RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Improved outcomes have been noted in patients undergoing malignant brain tumor resection at high-volume centers. Studies have arbitrarily chosen high-volume dichotomous cutoffs and have not evaluated volume-outcome associations at specific institutional procedural volumes. We sought to establish the continuous association of volume with patient outcomes and identify cutoffs significantly associated with mortality, major complications, and readmissions. We hypothesized that a linear volume-outcome relationship can estimate likelihood of adverse outcomes when comparing any two volumes. METHODS: The patient cohort was identified with ICD-10 coding in the Nationwide Readmissions Database(NRD). The association of volume and mortality, major complications, and 30-/90-day readmissions were evaluated in multivariate analyses. Volume was used as a continuous variable with two/three-piece splines, with various knot positions to reflect the best model performance, based on the Quasi Information Criterion(QIC). RESULTS: From 2016 to 2018, 34,486 patients with malignant brain tumors underwent resection. When volume was analyzed as a continuous variable, mortality risk decreased at a steady rate of OR 0.988 per each additional procedure increase for hospitals with 1-65 cases/year(95% CI 0.982-0.993, p < 0.0001). Risk of major complications decreased from 1 to 41 cases/year(OR 0.983, 95% CI 0.979-0.988, p < 0.0001), 30-day readmissions from 1 to 24 cases/year(OR 0.987, 95% CI 0.979-0.995, p = 0.001) and 90-day readmissions from 1 to 23 cases/year(OR 0.989, 95% CI 0.983-0.995, p = 0.0003) and 24-349 cases/year(OR 0.9994, 95% CI 0.999-1, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In multivariate analyses, institutional procedural volume remains linearly associated with mortality, major complications, and 30-/90-day readmission up to specific cutoffs. The resulting linear association can be used to calculate relative likelihood of adverse outcomes between any two volumes.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) invasion studies have focused on coding genes, while few studies evaluate long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), transcripts without protein-coding potential, for role in GBM invasion. We leveraged CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi) to evaluate invasive function of GBM-associated lncRNAs in an unbiased functional screen, characterizing and exploring the mechanism of identified candidates. METHODS: We implemented a CRISPRi lncRNA loss-of-function screen evaluating association of lncRNA knockdown (KD) with invasion capacity in Matrigel. Top screen candidates were validated using CRISPRi and oligonucleotide(ASO)-mediated knockdown in three tumor lines. Clinical relevance of candidates was assessed via The Cancer Genome Atlas(TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression(GTEx) survival analysis. Mediators of lncRNA effect were identified via differential expression analysis following lncRNA KD and assessed for tumor invasion using knockdown and rescue experiments. RESULTS: Forty-eight lncRNAs were significantly associated with 33-83% decrease in invasion (p<0.01) upon knockdown. The top candidate, LINC03045, identified from effect size and p-value, demonstrated 82.7% decrease in tumor cell invasion upon knockdown, while LINC03045 expression was significantly associated with patient survival and tumor grade(p<0.0001). RNAseq analysis of LINC03045 knockdown revealed that WASF3, previously implicated in tumor invasion studies, was highly correlated with lncRNA expression, while WASF3 KD was associated with significant decrease in invasion. Finally, WASF3 overexpression demonstrated rescue of invasive function lost with LINC03045 KD. CONCLUSION: CRISPRi screening identified LINC03045, a previously unannotated lncRNA, as critical to GBM invasion. Gene expression is significantly associated with tumor grade and survival. RNA-seq and mechanistic studies suggest that this novel lncRNA may regulate invasion via WASF3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A systematic review was conducted to investigate differences in incidence and primary origin of synchronous brain metastasis (sBM) in varying racial groups with different primary cancers. METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines a search was conducted using PubMed and Ovid databases for publications from January 2000 to January 2023, with search terms including combinations of "brain metastasis," "race," "ethnicity," and "incidence." Three independent reviewers screened for inclusion criteria encompassing studies clearly reporting primary cancer sites, patient demographics including race, and synchronous BM (sBM) incidence. RESULTS: Of 806 articles, 10 studies comprised of mainly adult patients from the United States met final inclusion for data analysis. Higher sBM incidence proportions were observed in American Indian/Alaska native patients for primary breast (p < 0.001), colorectal (p = 0.015), and esophageal cancers (p = 0.024) as well as in Asian or Pacific islanders for primary stomach (p < 0.001), thyroid (p = 0.006), and lung/bronchus cancers (p < 0.001) yet higher proportions in White patients for malignant melanoma (p < 0.001). Compared to White patients, Black patients had higher sBM incidence likelihood in breast cancer (OR = 1.27, p = 0.01) but lower likelihood in renal (OR = 0.46, p < 0.001) and esophageal cancers (OR = 0.31, p = 0.005). American Indian/Alaska native patients had a higher sBM likelihood (OR = 3.78, p = 0.004) relative to White patients in esophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal several comparative racial differences in sBM incidence arising from different primary cancer origins, underscoring a need for further research to explain these variations. Identifying the factors contributing to these disparities holds the potential to promote greater equity in oncological care according to cancer type.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 had massive effects on the healthcare system and multifactorial implications for the management of intensive care unit and cerebrovascular patients. This study aimed to assess the effect of COVID-19 on the outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to identify patients with nontraumatic SAH (ICD-10 code I60.x). Patients with nonaneurysmal cerebrovascular malformations or traumatic intracranial injuries were excluded. Only patients managed from April to December 2020 were included in the study given the availability of an ICD-10 code for COVID-19. Data on sociodemographic factors, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, NIS SAH Severity Score (NIS-SSS), surgical treatment, and death were acquired. Multivariable analysis was used to assess predictors of both surgical intervention and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In total, 6984 patients met the study criteria, 359 (5.1%) of whom had COVID-19. Those with COVID-19 were more likely to be younger and male and had a higher All Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups illness severity subclass, and NIS-SSS. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 were less likely to undergo surgery (10.0% vs 23.6%, OR 0.35, p < 0.0001) and had significantly higher mortality rates (48.2% vs 22.7%, p < 0.0001). When controlling for other variables, COVID-19 was an independent predictor of death (OR 1.67, p = 0.0002). Aneurysm surgery was performed in 1597 patients (317 open and 1280 endovascular procedures). There was no difference between the cohorts positive and negative for COVID-19 in terms of time to surgery or type of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 had significant impacts on patients with nontraumatic SAH. Specifically, patients with COVID-19 were significantly less likely to undergo surgery and had higher in-hospital mortality rates; however, for patients who did undergo procedural intervention, there was no significant difference in the type of intervention. Multiple factors, from medical acuity to healthcare system limitations, may contribute to these findings. Further retrospective research is needed to identify both specific causes of lower intervention rates and other potential nonaneurysmal causes of SAH in patients with COVID-19.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a state of decreased physiologic reserve associated with adverse treatment outcomes across surgical specialties. We sought to determine whether frailty affected patient outcomes after elective treatment (open microsurgical clipping or endovascular therapy [EVT]) of unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCAs). METHODS: The National Readmissions Database was queried from 2010 to 2014 to identify patients who had a known UCA and underwent elective clipping or EVT. Frailty was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator tool. Multivariable exact logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the associations between frailty and the primary outcome variables of 30- and 90-day readmissions, complications, length of stay (LOS), and patient disposition. RESULTS: Of 18,483 patients who underwent elective treatment for UCAs, 358 (1.9%) met the criteria for frailty. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-based factors, frailty (30-day: odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.17; P = 0.01; 90-day: OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05-2.06; P = 0.02) and clipping versus EVT (30-day: OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.85-2.43; P < 0.000; 90-day: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.59-2.03; P < 0.0001) were associated with increased readmission rates. Furthermore, frailty was associated with an increased rate of complications (surgical: OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.27-3.72; P < 0.0001; neurological: OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 2.43-3.81; P < 0.0001; major: OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.96-3.84; P < 0.0001), increased LOSs (incidence rate ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 2.59-3.66; P < 0.0001), and an increased rate of nonroutine disposition (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.91-5.34; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty was associated with an increased likelihood of 30- and 90-day readmissions after elective treatment of UCAs. Frailty was notably associated with several postoperative complications, longer LOSs, and nonroutine disposition in the treatment of UCAs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is associated with an annual stroke risk of 2%-5%, and revascularization with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can reduce this risk. While studies have demonstrated that hospital CEA volume is associated with mortality and myocardial infarction, CEA volume cutoffs in studies are relatively arbitrary, and no specific analyses on broad complications and discharge disposition have been performed. In this study, the authors systematically set out to identify a cutoff at which CEA procedural volume was significantly associated with major complications and nonroutine discharge. METHODS: Asymptomatic and symptomatic CAS patients undergoing CEA were retrospectively identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2010-2018). The association of CEA volume with outcomes was explored as a continuous variable using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing. The identified volume cutoff was used to generate dichotomous volume cohorts, and multivariate analyses of patient and hospital characteristics were conducted to evaluate the association of CEA volume with major complications and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2018, 308,933 asymptomatic and 32,877 symptomatic patients underwent CEA. Analysis of CEA volume with outcomes as a continuous variable demonstrated that an increase in volume was associated with a lower risk until a volume of approximately 7 cases per year (20th percentile). A total of 6702 (2.2%) asymptomatic and 1040 (3.2%) symptomatic patients were treated at the bottom 20% of hospital procedure volume. Increased rates of complications were seen at low-volume centers among asymptomatic (3.66% vs 2.77%) and symptomatic (7.4% vs 6.87%) patients. Asymptomatic patients treated at low-volume centers had an increased likelihood of major complications (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; p = 0.007) and nonroutine discharge (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.24-1.50; p < 0.0001). Symptomatic patients treated at low-volume centers were also more likely to experience major complications (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.02; p = 0.02) and nonroutine discharge (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.47; p = 0.005). Mortality rates were similar between low- and high-volume hospitals among asymptomatic (0.36% and 0.32%, respectively) and symptomatic (1.06% and 1.49%, respectively) patients, while volume was not significantly associated with mortality among asymptomatic (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.67-1.65; p = 0.81) and symptomatic (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43-1.54; p = 0.52) patients in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: CEA patients, asymptomatic or symptomatic, are at a higher risk of major complications and nonroutine discharge at low-volume centers. Analysis of CEA as a continuous variable demonstrated a cutoff at 7 cases per year, and further study may identify factors associated with improved outcome at the lowest-volume centers.

RESUMEN

Introduction: 1.5 Tesla (1.5T) remain a significant field strength for brain imaging worldwide. Recent computer simulations and clinical studies at 3T MRI have suggested that dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI using a 30° flip angle ("low-FA") with model-based leakage correction and no gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) preload provides equivalent relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements to the reference-standard acquisition using a single-dose GBCA preload with a 60° flip angle ("intermediate-FA") and model-based leakage correction. However, it remains unclear whether this holds true at 1.5T. The purpose of this study was to test this at 1.5T in human high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. Methods: This was a single-institution cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone 1.5T MRI for HGG. DSC-MRI consisted of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) with a low-FA without preload (30°/P-); this then subsequently served as a preload for the standard intermediate-FA acquisition (60°/P+). Both normalized (nrCBV) and standardized relative cerebral blood volumes (srCBV) were calculated using model-based leakage correction (C+) with IBNeuro™ software. Whole-enhancing lesion mean and median nrCBV and srCBV from the low- and intermediate-FA methods were compared using the Pearson's, Spearman's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Twenty-three HGG patients composing a total of 31 scans were analyzed. The Pearson and Spearman correlations and ICCs between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ acquisitions demonstrated high correlations for both mean and median nrCBV and srCBV. Conclusion: Our study provides preliminary evidence that for HGG patients at 1.5T MRI, a low FA, no preload DSC-MRI acquisition can be an appealing alternative to the reference standard higher FA acquisition that utilizes a preload.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions to healthcare systems around the world, due to both high resource utilization and concern for disease spread. Delays in non-emergent surgeries have also affected chronic disease management, including that of benign brain tumors such as meningiomas and pituitary adenomas. To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 infection on benign brain tumor resection rates and subsequent perioperative and inpatient outcomes, this study utilized the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to investigate rates of surgical resection, time to surgery, and mortality among benign brain tumor patients with and without COVID-19. METHODS: Patient data from April 2020 to December 2020 was extracted from the NIS. Confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis was identified using the ICD-10 diagnosis code U07.1. Patients with benign neoplasms of the cerebral meninges, cranial nerves, pituitary gland, craniopharyngeal duct, and brain were included in the study. Patient socio-demographics, hospital characteristics, and clinical comorbidities were obtained. Outcome variables included rates of surgical resection, time to surgery, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: The study analysis consisted of 13,053 patients with benign intracranial neoplasms who met inclusion criteria; 597 (4.6%) patients were COVID-19 positive. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to be older and male than COVID-19 negative patients. Patients with COVID-19 had increased overall likelihood of mortality (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.72-3.25, p < 0.0001). Even when controlling for sociodemographic/hospital factors and comorbidities, COVID-19 positive patients had a significantly longer time to surgery (8.7 days vs. 0.9 days, p < 0.0001) than COVID negative patients, and were associated with a decreased likelihood of undergoing surgery on index admission overall (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10-0.29, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, COVID-19 infection was associated with worse inpatient outcomes in effectively all measured categories, including longer time to surgery, decreased likelihood of receiving surgery on index admission, and increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality. These findings emphasize the effect that COVID-19 has on other aspects of patient care and highlight the importance of appropriate avenues of care for patients who are COVID-19 positive. Although the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer a public health emergency, understanding the pandemic's impact on outcome for these patients is essential in efficient triage and optimizing treatment for these patients in the future. Further study is needed to elucidate causal relationships on the outcomes of benign brain tumor patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has had innumerable impacts on the healthcare system, both by worsening patient illness and impeding effective and efficient care. Further, COVID-19 has been tied to increased rates of ischemic stroke, particularly among young patients. We utilized a national database to assess associations of COVID-19 with thrombectomy rates, mortality, and discharge disposition among stroke patients. METHODS: Patients were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS, 2020). Inclusion criteria selected for adult ischemic stroke patients; those with venous thrombosis or unspecified cerebral infarction were excluded. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of COVID-19 diagnosis. Outcome variables included mechanical thrombectomy, in-hospital mortality, and discharge disposition. Additional patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and disease severity metrics were collected. Statistical analysis was performed via multivariable logistic regression and log-binary regression. RESULTS: 54,368 patients were included in the study; 2116 (3.89%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. COVID-19 was associated with lower rates of mechanical thrombectomy (OR 0.94, p < 0.0001), higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.14, p < 0.0001), and unfavorable discharge disposition (OR 1.08, p < 0.0001), even when controlling for illness severity. Other relationships, such as a male predominance among stroke patients with COVID-19, were also identified. CONCLUSION: This study identified a relationship between COVID-19 diagnosis and worse outcomes for each metric assessed, including mechanical thrombectomy rates, in-hospital mortality, and discharge disposition. Several factors might underly this, ranging from systemic/multisystem inflammation and worsened disease severity to logistical barriers to treatment caused by COVID-19. Further research is needed to determine causality of these findings.

RESUMEN

Background: The global coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in procedural delays around the world; however, timely and aggressive surgical resection for malignant brain tumor patients is essential for outcome optimization. To investigate the association between COVID-19 and outcomes of these patients, we queried the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for differences in rates of surgical resection, time to surgery, mortality, and discharge disposition between patients with and without confirmed COVID-19 infection. Methods: Patient data were taken from the NIS from April 2020 to December 2020. COVID-19 diagnosis was determined with the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code U07.1. Results: A total of 30,671 malignant brain tumor patients met inclusion criteria and 738 (2.4%) patients had a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19-positive patients had lower likelihood of receiving surgery (Odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.63, P < 0.0001), increased likelihood of mortality (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.78-2.66, P < 0.0001), and increased likelihood of non-routine discharge (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.39, P < 0.0001). Notably, COVID patients receiving surgery were not associated with surgical delay (P = 0.17). Conclusion: COVID-19 infection was associated with worse patient outcome in malignant brain tumor patients, including decreased likelihood of receiving surgery, increased likelihood of mortality, and increased likelihood of non-routine discharge. Our study highlights the need to balance the risks and benefits of delaying surgery for malignant brain tumor patients with COVID-19. Although the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer a public health emergency, understanding the pandemic's impact on outcome provides important insight in effective triage for these patients in the situations where resources are limited.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for operative brain metastasis (BrM) is usually administered 1 to 6 weeks after resection. Preoperative versus postoperative timing of SRS delivery related to surgery remains a critical question, as a pattern of failure is the development of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) in as many as 35% of patients who undergo postoperative SRS or the occurrence of radiation necrosis. As they await level I clinical data from ongoing trials, the authors aimed to bridge the gap by comparing postoperative with simulated preoperative single-fraction SRS dosimetry plans for patients with surgically resected BrM. METHODS: The authors queried their institutional database to retrospectively identify patients who underwent postoperative Gamma Knife SRS (GKSRS) after resection of BrM between January 2014 and January 2021. Exclusion criteria were prior radiation delivered to the lesion, age < 18 years, and prior diagnosis of LMD. Once identified, a simulated preoperative SRS plan was designed to treat the unresected BrM and compared with the standard postoperative treatment delivered to the resection cavity per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 90-05 guidelines. Numerous comparisons between preoperative and postoperative GKSRS treatment parameters were then made using paired statistical analyses. RESULTS: The authors' cohort included 45 patients with a median age of 59 years who were treated with GKSRS after resection of a BrM. Primary cancer origins included colorectal cancer (27%), non-small cell lung cancer (22%), breast cancer (11%), melanoma (11%), and others (29%). The mean tumor and cavity volumes were 15.06 cm3 and 12.61 cm3, respectively. In a paired comparison, there was no significant difference in the planned treatment volumes between the two groups. When the authors compared the volume of surrounding brain that received 12 Gy or more (V12Gy), an important predictor of radiation necrosis, 64% of patient plans in the postoperative SRS group (29/45, p = 0.008) recorded greater V12 volumes. Preoperative plans were more conformal (p < 0.001) and exhibited sharper dose drop-off at the lesion margins (p = 0.0018) when compared with postoperative plans. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of simulated preoperative and delivered postoperative SRS plans administered to the BrM or resection cavity suggested that preoperative SRS allows for more highly conformal lesional coverage and sharper dose drop-off compared with postoperative plans. Furthermore, V12Gy was lower in the presurgical GKSRS plans, which may account for the decreased incidence of radiation necrosis seen in prior retrospective studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced glioblastoma (GBM) in patients previously treated for craniopharyngioma is a rare phenomenon. To the authors' knowledge, only seven cases have previously been documented in the literature. OBSERVATIONS: Herein, the authors report a case of a patient presenting with a new diagnosis of multifocal GBM 15 years after having received adjuvant radiotherapy for a craniopharyngioma. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an extensive enhancing infiltrative lesion in the right frontal lobe as well as two satellite lesions in the contralateral frontal lobe. Histopathology on biopsy was consistent with GBM. LESSONS: Even though this case is rare, it is nevertheless important to recognize GBM as a potential side effect of radiation. Long-term follow-up in postradiation craniopharyngioma patients is crucial for early detection.

RESUMEN

Endovascular carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a common treatment for carotid artery stenosis and stroke prevention. Previous studies have shown that high procedural volume centers are associated with improved patient outcomes. Unplanned 30-day readmissions, which are associated with significant expenses, are increasingly used as a metric of patient outcome. Despite prior studies evaluating associations between procedural volume and multiple outcomes, the association between very high CAS volume and short-term (30-day) readmission has not yet been evaluated in a large multicenter study. The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed retrospectively from 2010 to 2015 to evaluate the association between hospital procedural volume and patient outcomes in asymptomatic and symptomatic CAS patients. Very high volume centers (VHVC) were defined as the top 10% hospitals in terms of procedural volume, performing >= 79 procedures a year. Univariate and multivariate analyses of patient and hospital characteristics evaluated associations with short-term (30-day) readmissions (SR), long-term (90-day) readmissions (LR), index mortality, discharge disposition, major complications, and neurological complications. A total of 36,128 asymptomatic patients and 8,390 symptomatic patients who underwent CAS were identified. Asymptomatic CAS patients treated at VHVCs were associated with decreased likelihood of SR (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.95, p = 0.003) and LR (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, p = 0.037) compared to asymptomatic patients at non-VHVCs. There was no significant difference in SR or LR between symptomatic CAS patients treated at a VHVC vs. non-VHVC. Our findings provide additional evidence to support the role of experience in improved CAS treatment outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric primary brain tumors are the leading cause of death among childhood cancers. Guidelines recommend specialized care with a multidisciplinary team and focused treatment protocols to optimize outcomes in this patient population. Furthermore, readmission is a key metric of patient outcomes and has been used to inform reimbursement. However, no prior study has analyzed national database-level records to evaluate the role of care in a designated children's hospital following pediatric tumor resection and its impact on readmission rates. The goal of this study was to investigate whether treatment at a children's hospital rather than a nonchildren's hospital has a significant effect on outcome. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database records from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively to evaluate the effect of hospital designation on patient outcomes after craniotomy for brain tumor resection, and results are reported as national estimates. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of patient and hospital characteristics were conducted to evaluate if craniotomy for tumor resection at a designated children's hospital was independently associated with 30-day readmissions, mortality rate, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 4003 patients who underwent craniotomy for tumor resection were identified using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, with 1258 of these cases (31.4%) treated at children's hospitals. Patients treated at children's hospitals were associated with decreased likelihood of 30-day hospital readmission (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97, p = 0.036) compared to patients treated at nonchildren's hospitals. There was no significant difference in index mortality between patients treated at children's hospitals and those treated at nonchildren's hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection at children's hospitals were associated with decreased rates of 30-day readmission, with no significant difference in index mortality. Future prospective studies may be warranted to confirm this association and identify components contributing to improved outcomes in care at children's hospitals.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Postnatal repair for myelomeningocele (MMC) is a time-sensitive and technically challenging procedure. More experienced hospitals may provide improved outcomes for the complexity of care associated with these patients. No prior study has investigated the impact of MMC treatment at pediatric hospitals. The authors sought to examine the effect of pediatric hospital designation on patients undergoing postnatal MMC repair to identify factors associated with maximizing improved patient outcomes. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database records from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively to determine the effect of hospital designation on patient outcomes after postnatal MMC repair. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of patient and hospital characteristics were conducted to evaluate if MMC repair at a designated pediatric hospital was independently associated with patient outcomes of perinatal infection rates, discharge disposition, and length of stay. RESULTS: Of the total of 6353 pediatric patients who underwent postnatal MMC repair between 2010 and 2018, 2224 (35.0%) received care at a pediatric hospital. Those with an extreme level of disease burden as defined by the all patient refined diagnosis-related group severity of illness index were more likely to be treated at a pediatric hospital (p = 0.03). Patients undergoing repair at a pediatric hospital were also associated with a decreased likelihood of perinatal infection (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83, p = 0.005); greater likelihood of routine disposition (OR 4.85, 95% CI 2.34-10.06, p < 0.0001); and shorter length of stay (incidence rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.995, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients requiring intervention for postnatal repair of MMC may benefit from the multidisciplinary subspeciality care offered at pediatric hospitals. The authors found that postnatal repair of MMC at pediatric hospitals was associated with a greater likelihood of improved patient outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Multiple prior studies have shown a relationship between COVID-19 and strokes; further, COVID-19 has been shown to influence both time-to-thrombectomy and overall thrombectomy rates. Using large-scale, recently released national data, we assessed the association between COVID-19 diagnosis and patient outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in this study were identified from the 2020 National Inpatient Sample. All patients with arterial strokes undergoing mechanical thrombectomy were identified using ICD-10 coding criteria. Patients were further stratified by COVID diagnosis (positive vs. negative). Other covariates, including patient/hospital demographics, disease severity, and comorbidities were collected. Multivariable analysis was used to determine the independent effect of COVID-19 on in-hospital mortality and unfavorable discharge. RESULTS: 5078 patients were identified in this study; 166 (3.3%) were COVID-19 positive. COVID-19 patients had a significantly higher mortality rate (30.1% vs. 12.4%, p < 0.001). When controlling for patient/hospital characteristics, APR-DRG disease severity, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, COVID-19 was an independent predictor of increased mortality (OR 1.13, p = 0.002). COVID-19 was not significantly related to discharge disposition (p = 0.480). Older age and increased APR-DRG disease severity were also correlated with increase morality. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study indicates that COVID-19 is a predictor of mortality among mechanical thrombectomy. This finding is likely multifactorial but may be related to multisystem inflammation, hypercoagulability, and re-occlusion seen in COVID-19 patients. Further research would be needed to clarify these relationships.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine (1) whether obstetrical patients were more likely to be admitted from the emergency department (ED) for influenza compared with nonpregnant women, and (2) require critical care interventions once admitted. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the 2006 to 2011 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, ED encounters for influenza for women aged 15 to 54 years without underlying chronic medical conditions were identified. Women were categorized as pregnant or nonpregnant using billing codes. Multivariable log linear models were fit to evaluate the relative risk of admission from the ED and the risk of intensive care unit (ICU)-level interventions including mechanical ventilation and central monitoring with pregnancy status as the exposure of interest. Measures of association were described with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We identified 15.9 million ED encounters for influenza of which 4% occurred among pregnant women. Pregnant patients with influenza were nearly three times as likely to be admitted as nonpregnant patients (aRR = 2.99, 95% CI: 2.94, 3.05). Once admitted, obstetric patients were at 72% higher risk of ICU-level interventions (aRR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.61, 1.84). Of pregnant women admitted from the ED, 9.3% required ICU-level interventions such as mechanical ventilation or central monitoring. Older patients and those with Medicare were also at high risk of admission and ICU-level interventions (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy confers three times the risk of admission from the ED for influenza and pregnant women are significantly more likely to require ICU-level medical interventions compared with women of similar age. These findings confirm the significant disease burden from influenza in the obstetric population and the public health importance of reducing infection risk. KEY POINTS: · Pregnancy confers three times the risk of admission from the ED for influenza.. · Pregnant women admitted with influenza are significantly more likely to require ICU-level care.. · Influenza represents a significant disease burden in the obstetric population.

Asunto(s)