follow-up data were comprehensively assessed. A cutoff was established from GLR ratios and patients were divided into two groups for prognosis analysis. Results: The study enrolled 222 eligible patients, examining variables such as age, sex, ASA score, neoadjuvant treatment, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, tumor grade, TNM stage, and GLR. The groups consisted of 128 patients with low GLR and 94 patients with high GLR. Statistical analyses revealed relations between GLR levels (p ≤ 0.001) and various prognostic factors such as age (p = 0.034), Perineural Invasion (PNI) (p = 0.002), tumor grade (p = 0.017), TNM stage (p = 0.003), and surgery time (p = 0.029), individuals with GLR ≥ 3.04 were observed to show higher mortality rates (p = 0.001). Above GLR cutoff point of 3.04 patients showed better overall survival rates. All survival related parameters were related with prognosis in univariant Cox regression tests. In multivariant cox regression tests GLR ≥ 3.04 significantly increased mortality by 2.9 times. (p = 0.003). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that GLR, calculated from preoperative glucose and lymphocyte values serves as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancers. The findings suggest potential applications for GLR in survival analyses, with significant associations identified in age, PNI, tumor grade, TNM stage, and surgery time. Further investigations are warranted in homogeneous patient populations.
RESUMEN
Visceral obesity is an important factor that increases the risk of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. As calculating visceral fat is difficult and time-consuming, more practical fat measurements that are not time-consuming have been introduced. This study aimed to investigate the effects of perirenal fat thickness on postoperative complications and prognosis in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Perirenal fat thickness was measured from the dorsal aspect of the left kidney on preoperative computerized tomography of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. The effects of perirenal fat thickness on postoperative complications were investigated. Diagnostic test performance was examined using the Roc Curve test to determine the cutoff value for the perirenal fat thickness values according to the complication findings of the patients. The cutoff value of perirenal fat thickness was found to be above 25.1, according to the presence of complications in the patients. Those with a perirenal fat thickness greater than 25.1 mm were considered to have high perirenal fat thickness values, and those with a low perirenal fat thickness value were considered low. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased perirenal fat thickness is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. We believe that perirenal fat thickness measurement, as an indicator of visceral fat volume, can be used to identify patients at high risk of developing complications after colorectal cancer surgery. This may change the disease management and affect the patient information process.