RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Debriefing is a critical phase in simulation-based education that is extremely time-consuming for the instructors. The aim of the study was to assess whether a collective debriefing was non-inferior to an individual debriefing to improve learning outcomes after a simulation session. METHODS: This randomised controlled multicentre non-inferiority study included pairs comprising one resident and one student nurse in anaesthesia. Each pair underwent two sessions of a simulated life-threatening emergency held at a 6-week interval. Six participant pairs underwent simulation sessions every half-day of training. The debriefing performed after the first session was either individual (1 debriefing by pair; individual group) or collective (1 debriefing by 6 pairs; collective group). The primary outcome was the evolution of a 34-parameter technical skill score (Delta-TSS-34) between the two simulation sessions. The non-inferiority margin was 5. The change in the Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills score (Delta-ANTS), and the debriefing duration per participant pair were secondary endpoint measures. RESULTS: Respectively 23 and 21 pairs were included in the collective and individual groups. Delta-TSS-34 was non-inferior in the collective group compared to the individual group (mean intergroup difference [95% confidence interval]: 2.71 [0.44-4.98]). Delta-ANTS did not significantly differ between the two groups (median [interquartile range]: 22 [10-37] versus 25 [17-35], p = 0.57; respectively in the collective and individual groups). The debriefing duration per participant pair was significantly lower in the collective group (10 [10-11] min versus 27 [25-28] min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Collective debriefing was non-inferior to individual debriefing to improve learning outcomes after simulation of medical emergencies and allows a significant reduction in the time dedicated to the debriefing.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In humans as well as other animals, displays of body strength such as power postures or deep masculine voices are associated with prevalence in conflicts of interest and facilitated access to resources. We conduct here an ecological and highly critical test of this hypothesis in a domain that, on first thought, would appear to be shielded from such influences: access to emergency medical care. Using acoustic manipulations of vocal masculinity, we systematically varied the perceived level of physical dominance of mock patients calling a medical call center simulator. Callers whose voice were perceived as indicative of physical dominance (i.e. those with low fundamental and formant frequency voices) obtained a higher grade of response, a higher evaluation of medical emergency and longer attention from physicians than callers with strictly identical medical needs whose voice signaled lower physical dominance. Strikingly, while the effect was important for physician participants, it was virtually non-existent when calls were processed by non-medically-trained phone operators. This finding demonstrates an unprecedented degree of vulnerability of telephone-based medical decisions to extra-medical factors carried by vocal cues, and shows that it may not simply be assumed that more medical training will shield decisions from such influences.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) is a medical emergency requiring specific management, with the main aim of achieving reperfusion as quickly as possible. Guidelines from medical societies have defined optimal management, with proven efficacy on morbi-mortality. AIMS: Our study aimed to evaluate trends in practices between 2002 and 2010 in the emergency management of STEMI in a single French department, namely Cote d'Or. METHODS: All patients admitted with a first STEMI to one of the six participating coronary care units (private or public) in Cote d'Or since January 2001 were included in a prospective registry (obseRvatoire des Infarctus de Côte d'Or [RICO]). Based on these data, we analysed trends in prehospital times between 2002 and 2010. RESULTS: A total of 4114 patients were included in this analysis. Between 2002 and 2010, there was an increase in the proportion of patients who contacted the emergency services (by dialling 15) as first medical contact; however, the time from onset of symptoms to first medical contact remained stable over the study period. Overall, there was little change in prehospital management times but we noted a slight reduction in time to reperfusion. CONCLUSION: Despite some improvement in prehospital management practices between 2002 and 2010 in Cote d'Or, there is still significant room for improvement to achieve earlier reperfusion in STEMI patients.

Asunto(s)