RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Absceso Hepático/complicaciones , Absceso Hepático/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobreinfección/complicaciones , Sobreinfección/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumoperitoneo/complicaciones , Clostridium septicum/aislamiento & purificación , Absceso Hepático/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso Hepático/microbiología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Astenia/complicaciones , Diagnóstico DiferencialAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/etiología , Clostridium septicum/aislamiento & purificación , Absceso Hepático/etiología , Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Clostridium septicum/metabolismo , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Fermentación , Gases , Humanos , Absceso Hepático/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso Hepático/microbiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumoperitoneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumoperitoneo/etiología , Rotura Espontánea , Choque Séptico/etiología , Neoplasias del Colon Sigmoide/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Colon Sigmoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Sobreinfección , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More surgical interventions are being performed on octogenarian patients. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with operative mortality and to determine if perioperative transfusions could affect mortality outcomes in a nonselected series of octogenarian patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on a population of 413 consecutive patients over 80 years old, treated surgically, and divided into two groups: transfused and nontransfused patients. The following variables were recorded: sociodemographic characteristics, main diagnoses, surgical procedure and its characteristics, ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) index, transfusion requirements, the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, and operative mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 84.5 years (SD + 3.6). Transfused (25.2 %) and nontransfused patients had similar characteristics; except for neoplasia (P <0.001), NNIS (P = 0.008), operative mortality (P = 0.004), and complications according to Clavien-Dindo score (P <0.001). Operative mortality was 20.1 % (83 patients). The predictive variables associated with operative mortality were ASA score (P <0.001), emergency surgery (P <0.001), and blood transfusion (P = 0.004). After adjusting for the variables age, ASA class, NNIS, emergency surgery, and neoplasia, the multivariate analysis showed that the perioperative transfusion in octogenarian patients continued to be significantly associated with operative mortality (P = 0.019; OR 1.97, 95 % CI 1.12-3.47). CONCLUSION: Perioperative transfusion is an independent predictor of postoperative mortality in surgical octogenarian patients.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Reacción a la Transfusión , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Transfusión Sanguínea/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCCIÓN: La perforación duodenal tras colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) constituye un cuadro infrecuente. Su manejo es controvertido. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar los resultados obtenidos en función de su manejo en una serie de 15 pacientes en los que se diagnosticó esta complicación. MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de las perforaciones duodenales tras CPRE, diagnosticadas en un hospital de tercer nivel entre el 2001 y el 2011. Se analizaron las siguientes variables: edad; sexo; motivo de la CPRE; tipo de perforación; momento del diagnóstico; clínica; prueba de imagen; manejo inicial; técnica quirúrgica; estancia global y mortalidad. RESULTADOS: De un total de 1.923 CPRE realizadas se identificaron 15 perforaciones duodenales tras el procedimiento (0,78%). La localización de la perforación fue en la pared duodenal, lejos de la papila (3 casos) y periampulares (12 casos). En 11 pacientes el diagnóstico se sospechó durante el procedimiento. Las perforaciones de pared duodenal se trataron con cirugía urgente. En 7 de las 12 perforaciones periampulares se realizó manejo conservador inicial con evolución favorable en 5 de ellas. En 4 pacientes se realizó cirugía programada posterior. La estancia media hospitalaria fue de 21,2 días (rango: 3-49) y la mortalidad global del 20%. CONCLUSIONES: Las perforaciones tras CPRE constituyen un cuadro de elevada mortalidad, difícil diagnóstico y complicado abordaje terapéutico que precisa ser individualizado. El manejo conservador selectivo constituye una opción válida y segura
INTRODUCTION: Duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are an uncommon complication. The management of this kind of perforation is controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of the management of a series of 15 patients who were diagnosed with this complication. METHODS: Retrospective study of duodenal perforations after ERCP diagnosed at a tertiary level hospital, between 2001 and 2011. The variables age, sex, ERCP indication, type of perforation, time of diagnosis, clinical presentation, radiographic findings, management, surgical technique, length of stay and intrahospital mortality were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1923 ERCP performed, 15 duodenal perforations were detected (0,78%). Perforation site was the duodenal wall (3 cases) and periampullary (12 cases). Eleven perforations were suspected during the procedure. Patients with duodenal wall perforations underwent immediate surgery. Seven of 12 periampullary perforations were managed conservatively with a favorable outcome in 5 of them. Subsequent scheduled surgery was performed in 4 cases. The mean length of hospital stay was 21,2 days (range: 3-49) and intra-hospital mortality was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Perforations after ERCP have high mortality rates, and require a complicated therapeutic approach that needs to be individualized. Selective conservative management is a valid and safe option in selected patients
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etnología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Duodeno/lesionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are an uncommon complication. The management of this kind of perforation is controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of the management of a series of 15 patients who were diagnosed with this complication. METHODS: Retrospective study of duodenal perforations after ERCP diagnosed at a tertiary level hospital, between 2001 and 2011. The variables age, sex, ERCP indication, type of perforation, time of diagnosis, clinical presentation, radiographic findings, management, surgical technique, length of stay and intrahospital mortality were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1923 ERCP performed, 15 duodenal perforations were detected (0,78%). Perforation site was the duodenal wall (3 cases) and periampullary (12 cases). Eleven perforations were suspected during the procedure. Patients with duodenal wall perforations underwent immediate surgery. Seven of 12 periampullary perforations were managed conservatively with a favorable outcome in 5 of them. Subsequent scheduled surgery was performed in 4 cases. The mean length of hospital stay was 21,2 days (range: 3-49) and intra-hospital mortality was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Perforations after ERCP have high mortality rates, and require a complicated therapeutic approach that needs to be individualized. Selective conservative management is a valid and safe option in selected patients.