RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has found a consensus in favor of conservative treatment for type II supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHF). This retrospective observational study compares the short- to medium-term functional outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment in 31 patients with SCHF (Gartland II and III) to assess the potential superiority of one approach over the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one pediatric patients treated for SCHF-19 classified as Gartland II and 12 as Gartland III-were assessed in our department. Eight patients underwent closed reduction and cast immobilization, 22 were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and one underwent open reduction and internal fixation with plates. Clinical and functional data were collected during follow-up, including elbow and forearm range of motion (ROM), grip strength, carrying angle, Flynn's criteria, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 3.3 years (± 1.4 years). All patients demonstrated good functional recovery. According to Flynn's criteria, 85% and 81% of the patients achieved a satisfactory outcome in elbow flexion and carrying angle, respectively. No cases of nerve injuries were reported. Four patients developed cubitus varus in the Gartland II group, which was treated with closed reduction and casting with the initial alignment maintained (without a loss of reduction during the first week). However, compared to this group that was conservatively treated, functional and clinical outcomes were significantly better in the group with SCHF Gartland II treated with reduction and pinning (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although some recent studies have demonstrated positive outcomes with conservative treatment for both Gartland IIA and IIB fractures, the short- to medium-term functional results in our study emphasize that superior outcomes were obtained with surgical treatment for Gartland II fractures when compared to those treated conservatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was obtained from our institute's ethics committee (registry no. 3511). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.

Asunto(s)

Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas del Húmero , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Preescolar , Moldes Quirúrgicos , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Adolescente , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fuerza de la Mano , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Articulación del Codo/fisiopatología , Reducción Cerrada/métodos , Reducción Abierta/métodos

RESUMEN

Snapping a knee related to a biceps femoris tendon subluxation is an uncommon syndrome that could be disabling in patients with high functional requirements such as athletes. We report a case of a 21-year-old soccer player with a painful left snapping biceps femoris tendon due to a varus trauma. He underwent knee arthroscopy and surgical exploration of the knee: the long head of the biceps femoris tendon was partially detached from his fibular insertion and there was a prominence on the fibular head. Reinsertion of the tendon and osteotomy of the fibular head allowed for resolution of all symptoms and the return to sport.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) represent surgical solutions in cases of valgus malalignment and isolated lateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical results, complications, and the overall postoperative alignment of a series of DFO and lateral UKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up in active middle-aged patients. METHODS: Patients with valgus knee and isolated lateral OA who underwent opening-wedge DFO or UKA from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Each patient was characterized by a joint line convergence angle (JLCA) > 3° and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) < 87°. We excluded patients who underwent meniscus or osteochondral allograft during DFO. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), complications, and postoperative alignment were assessed. Propensity score matching was used to identify comparable patients. RESULTS: The DFO and lateral UKA groups consisted of 29 patients each. No statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of follow-up, or limb deformity were reported between the two groups. In the DFO group, OKS was reported to improve from 27.51 to 38.59 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 51.14 to 67.2 (p < 0.05). Similarly, in the UKA group, OKS improved from 26.23 to 35.43 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 50.12 to 65.91 (p < 0.05). However, the improvement in OKS and KOOS (delta) did not differ between groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.95). The DFO and UKA groups were characterized by similar postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurements of -3.26 and -3.00, respectively (p = 0.65). No patients in the UKA group underwent revision or other knee surgeries during follow-up. No infections were detected in either group. In the DFO group, no cases of nonunion or delayed union were reported. However, 40% of DFO patients underwent plate removal. One patient in each group was characterized by progression of medial OA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade > 3. CONCLUSION: UKA and DFO represent an effective treatment in lateral knee OA with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity. Both surgeries were able to provide a significant and comparable clinical improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative retrospective cohort study.