RESUMEN
Background: Schizophrenia is a complex, chronic mental health disorder that confers a substantial disease burden globally. Oral antipsychotic treatments (OATs) are the mainstay for treating early and advanced stages of schizophrenia. Our systematic review aimed to synthesize literature describing real-world effectiveness, economic, and humanistic outcomes of OATs (asenapine, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, iloperidone, lumateperone, lurasidone, olanzapine/samidorphan, paliperidone, and quetiapine) for successful management of the disease. Methods: PubMed, American Psychological Association PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting real-world effectiveness, costs, humanistic, behavioral (eg, interpersonal relations, suicide ideation), medication adherence, and product-switching outcomes for selected OATs published in English from January 2010 to March 2022 were identified and evaluated qualitatively. Results: We included 48 studies with different designs providing extensive evidence on schizophrenia. All studies were conducted in countries outside of the United States. In most studies, antipsychotic medications were more effective than placebo, suggesting their value in the management of schizophrenia. Sixteen studies measured the economic outcomes of OATs. Eight studies assessed humanistic outcomes, while one reported behavioral outcomes in three second-generation antipsychotics. Medication adherence was described in two studies, while five studies evaluated product switching. Non-adherence was commonly reported for OATs. Medication non-adherence and treatment discontinuation were predominant factors contributing to the economic burden of schizophrenia. Conclusion: Our research showcased a significant knowledge gap across OATs spanning the humanistic and behavioral outcomes and medication adherence and switching, suggesting a need for robust evidence generation to help clinicians and payers make informed decisions regarding treatment opportunities and cost-effective strategies for patients with schizophrenia.
RESUMEN
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by a complete deficiency in insulin due to the destruction of pancreatic beta cells. Globally, T1D accounts for nearly 5-10% of the total diabetes cases. Living with this life-long condition has a significant emotional, psychological, physical, mental, and social impact. Despite extensive research characterizing the underlying physiology of T1D, additional work is needed to address the psychosocial aspects associated with the condition and its effect on the quality of life (QoL) of people living with T1D. One area that warrants further exploration is the stigma-related stereotypes and prejudice of people living with T1D experience in real-life settings. Despite the acknowledgment of stigma for conditions such as obesity, mental illness, and epilepsy, its association with T1D and ensuing psychological distress remains relatively under-investigated. Health-related stigma is a huge barrier to seeking appropriate, timely support for enhanced healthcare management and engagement in such patients. Here, we provide the perspectives of an adult with over 33 years of living with T1D and an expert endocrinologist who details their experience of T1D-related stigma. The self-reported factors explored by the person living with T1D include (but are not limited to) blame, mockery of the condition/person, diabetes-related shame, exclusion, rejection, negative judgments, fear, stereotyping, and discrimination. The lived experience supported by the clinical insights of the endocrinologist highlights the urgent need to decipher the severity, extent, nature, determinants, and consequences of stigma faced by a person living with T1D. Raising societal awareness, increasing education for caregivers, access to counseling for people living with diabetes, and engaging in shared decision-making remain the path forward.
RESUMEN
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic autoimmune disease that impacts blood glucose levels and can also lead to an increased prevalence of psychiatric conditions. Living with T1DM has been associated with a significant impact on a person's social, mental, and psychological quality of life (QoL). Stressors related to T1DM include the demands of managing the condition, acceptance of the diagnosis, and recognition of the sizeable personal responsibility involved in managing the condition. Participating in treatment designed to improve QoL can still take a psychological toll on individuals with T1DM and can lead to a wide range of psychological distress, including anxiety, fear, depression, stress, anger, frustration, and denial (among many others). Ongoing research seeks to investigate the range of psychiatric conditions that are common among people with T1DM. Bringing patient perspectives into research to design and implement workable solutions is the future of a novel holistic approach to managing T1DM-related mental health impact. Connecting with other people living with T1DM, clinicians, counselors/therapists, mental health professionals, and social workers might alleviate some of the challenges of managing the emotional issues and psychological distress associated with T1DM. Here, we provide the perspective of someone with over 33 years of living with T1DM, its impact on his mental health, QoL, the steps undertaken, and the path to successful management. This perspective is complemented by opinions from two expert clinicians-an endocrinologist and a psychiatrist. Sharing the real-life subjective burden experienced by the person living with diabetes could be one step towards increasing awareness of the toll of mental health disorders on people living with T1DM. This patient experience, complemented by expert endocrinologist and psychiatrist opinions, could pave the way for an effective two-way dialogue to manage the condition effectively.