RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the performance of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI) in a sample of Black and White caregivers of persons living with dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on 153 dyads enrolled in the Care Ecosystem dementia care management program were analyzed, including sociodemographic variables, dementia severity, and caregiver burden and wellbeing. Factor structure, item-response patterns, and concurrent validity were assessed across racial groups. RESULTS: Differences between Black and White caregivers included gender, dyad relation, and socioeconomic disadvantage. Factor structure and item loadings varied by racial cohort, with parameters supporting a 3-factor model. For Black caregivers, finances and work, emotional and physical strain, and family and personal adjustment items loaded together on individual factors. For White caregivers physical and emotional strain items loaded on separate factors, although personal and family adjustment items loaded with work and financial strain items. Item-level analysis revealed differences between groups, with Black caregivers endorsing physical strain to a greater degree (p = .003). Total MCSI scores were positively correlated with concurrent measures like the PHQ-9 (White: r = 0.67, Black: r = 0.54) and the GAD-2 (White: r = 0.47, Black: r = 0.4), and negatively correlated with self-efficacy ratings (White: r = -0.54, Black: r = -0.55), with a p < .001 for all validity analysis. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The MCSI displayed acceptable statistical performance for Black and White caregivers of persons living with dementia and displayed a factor structure sensitive to cultural variations of the construct. Researchers results highlight the inherent complexity and the relevance of selecting inclusive measures to appropriately serve diverse populations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial differences in healthcare utilization and caregiver burden in a culturally diverse population of older adults with dementia. METHOD: One hundred and thirty-three dyads (person with dementia, PWD and caregiver, CG), with at least one emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization 12 months prior, were enrolled. Independent sample t-tests and chi-squared analyses were performed to compare racial groups on healthcare utilization and CG burden. Mann-Whitney U test was used for item-level analyses, principal component analysis was used to examine relationships among outcomes, and regressions were used to identify the relationship between race and potential covariates. RESULTS: PWD sample mean age was 79 years, predominantly female, and with high school education. Racial distribution was 65% White and 35% Black. CG sample mean age was 64 years, predominantly female, with more than 12 years of education. No differences were found for age or dementia severity across racial groups. Black PWD experienced more ED and ambulance utilization when compared to White counterparts. Non-emergency hospitalization rates were higher for White PWD. No significant differences were found by race for CG burden total score; however, item-level analysis suggested more anger, reduced social life, uncertainty, and inadequacy in White CGs. Regressions demonstrated a positive relationship between Black race and adult-child CGs with increased ED visits, while dyad educational attainment was associated with hospitalizations independent of race. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare utilization disparities extend to older adults with dementia diagnoses. Our findings suggest that culturally tailored interventions may be appropriate. Future research is encouraged to explore the effect of other covariates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: Appropriate normative data are crucial for competent neuropsychological assessment. Although individuals with psychiatric illness often perform more poorly than healthy adults on neuropsychological testing, data that reflect the psychiatric population are often lacking. We present a normative dataset and calculation tools for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT) derived from the psychiatric inpatient population. Method: A sample of 301 psychiatric inpatients completed the RCFT and the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) between 1999 and 2018. Participants were 59.5% male, 82.1% Caucasian, 13.3% black, and 4.6% identified as another racial demographic, largely consistent with recent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2018) data for inpatients in U.S. psychiatric facilities. Scores for RCFT Copy, Short-Delay Free Recall, Long-Delay Free Recall, Total Recognition, and Percent Retained were modeled via multiple regression with age and education as predictors. Base rates were computed for subscores comprising Total Recognition to aid clinical decision making. Results: Age and education served as significant individual predictors for all models except one model predicting percent retained across delay that included only age. Regression equations and regression standard errors were used to produce a score calculator using a commonly available spreadsheet software package. Healthy adult norms under-estimated performance in our sample, underscoring the importance of these normative data. Conclusions: These normative data for the RCFT represent a large cohort of psychiatric inpatients. For clinical practice and research, both the data and the tools provided are likely to be of particular usefulness among individuals with serious mental illness.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The aim of the current study was to examine the acceptability and feasibility of a multicomponent care management program in older adults with advanced dementia in a long-term memory care unit. Eighteen older adults with moderate to severe dementia were asked to wear an activity monitor (Fitbit Charge 2 HR) and participate in a once monthly telehealth intervention via iPads over a 6-month period. Activity monitor data were used to assess compliance. Acceptability was assessed through qualitative interviews conducted with the caregiving staff on the memory unit. The care management program was acceptable to residents and their caregivers. Results indicated that the care management program is feasible in older adults with advanced dementia although activity monitor adherence was better during the day than at night. Telehealth session compliance was excellent throughout the study. A long-term multicomponent dementia care program is acceptable and feasible in individuals with advanced dementia. Future studies should aim to evaluate whether data received from activity monitors can be used in a dementia care intervention program.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A paucity of peer-reviewed research exists regarding the relation between cognitive functioning and adjudicative competence, despite increasing awareness of cognitive deficits associated with serious mental illness. This retrospective study sought to add to and expand upon existing research by considering performance validity and court determinations of competence, when available. METHOD: We compared demographic and cognitive variables of a group of defendants with presumed valid testing admitted to an inpatient psychiatric facility for evaluation of adjudicative competence and referred for neuropsychological evaluation (n = 45) and compared individuals determined by the evaluator and/or the court to be competent (n = 30) and incompetent (n = 15). RESULTS: Defendants who were incompetent were more likely to be diagnosed with a cognitive disorder, with a medium effect size. There was a difference in tests of immediate and delayed memory as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), with medium to large effects, and high delayed memory scores were helpful in ruling out incompetence (Negative predictive power = 85.71%). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide support for the relationship between cognitive functioning and trial competence, particularly at high and low levels of performance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to expand upon previous research by characterizing the attitudes/preferences of referring providers who utilize neuropsychological services. METHOD: A 31-question survey link, along with a description of the rationale, was disseminated across several professional listservs and email lists, and data was collected over a 6-month period from individuals who refer for neuropsychological services (N = 81). Survey questions included referring provider preferences (e.g., ideal time frame for receiving the neuropsychological report, preferred length/format of the report, sections of the report they read and consider essential, comfort level with recommendations, and open responses regarding other general preferences) as well as narrative details about useful aspects of neuropsychological services versus areas of desired change. RESULTS: The represented referring providers included epileptologists (18), neurologists (12), psychologists (11), other various physician specialties (10), social workers (9), non-physician medical providers (9), psychiatrists (8), and legal services (4). Most referring providers prefer shorter reports (2-4 pages), in bullet-point/table format for ease of readability, and receipt of the completed report within 2 weeks. Approximately half of the respondents reported reading the entire neuropsychological report, with the background, developmental/medical, and educational histories being the least frequently read sections. Nearly all respondents indicated they are satisfied with neuropsychological services overall and agree that the referral question is satisfactorily answered, the findings are communicated clearly, and the diagnostic impressions are logical. Referring providers appreciate most recommendations by neuropsychologists, with the exception of those regarding laboratory work, medications, and other medical procedures. The most useful aspects of neuropsychological services included the thoroughness and integration of the evaluation/report, along with the impressions, diagnoses, and recommendations. Recommendations for future practice included shorter reports, increased availability of neuropsychological services, and more concise impressions and recommendations. Generally speaking, few differences in preferences and satisfaction were noted across provider specialties, patient populations, or practice settings. CONCLUSION: These findings are generally consistent with prior literature that referring providers are satisfied with neuropsychological services overall. The current findings also expand upon the previous research, specifically, that referring providers prefer reports to include bullet-point/table format due to ease of reading and do not read some sections of the report, most likely due to already having an adequate understanding of their patients' background. Illuminating aspects of neuropsychological services perceived to be the most and least useful by consumers of these services provides valuable information to practitioners, particularly in the context of rapidly changing institutional and healthcare demands.

Asunto(s)