RESUMEN

This review summarises preclinical and clinical data on effects of endogenous and exogenous estrogens on probability of breast cancer diagnosis, and on the course and efficacy of breast cancer therapies. The data indicate that higher endogenous estrogen exposure (e.g. pregnancy, early menarche and late menopause, estrogen levels in future breast cancer patients, obesity) or exogenous estrogens (oral contraceptives; hormone replacement therapies) may be associated with an increased probability of breast cancer diagnosis. However, there is little evidence that estrogens have deleterious effects on the course of breast cancer. Moreover, increased incidence of breast cancer diagnosis after prolonged hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use seems to be associated with clinically less advanced disease. In studies assessing both diagnosis and mortality, HRT is frequently associated with reduced mortality compared to never users. The interaction of progestagens and estrogens on the probability of breast cancer diagnosis is complex and dependent on type of progestagens and regimens employed. Efficacy of current treatment modalities for breast cancer (surgery, irradiation, adjuvant therapy or chemotherapy) is not negatively influenced by estrogens at concentrations considerably higher than those attained with current HRT preparations. Although it cannot be excluded that estrogens increase the probability of breast cancer diagnosis, available data fail to demonstrate that, once breast cancer has been diagnosed, estrogens worsen prognosis, accelerate the course of the disease, reduce survival or interfere with the management of breast cancer. It may therefore be concluded that the prevalent opinion that estrogens and estrogen treatment are deleterious for breast cancer, needs to be revisited. However, results of ongoing prospective, randomised clinical trials with different HRT regimens in healthy women or breast cancer survivors are needed to provide more definite conclusions about risks and benefits of HRT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: As an aid to discrimination of sufferers with back pain an artificial intelligence neural network was constructed to differentiate paraspinal power spectra. DESIGN: Clinical investigation using surface electromyography. METHOD: The surface electromyogram power spectra from 60 subjects, 33 non-back-pain sufferers and 27 chronic back pain sufferers were used to construct a back propagation neural network that was then tested. Subjects were placed on a test frame in 30 degrees of lumbar forward flexion. An isometric load of two-thirds maximum voluntary contraction was held constant for 30 s whilst surface electromyograms were recorded at the level of the L(4-5). Paraspinal power spectra were calculated and loaded into the input layer of a three-layer back propagation network. The neural network classified the spectra into normal or back pain type. RESULTS: The back propagation neural was shown to have satisfactory convergence with a specificity of 79% and a sensitivity of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence neural networks appear to be a useful method of differentiating paraspinal power spectra in back-pain sufferers.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The changes in haemostasis during oral contraception are related to the ethinylestradiol dose present in the formulation taken by the patient. An open, randomized longitudinal study was performed to evaluate and compare the effects that low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs) containing different doses of ethinylestradiol exert on the haemostatic system. Eighty-nine healthy women, aged 18-45 years, were randomly assigned to treatment with 3 different OCs: a monophasic pill containing 30 micrograms of ethinylestradiol plus 75 micrograms of gestodene (GSD/30) (30 subjects), a triphasic pill containing levonorgestrel (TRI/LNG) (28 subjects), a monophasic pill containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus 150 micrograms of desogestrel (DOG/20) (31 subjects). From every woman, blood samples were collected before treatment and at the 3rd and 6th cycle of pill intake. The number of platelets significantly increased (p less than 0.01) during treatment with TRI/LNG. Fibrinogen plasma values were significantly increased (p less than 0.05) only in women treated with the preparation GSD/30. Fibrinopeptide A (FPA) plasma levels significantly increased (p less than 0.01) during treatment with the pills TRI/LNG and GSD/30, but the levels of FPA were unchanged in the group treated with DOG/20. The overall results of this study confirm that the effects of OCs on haemostasis are dependent on the ethinylestradiol dose. Moreover, they suggest that with reduction of the ethinylestradiol component to 20 micrograms, the effects of OCs on haemostasis seem to be virtually eliminated.

Asunto(s)