Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aerobic exercise (AE) may slow age-related cognitive decline. However, such cognition-sparing effects are not uniform across cognitive domains and studies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation and is also emerging as a potential alternative to pharmaceutical therapies. Like AE, the effectiveness of tDCS is also inconsistent for reducing cognitive impairment in ageing. The unexplored possibility exists that pairing AE and tDCS could produce synergistic effects and reciprocally augment cognition-improving effects in older individuals with and without cognitive impairments. Previous research found such synergistic effects on cognition when cognitive training is paired with tDCS in older individuals with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. AIM: The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to explore if pairing AE with tDCS could augment singular effects of AE and tDCS on global cognition (GC), working memory (WM) and executive function (EF) in older individuals with or without MCI and dementia. METHODS: Using a PRISMA-based systematic review, we compiled studies that examined the effects of AE alone, tDCS alone, and AE and tDCS combined on cognitive function in older individuals with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Using a PICOS approach, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science searches up to December 2021, we focused on 'MoCA', 'MMSE', 'Mini-Cog' (measures) and 'cognition', 'cognitive function', 'cognitive', 'cognitive performance', 'executive function', 'executive process', 'attention', 'memory', 'memory performance' (outcome terms). We included only randomized controlled trials (RTC) in humans if available in English full text over the past 20 years, with participants' age over 60. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies (RTC) by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: Overall, 68 studies were included in the meta-analyses. AE (ES = 0.56 [95% CI: 0.28-0.83], p = 0.01) and tDCS (ES = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.12-1.26], p = 0.02) improved GC in all three groups of older adults combined (healthy, MCI, demented). In healthy population, AE improved GC (ES = 0.46 [95% CI: 0.22-0.69], p = 0.01) and EF (ES = 0.27 [95% CI: 0.05-0.49], p = 0.02). AE improved GC in older adults with MCI (ES = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.21-1.32], p = 0.01). tDCS improved GC (ES = 0.69 [90% CI: 0.12-1.26], p = 0.02), all three cognitive function (GC, WM and EF) combined in older adults with dementia (ES = 1.12 [95% CI: 0.04-2.19], p = 0.04) and improved cognitive function in older adults overall (ES = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.20-1,18], p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our systematic review with meta-analysis provided evidence that beyond the cardiovascular and fitness benefits of AE, pairing AE with tDCS may have the potential to slow symptom progression of cognitive decline in MCI and dementia. Future studies will examine the hypothesis of this present review that a potentiating effect would incrementally improve cognition with increasing severity of cognitive impairment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

La anestesia con éter por vía intravenosa fue una técnica anestésica utilizada en los años iniciales del siglo XX. Tuvo una granaceptación en Alemania. En la década de los sesenta del siglo pasado fue usada en cirugía endoscópica. El éter ha sido utilizadocon éxito para estudiar los tiempos de la circulación portal. (AU)

Intravenous ether anesthesia was an anesthetic technique used in the initial years of the XX century. It was mostly used in Germany.In the sixties decade of the past century it was used for endoscopic surgery. Ether has been used successfully for the study of circulation time of portal circulation. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Sicard y Cathelin en 1901, introducen de manera simultánea la administración sacra de fármacos. En 1919, Läwen fue un gran defensor de la anestesia regional. Gil-Vernet en 1917 describe los fundamentos anatómicos de la técnica de abordaje sacro al espacio epidural. Fidel Pagés Miravé es el verdadero introductor de la anestesia epidural. Su artículo publicado en 1921, Anestesia Metamérica, en la Revista Española de Cirugía, constituye un hito en la historia de la anestesia. Diez años más tarde Dogliotti publica sus resultados, sin citar la aportación de Pagés. La gran mayoría de los historiadores citan a Dogliotti en la bibliografía, ignorando a Pagés. Gutiérrez un cirujano argentino alertó del error histórico y revindicó la aportación original de Pagés. En la actualidad todos los libros de historia de la anestesia reseñan la publicación de Pagés. El anestesiólogo cubano Manuel Martínez Curbelo, introduce en la clínica la anestesia epidural continua. En esta publicación revisamos la historia del abordaje sacro, torácico y lumbar del espacio epidural. Describimos las distintas agujas y catéteres utilizados. En la práctica diaria anestésica la analgesia/anestesia epidural se utiliza en cirugía, analgesia del trabajo del parto, tratamiento del dolor agudo y crónico. (AU)

Sicard and Cathelin in 1901 introduced independently the sacral injection of drugs. In 1910 Läwen was an enthusiastic defender of regional anaesthesia. Gil-Vernet in 1917 introduced new anatomical concepts in epidural sacral approach. Fidel Pagés Mirave was true pioneer of epidural anaesthesia. His publication in 1921, Metameric Anaesthesia, in the Spanish Journal of Surgery is a landmark in the history of world anaesthesia. Ten years later Dogliotti published his experiences with epidural anaesthesia, without anyreference to Pagés’ research. Most medical historians date the regular use of epidural anaesthesia from Dogliotti’s paper, published ten years later, and ignoring Pagés research. Gutierrez a surgeon born in Argentina, recognized the error and promoted the original scientific publication of Pages. Today all the important books of anaesthesia reference the first discoverer of epidural anaesthesia. The Cuban anaesthesiologist Manuel Martinez Curbelo, introduced into clinical practice continuous epidural anaesthesia. In this article we review the history of sacral and thoracic and lumbar approach to the epidural space, its different needles and catheters used in these techniques. Epidural analgesia/ anaesthesia are commonly used in daily practice in surgery, labour pain, and in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Following non-informative peripheral cues, responses are facilitated at the cued compared to the uncued location at short cue-target intervals. This effect reverses at longer intervals, giving rise to Inhibition of Return (IOR). The integration-segregation hypothesis (Lupiáñez, 2010) suggests that peripheral cues always produce an onset-detection cost regardless the behavioral cueing effect that is measured - either facilitation or IOR. In the present study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the causal contribution of this detection cost to performance. We used a cueing paradigm with a target discrimination task that was preceded by a non-informative peripheral cue. The presence-absence of a central intervening event was manipulated. Online TMS to the left superior parietal lobe (compared to an active vertex stimulation) lead to an overall more positive effect (faster responses for cued as compared to uncued trials), by putatively impairing the detection cost contribution to performance. The data revealed a strong association between overall RT and the TMS effect, and also between overall RT and the integrity of the first branch of the left superior longitudinal fascicule. These results have critical implications not only for the open debate about the mechanism/s underlying spatial orienting effects, but also for the growing literature demonstrating that white matter connectivity is crucial for explaining inter-individual behavioral variability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

No disponible

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Brown trout Salmo trutta alevins were maintained at 8 and 11° C at three conditions over a 9 day period from yolk sac exhaustion: fed ad libitum, starved or fed ad libitum after starvation. Whole-body gene expressions for proteins involved in energy metabolism and the two primary proteolytic pathways were assessed. This study is the first to show an over-expression of proteasome and autophagy-related genes in young stages of salmonids, particularly at 11° C.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

No disponible

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Desde la primera descripción de la técnica epidural en los años 1920, el progreso continuo en el conocimiento de la anatomía y de la fisiología del espacio epidural ha permitido desarrollar diferentes técnicas de localización de este espacio para aumentar tanto la seguridad como la eficacia del procedimiento. Las técnicas más utilizadas hoy en día se basan en las 2 principales propiedades descritas del espacio epidural: la diferencia de distensibilidad entre el ligamento amarillo y el espacio epidural y la existencia de una presión negativa en el espacio epidural. Sin embargo, en los últimos años, la evolución tecnológica ha permitido desarrollar nuevas técnicas de localización basadas en otras propiedades físicas de los tejidos. Algunas de ellas están todavía en una fase experimental, pero otras como las técnicas con ultrasonidos han alcanzado una fase clínica y se está expandiendo su uso en la práctica diaria (AU)

Since the first description of the epidural technique during the 1920s, the continuous progress of knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the epidural space has allowed the development of different techniques to locate this space while increasing both the safety and efficacy of the procedure. The most common techniques used today are based on the two main characteristics of the epidural space: the difference in distensibility between the ligamentum flavum and the epidural space, and the existence of negative pressure within the epidural space. However, over recent years, technological advances have allowed the development of new techniques to locate the epidural space based on other physical properties of tissues. Some are still in the experimental phase, but others, like ultrasound-location have reached a clinical phase and are being used increasingly in daily practice (AU)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Since the first description of the epidural technique during the 1920s, the continuous progress of knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the epidural space has allowed the development of different techniques to locate this space while increasing both the safety and efficacy of the procedure. The most common techniques used today are based on the two main characteristics of the epidural space: the difference in distensibility between the ligamentum flavum and the epidural space, and the existence of negative pressure within the epidural space. However, over recent years, technological advances have allowed the development of new techniques to locate the epidural space based on other physical properties of tissues. Some are still in the experimental phase, but others, like ultrasound-location have reached a clinical phase and are being used increasingly in daily practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción. El bloqueo neuromuscular facilita la manipulación de la vía aérea, la ventilación y procedimientos quirúrgicos, pero no hay un consenso a nivel nacional que facilite la práctica clínica habitual. El objetivo fue conocer el grado de acuerdo entre anestesiólogos y cirujanos sobre el uso clínico del bloqueo neuromuscular, para establecer recomendaciones de mejora de su empleo durante un procedimiento anestésico-quirúrgico. Métodos. Estudio de consenso multidisciplinar en España, que incluyó anestesiólogos expertos en bloqueo neuromuscular (n=65) y cirujanos generales (n=36). Se utilizó metodología Delphi. Cuestionario con 17 preguntas consensuado por un comité científico, al que respondieron los expertos en dos olas. El cuestionario incluyó preguntas sobre: tipo de cirugía, tipo de paciente, beneficios/perjuicios durante y después de la cirugía, repercusión de la monitorización objetiva y del uso de fármacos reversores, la viabilidad de abordaje multidisciplinar y eficiente del procedimiento quirúrgico, enfocado en el grado de bloqueo neuromuscular. Resultados. Se establecieron cinco recomendaciones: 1) el bloqueo neuromuscular profundo es muy adecuado en cirugía abdominal (grado de acuerdo 94,1%), y 2) en pacientes con obesidad (76,2%); 3) el mantenimiento del bloqueo neuromuscular profundo hasta el final de la cirugía puede ser beneficioso en aspectos clínicos, como inmovilidad del paciente o mejor acceso quirúrgico (86,1 y 72,3%); 4) la monitorización cuantitativa y la disponibilidad de reversores del bloqueo neuromuscular es recomendable (89,1%); 5) se recomiendan protocolos de actuación conjuntos entre anestesiólogos y cirujanos. Conclusiones. La colaboración entre anestesiólogos y cirujanos generales, ha permitido establecer una serie de recomendaciones genéricas sobre el uso de bloqueo neuromuscular profundo en cirugía abdominal (AU)

Introduction. Neuromuscular blockade enables airway management, ventilation and surgical procedures. However there is no national consensus on its routine clinical use. The objective was to establish the degree of agreement among anaesthesiologists and general surgeons on the clinical use of neuromuscular blockade in order to make recommendations to improve its use during surgical procedures. Methods. Multidisciplinary consensus study in Spain. Anaesthesiologists experts in neuromuscular blockade management (n=65) and general surgeons (n=36) were included. Delphi methodology was selected. A survey with 17 final questions developed by a dedicated scientific committee was designed. The experts answered the successive questions in two waves. The survey included questions on: type of surgery, type of patient, benefits/harm during and after surgery, impact of objective neuromuscular monitoring and use of reversal drugs, viability of a multidisciplinary and efficient approach to the whole surgical procedure, focussing on the level of neuromuscular blockade. Results. Five recommendations were agreed: 1) deep neuromuscular blockade is very appropriate for abdominal surgery (degree of agreement 94.1%), 2) and in obese patients (76.2%); 3) deep neuromuscular blockade maintenance until end of surgery might be beneficial in terms of clinical aspects, such as as immobility or better surgical access (86.1 to 72.3%); 4) quantitative monitoring and reversal drugs availability is recommended (89.1%); finally 5) anaesthesiologists/surgeons joint protocols are recommended. Conclusions. Collaboration among anaesthesiologists and surgeons has enabled some general recommendations to be established on deep neuromuscular blockade use during abdominal surgery (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Neuromuscular blockade enables airway management, ventilation and surgical procedures. However there is no national consensus on its routine clinical use. The objective was to establish the degree of agreement among anaesthesiologists and general surgeons on the clinical use of neuromuscular blockade in order to make recommendations to improve its use during surgical procedures. METHODS: Multidisciplinary consensus study in Spain. Anaesthesiologists experts in neuromuscular blockade management (n=65) and general surgeons (n=36) were included. Delphi methodology was selected. A survey with 17 final questions developed by a dedicated scientific committee was designed. The experts answered the successive questions in two waves. The survey included questions on: type of surgery, type of patient, benefits/harm during and after surgery, impact of objective neuromuscular monitoring and use of reversal drugs, viability of a multidisciplinary and efficient approach to the whole surgical procedure, focussing on the level of neuromuscular blockade. RESULTS: Five recommendations were agreed: 1) deep neuromuscular blockade is very appropriate for abdominal surgery (degree of agreement 94.1%), 2) and in obese patients (76.2%); 3) deep neuromuscular blockade maintenance until end of surgery might be beneficial in terms of clinical aspects, such as as immobility or better surgical access (86.1 to 72.3%); 4) quantitative monitoring and reversal drugs availability is recommended (89.1%); finally 5) anaesthesiologists/surgeons joint protocols are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration among anaesthesiologists and surgeons has enabled some general recommendations to be established on deep neuromuscular blockade use during abdominal surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

El Ministerio de Sanidad (MSSSI) aprobó (abril de 2013) el proyecto denominado «Compromiso por la Calidad de las Sociedades Científicas en España», en respuesta a la demanda social y profesional por la sostenibilidad del sistema de salud. La iniciativa se enmarca en las actividades de la Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías y Prestaciones, del Sistema Nacional de Salud, y está coordinado de forma conjunta por la Subdirección General de Calidad y Cohesión, por el Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), y por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). A este Proyecto se han incorporado todas las sociedades científicas de nuestro país, y su objetivo principal es disminuir la utilización de intervenciones sanitarias innecesarias, con el fin de acordar recomendaciones de «no hacer», basadas en la evidencia científica. Nuestro objetivo primario fue identificar intervenciones que no han demostrado eficacia, tienen efectividad escasa o dudosa, no son coste-efectivas o no son prioritarias. Los objetivos secundarios fueron: la reducción de la variabilidad en la práctica clínica, la difusión entre médicos y pacientes para orientar en la toma de decisiones, el uso adecuado de los recursos sanitarios y, por último, la promoción de la seguridad clínica y la reducción de la iatrogenia. El proceso de selección de las 5 recomendaciones de «no hacer» se realizó mediante la metodología Delphi. 25 panelistas (todo anestesiólogos) eligieron entre 15 propuestas basadas en: evidencia de calidad que la sustenta, relevancia o impacto clínico de la misma y población a la que afecta. Las 5 recomendaciones propuestas fueron: No mantener niveles profundos de sedación en pacientes críticos sin una indicación específica; No realizar radiografía preoperatoria de tórax en pacientes menores de 40 años con estado físico ASA I o II; No realizar, de manera sistemática, pruebas preoperatorias en cirugía de cataratas, salvo indicación basada en historia clínica y exploración física; No programar cirugía electiva con riesgo de hemorragia en pacientes con anemia hasta realizar estudio diagnóstico y tratamiento adecuados; y No realizar pruebas de laboratorio (hemograma, bioquímica y estudio de coagulación) en pacientes sanos o con enfermedad sistémica leve (ASA I y II) previo a cirugías de bajo riesgo, con pérdida estimada de sangre mínima (AU)

In April 2013 the Ministry of Health (MSSSI) adopted the project called «Commitment to Quality by Scientific Societies in Spain», in response to social and professional demands for sustainability of the health system. The initiative is part of the activities of the Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System, and is coordinated jointly by the Quality and Cohesion Department, the Aragon Institute of Health Sciences (IACS), and the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). All the scientific societies in Spain have been included in this project, and its main objective is to reduce the unnecessary use of health interventions in order to agree «do not do» recommendations, based on scientific evidence. The primary objective was to identify interventions that have not proven effective, have limited or doubtful effectiveness, are not cost-effective, or do not have priority. Secondary objectives were: reducing variability in clinical practice, to spread information between doctors and patients to guide decision-making, the appropriate use of health resources and, the promotion of clinical safety and reducing iatrogenesis. The selection process of the 5 «do not do» recommendations was made by Delphi methodology. A total of 25 panellists (all anaesthesiologists) chose between 15 proposals based on: evidence that supports quality, relevance, or clinical impact, and the people they affect. The 5 recommendations proposed were: Do not maintain deep levels of sedation in critically ill patients without a specific indication; Do not perform preoperative chest radiography in patients under 40 years-old with ASA physical status I or II; Do not systematically perform preoperative tests in cataract surgery unless otherwise indicated based on clinical history and physical examination; Do not perform elective surgery in patients with anaemia at risk of bleeding until a diagnostic workup is performed and treatment is given; and not perform laboratory tests (blood count, biochemistry and coagulation) prior to surgery in healthy or low risk patients (ASA I and II) with minimal estimated blood loss (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In April 2013 the Ministry of Health (MSSSI) adopted the project called "Commitment to Quality by Scientific Societies in Spain", in response to social and professional demands for sustainability of the health system. The initiative is part of the activities of the Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System, and is coordinated jointly by the Quality and Cohesion Department, the Aragon Institute of Health Sciences (IACS), and the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). All the scientific societies in Spain have been included in this project, and its main objective is to reduce the unnecessary use of health interventions in order to agree "do not do" recommendations, based on scientific evidence. The primary objective was to identify interventions that have not proven effective, have limited or doubtful effectiveness, are not cost-effective, or do not have priority. Secondary objectives were: reducing variability in clinical practice, to spread information between doctors and patients to guide decision-making, the appropriate use of health resources and, the promotion of clinical safety and reducing iatrogenesis. The selection process of the 5 "do not do" recommendations was made by Delphi methodology. A total of 25 panellists (all anaesthesiologists) chose between 15 proposals based on: evidence that supports quality, relevance, or clinical impact, and the people they affect. The 5 recommendations proposed were: Do not maintain deep levels of sedation in critically ill patients without a specific indication; Do not perform preoperative chest radiography in patients under 40 years-old with ASA physical status I or II; Do not systematically perform preoperative tests in cataract surgery unless otherwise indicated based on clinical history and physical examination; Do not perform elective surgery in patients with anaemia at risk of bleeding until a diagnostic workup is performed and treatment is given; and not perform laboratory tests (blood count, biochemistry and coagulation) prior to surgery in healthy or low risk patients (ASA I and II) with minimal estimated blood loss.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

No disponible

Asunto(s)