RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic patterns of clinical symptoms in patients suspected to suffer from obstructive airway diseases (OADs) within different health care sectors. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Ten general practices (219 patients), one practice of pneumologists (259 patients) and one specialist hospital (300 patients). Sensitivities, specificities, positive (LR+), and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios of clinical symptoms were compared with lung function testing. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 21% had asthma. Sensitivities increased and specificities decreased from outpatient to hospital setting. The multivariate model of adjusted likelihood ratios for COPD showed LR+=4.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]=2.09-11.29) and LR-=0.07 (95% CI=0.01-0.43) of the combination "wheezing," "dyspnea when going upstairs," "smoking" in general practice. In hospital, the combination "dyspnea when going upstairs," "dyspnea during minimal exercise," and "smoking" showed LR+=3.34 (95% CI=2.08-5.31) and LR-=0.02 (95% CI=0.01-0.12). The combination "no coughing," "dyspnea attacks," and "no smoking" showed LR+=4.08 (95% CI=1.67-10.4) and LR-=0.24 (95% CI=0.12-0.58) for asthma in general practice. The combination "dyspnea attacks" and "no dyspnea when walking" showed LR+=6.48 (95% CI=1.01-40.94) and LR-=0.28 (95% CI=0.11-0.75) for asthma in hospital. CONCLUSION: Clinical decision rules for OAD need to be derived from original studies in their respective settings or assessed on their transferability to other settings.
Asunto(s)
Sector de Atención de Salud/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Asma/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Disnea/diagnóstico , Femenino , Medicina General/normas , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Especializados/normas , Hospitales Especializados/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumología/normas , Neumología/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of different computed tomographic (CT) reformation techniques in assessing the coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients undergoing both multi-detector row CT and invasive coronary angiography were consecutively included in a retrospective study. CT scans were obtained with collimation of 4 x 1 mm, pitch of 1.5, and rotation time of 500 msec. Retrospective electrocardiographic gating was used for image reconstruction, with 1.25-mm section thickness and 0.5-mm increment. The CT data set of each patient was evaluated by independent observers using transverse scanning, virtual endoscopic, and three-dimensional reformation and multiplanar reformation. RESULTS: Hemodynamically relevant stenoses (>50%) were detected with highest sensitivity at transverse scanning (58 of 79 [73.4%] stenoses), followed by virtual endoscopic (38 of 79 [48.1%] stenoses) and three-dimensional reformation (34 of 79 [43.0%] stenoses), and multiplanar reformation (37 of 79 [46.8%] stenoses). Atherosclerotic plaques were identified with comparable sensitivities at transverse scanning (143 of 218 plaques [65.6%]) and at three-dimensional (139 of 218 [63.8%] plaques) and virtual endoscopic reformation (136 of 218 [62.4%] plaques). Multiplanar reformation had distinctly poorer results (217 of 218 [58.3%] plaques). Combined interpretation with all four techniques increased sensitivity to 74.7% (59 of 79) for stenosis and 71.6% (156 of 218) for atherosclerosis. Calculated overall specificity was 91.4% or greater. Sufficient vascular evaluation was possible only in vessels larger than 1.6 mm in diameter. Thus, even in patients with heart rates below 60 bpm, only 80.0% of all coronary segments could be visualized, while at higher frequencies, visibility decreased to 66.2%. CONCLUSION: Although multi-detector row CT is a favorable alternative procedure in evaluating coronary arteries, its clinical value still is restricted to low heart rates and proximal coronary arterial segments.