RESUMEN
AIMS: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death. Anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are underappreciated symptoms. We aimed to systematically synthesize prevalence estimates of mood disorders and symptom severities, pre- and post-ICD insertions. Comparisons were made with control groups, as well as within ICD patients by indication (primary vs. secondary), sex, shock status, and over time. METHODS: Databases (Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase) were searched without limits from inception to 31 August 2022; 4661 articles were identified, 109 (39 954 patients) of which met criteria. RESULTS: Random-effects meta-analyses revealed clinically relevant anxiety in 22.58% (95%CI 18.26-26.91%) of ICD patients across all timepoints following insertion and depression in 15.42% (95%CI 11.90-18.94%). Post-traumatic stress disorder was seen in 12.43% (95%CI 6.90-17.96%). Rates did not vary relative to indication group. Clinically relevant anxiety and depression were more likely in ICD patients who experienced shocks [anxiety odds ratio (OR) = 3.92 (95%CI 1.67-9.19); depression OR = 1.87 (95%CI 1.34-2.59)]. Higher symptoms of anxiety were seen in females than males post-insertion [Hedges' g = 0.39 (95%CI 0.15-0.62)]. Depression symptoms decreased in the first 5 months post-insertion [Hedges' g = 0.13 (95%CI 0.03-0.23)] and anxiety symptoms after 6 months [Hedges' g = 0.07 (95%CI 0-0.14)]. CONCLUSION: Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent in ICD patients, especially in those who experience shocks. Of particular concern is the prevalence of PTSD following ICD implantation. Psychological assessment, monitoring, and therapy should be offered to ICD patients and their partners as part of routine care.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Femenino , Masculino , Humanos , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Oportunidad RelativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common neurocognitive disorder in hospitalised older adults with vast negative consequences. The predominant method of subtyping delirium is by motor activity profile into hypoactive, hyperactive and mixed groups. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated how predisposing factors differ between delirium motor subtypes. METHODS: Databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase) were systematically searched for studies reporting predisposing factors (prior to delirium) for delirium motor subtypes. A total of 61 studies met inclusion criteria (N = 14,407, mean age 73.63 years). Random-effects meta-analyses synthesised differences between delirium motor subtypes relative to 22 factors. RESULTS: Hypoactive cases were older, had poorer cognition and higher physical risk scores than hyperactive cases and were more likely to be women, living in care homes, taking more medications, with worse functional performance and history of cerebrovascular disease than all remaining subtypes. Hyperactive cases were younger than hypoactive and mixed subtypes and were more likely to be men, with better cognition and lower physical risk scores than all other subtypes. Those with no motor subtype (unable to be classified) were more likely to be women and have better functional performance. Effect sizes were small. CONCLUSIONS: Important differences in those who develop motor subtypes of delirium were shown prior to delirium occurrence. We provide robust quantitative evidence for a common clinical assumption that indices of frailty (institutional living, cognitive and functional impairment) are seen more in hypoactive patients. Motor subtypes should be measured across delirium research. Motor subtyping has great potential to improve the clinical risk assessment and management of delirium.