Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Life (Basel) ; 14(8)2024 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39202684

RESUMEN

Significant gaps remain in the understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of fibromyalgia (FM), and the COVID-19 pandemic has introduced even more unknowns. Social factors specific to that period, the viral infection itself, and/or vaccination are additional elements that can complicate the progression of the disease or the response to treatment. Aim: The primary hypothesis to be evaluated in this study is that an acute COVID-19 infection, even when considered recovered, may induce changes in the response to non-pharmacological treatment in FM patients, particularly concerning pain. Results: We included 128 patients diagnosed with FM before the pandemic began. The patients were divided based on their history of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination status. All patients followed the same rehabilitation program (cognitive therapy, kinesitherapy). Perceived pain: The non-COVID-19 patient groups showed a statistically significant reduction in pain at the final evaluation compared to patients with a history of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (p < 0.001). Algometric evaluation: Patients without COVID-19 infection and that were vaccinated exhibited the best improvement in pain threshold, both across evaluation times (p < 0.001) and compared to any of the other three groups studied (p < 0.001). Using the WHYMPI questionnaire, the same group of patients (those not having experienced acute COVID-19 and who were vaccinated) was the only group with a statistically significant improvement in pain severity (p = 0.009). In conclusion, to control and improve FM pain symptoms, in addition to appropriate medication, we propose paying additional attention to the history of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccination status.

2.
Life (Basel) ; 14(5)2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792625

RESUMEN

Due to its variety of signs and symptoms, there have been numerous attempts to treat fibromyalgia (FM), but a cure has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a complex kinetic therapy program and a combined physical modality program on pain and other common symptoms of FM. Patients and methods: A total of 78 female patients were included in this study; 39 subjects underwent a kinesiotherapy (KT) intervention (combining aerobic and Pilates exercises), and 39 participated in a physical modality (PM) program (including electrotherapy (TENS and low-laser therapy) and thermotherapy). Results: Regarding the parameter of pain assessment, kinesiotherapy demonstrated its superiority both during the treatment period and in the evaluation 3 months after therapy cessation. Both in terms of patient-reported pain (inter-group comparisons: p = 0.000 at T3) and the examination of tender points (inter-group comparisons: p = 0.000 at T3), as well as the algometric assessment, pain was alleviated by the two forms of applied kinetic therapy. The observed functional impairment was statistically significantly influenced (p = 0.001) at the end of the kinetic program application, while for the perceived functional impairment, neither therapy proved superiority over the other at any point of evaluation (inter-group comparisons: p = 0.715 at T3). Regarding the influence of the emotional consequences implied by fibromyalgia, neither the forms of kinesiotherapy nor the chosen physical modalities proved superiority at any point of evaluation (HAQ anxiety inter-group comparisons: p = 0.000 at T3). In conclusion, even though kinesiotherapy had superior influences on fibromyalgia pain in the studied group, the current research lends credence to the significance of non-pharmacological therapy in managing fibromyalgia. Participants demonstrated positive advancements in subjective and objective pain assessments, as well as improvements in functional and emotional well-being.

3.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 16: 3151-3165, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37908341

RESUMEN

Background: In upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), admissions after normal working hours and during weekends may be associated with increased mortality. Aim: To assess the evolution of the after-hours and weekend effects during the COVID-19 pandemic as a result of progressive improved management despite management challenges during the pandemic. Methods: We performed an observational study of patients admitted for UGIB at a tertiary academic center between March 2020 and December 2021, compared to the corresponding timeframe before the pandemic. Admissions were assessed based on regular hours versus after-hours and weekdays versus weekends. We stratified patients based on demographic data, etiology, prognostic scores, the time between symptom onset and admission, as and between admission and endoscopy. The outcomes included mortality, rebleeding rate, the requirement for surgery and transfusion, and hospitalization days. Results: 802 cases were recorded during the pandemic, and 1006 cases before the pandemic. The overall mortality rate was 12.33%. Patients admitted after hours and during weekends had a higher mortality rate compared to those admitted during regular hours and weekdays (15.18% versus 10.22%, and 15.25% versus 11.16%), especially in cases of non-variceal bleeding. However, the difference in mortality rates was reduced by 2/3 during the pandemic, despite the challenges posed by COVID-19 infection. This suggests that there was an equalization effect of care in UGIB, regardless of the admission time. The differences observed in mortality rates for after-hours and weekend admissions seem to be primarily related to a higher proportion of patients who did not undergo endoscopy, while the proportion of severe cases remained similar. Blood requirements, hospital days, and rebleeding rate were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Admissions during weekends and after-hours have been associated with increased mortality, particularly in cases of non-variceal bleeding. However, the impact of this association was significantly reduced during the pandemic.

4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(7)2023 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37512035

RESUMEN

COVID-19 infection often produces cardiovascular complications, which can range from mild to severe and influence the overall prognosis. Imaging is the cornerstone for diagnosing initial COVID-19 cardiovascular involvement as well as treatment guidance. In this review, we present the current state of the literature on this subject while also emphasizing possible algorithms for indicating and executing these investigations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiopatías , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías/etiología , Imagen Multimodal/efectos adversos , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Pulmón , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA