RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite satisfactory efficacy of WHO-recommended second-line antiretroviral treatment for patients with HIV in low-income countries, the need for simplified, low-cost, and less-toxic maintenance strategies remains high. We compared boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy with dual therapy with boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine in patients on second-line antiretrovial therapy (ART). METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label, superiority, trial in the HIV services of five hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa (Yaoundé, Cameroon; Dakar, Senegal; and Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso). We recruited patients from the long-term, post-trial cohort of the ANRS 12169/2LADY study that compared the efficacy of three second-line combinations based on boosted protease inhibitors. Participants for our study were HIV-1 infected with multiple mutations including M184V, at first-line failure, aged 18 years and older, on boosted protease inhibitor plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) for at least 48 weeks with at least 48 weeks follow-up in the 2LADY trial, with two viral load measurements of less than 200 copies per mL in the previous 6 months, CD4 counts of more than 100 cells per µL, adherence of at least 90%, and no change to ART in the past 3 months. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive either monotherapy with their boosted protease inhibitor (once-daily darunavir 800 mg [two 400 mg tablets] boosted with ritonavir 100 mg [one tablet] or coformulation of lopinavir 200 mg with ritonavir 50 mg [two tablets taken twice per day]) or to boosted protease inhibitor plus once-daily lamivudine 300 mg (one 300 mg tablet or two 150 mg tablets). Computer-generated randomisation was stratified by study site and viral load at screening (< 50 copies per mL, and 50-200 copies per mL), and concealed from study personnel throughout the inclusion period. After randomisation, treatment allocation was not masked from clinicians or patients]. Patients had follow-up visits at weeks 4 and 12, and every 3 months until 96 weeks; if viral load exceeded 500 copies per mL at any visit, NRTI (tenofovir and lamivudine) were reintroduced into treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who had treatment failure at 96 weeks in the intention-to-treat analysis, where treatment failure was defined as one of the following: a confirmed viral load of more than 500 copies per mL, reintroduction of NRTI, or interruption of boosted protease inhibitor. We designed the study to detect a difference of 12% between groups in the primary outcome, with an expected 20% of patients having treatment failure in the monotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01905059. FINDINGS: Between March 5, 2014, and Jan 26, 2015, 265 participants were assigned to receive monotherapy (133) or boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine (132). At week 48, an independent data safety monitoring board reviewed data, and advised discontinuation of the monotherapy group because the number of failures had exceeded the expected 20%; therefore results here are for week 48. At this point, treatment failure occurred in four (3·0%; 95% CI 0·8-7·6) of 132 participants on dual therapy and 33 (24·8%; 17·7-33·0) of 133 participants on monotherapy (relative risk 8·2, 95% CI 3·0-22·5; odds ratio 10·6, 95% CI 3·6-42·1). The difference between groups (21·8%, 95% CI 13·9-29·7; p<0·0001) showed superiority of dual therapy compared with monotherapy. We recorded 46 severe adverse events of grade 3 or 4 (29 in the monotherapy group, 17 in the boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine group); one event in the montherapy group (intoxication resulting from co-administration of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir with an ergotamine derivate) was deemed related to study drug. Two participants in the monotherapy group and one in the dual therapy group died, all from causes not related to study drugs or procedures (one from complications from gastric cancer surgery, one in a work accident, and one from a lung disease of unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: After viral suppression with boosted protease inhibitor plus NRTI in second-line ART, maintenance therapy with boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine was associated with a high rate of success, despite the presence of M184V mutations at first-line treatment failure. Results indicated that boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy cannot be recommended for these patients. FUNDING: Agence National de Recherche sur le Sida et les hépatites and Janssen Pharmaceutica.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/métodos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Proteasa del VIH/uso terapéutico , Lamivudine/uso terapéutico , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Anti-VIH/economía , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Camerún/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Inhibidores de la Proteasa del VIH/administración & dosificación , VIH-1 , Humanos , Lamivudine/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Transcriptasa Inversa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Transcriptasa Inversa/uso terapéutico , Senegal/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate change in renal function in African patients initiating second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) including ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) with or without tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). METHODS: HIV-1-positive adults, failing standard first-line ART were randomized to either TDF/emtricitabine (FTC)+LPV/r, abacavir + didanosine +LPV/r or TDF/FTC+ darunavir (DRV)/r and followed for 18 months. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Data from 438 out of 454 randomized patients were analysed. Median age was 38 years and 72% were women. Initiation of PI/r-based second-line regimen induced a marked eGFR decline of -10.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 at week 4 in all treatment groups with a greater decrease in TDF/FTC+LPV/r arm (-15.1 ml/min/1.73 m2). At month 18, mean eGFR in the non-TDF containing regimen recovered its baseline level and was significantly greater than eGFR 18-month levels in the TDF-containing regimens that experienced only partial recovery (difference: -10.7; CI -16.8, -4.6; P=0.001 in TDF/FTC+LPV/r and -6.4; CI -12.5, -0.3; P=0.04 in TDF/FTC+DRV/r). At 18 months, prevalence of stage 3 chronic kidney disease was low (<3%) and not associated with treatment. One treatment discontinuation and five TDF dosage reductions for renal toxicities were reported in TDF-containing arms. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results suggest a reasonable renal tolerance of a regimen associating TDF/FTC+PI/r in African patients with eGFR>60 ml/ml/1.73 m2 at baseline. They also support the recommendation of reassessing renal function 1 month after initiation of treatment including ritonavir to account for the ritonavir-related artefactual decrease of eGFR and determine the new reference baseline value.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Población Negra , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/efectos adversos , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/métodos , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Retratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga ViralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-infected individuals experience mainly non-AIDS-related conditions, among which infectious events are prominent. We aimed to estimate incidence and describe overall spectrum of infectious events, including all grade events, among HIV-1-infected adults failing first-line ART in Yaoundé, Cameroon. METHODS: All patients from Cameroon enrolled in the second-line ART 2LADY trial (ANRS12169) were included in this secondary analysis. Medical files were reviewed with predefined criteria for diagnosis assessment. Incidence rates (IR) were estimated per 100 person-years (% PY). RESULTS: A total of 302 adult patients contributing 840 PY experienced 596 infectious events (IR 71% PY). Only 29 (5%) events were graded as severe. Most frequent infections were upper respiratory tract infections (15% PY), diarrhoea (9% PY) and malaria (9% PY). A total of 369 (62%) infections occurred during the first year (IR 130% PY) followed by a persistent lower incidence during the following 3 years. Higher IR were observed in patients with CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm3 for all infectious events except for mycobacterial and parasitic infections. IR of viral, bacterial and parasitic infectious events were lower in case of co-trimoxazole use in patients with CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm3. CONCLUSIONS: Infectious events are common and mainly occur during the first year after treatment initiation. Second-line ART initiation had a positive impact on the entire spectrum of infectious morbidity.